User talk:Spaceteez

This is Spaceteez's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damo K (October 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CoconutOctopus were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damo K and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 22:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Spaceteez! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CoconutOctopus talk 22:01, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Spaceteez This was declined as the singer does not meet WP:NSINGER notability requirements. Qcne (talk) 21:29, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne this day live and Vanguardngr is a notable newspaper in Nigeria Spaceteez (talk) 21:32, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Spaceteez We usually require at least three sources that are independent of each other, are independent of the subject, and provide significant coverage. Qcne (talk) 21:37, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne okay, lemme continue to work on the article then send it for review again if I've added 1 more references to the one's that are there right? Spaceteez (talk) 22:01, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I only see a single reference on the draft at the moment. We need at least three. Qcne (talk) 22:10, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne I've added more references and citations. the discography reference is a reliable source that has been reviewed by premium times, a big newspaper news site in Nigeria Spaceteez (talk) 08:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Qcne I've resubmitted my draft again for proper review Spaceteez (talk) 08:16, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Damo K (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:MUSICBIO - thehistory.co.za is not a reliable or acceptable source. The Vanguard and This Day references are both primary sources and therefore not independent or reliable either.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Damo K and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 08:25, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Hi - I'm Girth Summit, an administrator here. I've come here to warn you that comments like this are not acceptable. I recognised that you were not profane or particularly egregious, but it is still a personal attack, which is prohibited here. The person you were speaking to is a massively experienced and knowledgeable editor who was voluntarily spending their time to help you improve your draft; you might not like the advice you were given, and you might not like our guidelines or the way that our editorial review process works, but that does not give you licence to insult the person who is giving up their time to help you. Please don't do anything like that again. Thank you Girth Summit _(blether) 13:11, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Helgason (Unity Technologies)

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spaceteez (talk) 20:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article David Helgason (Unity Technologies) needs to be reviewed please.

Proposed deletion notify - November 2024

Proposed deletion of Plutomania (Records)

The article Plutomania (Records) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article requires upgrading to standalone status; presently, it may warrant deletion, although it could potentially be recreated in the future if it gains sufficient notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 2RDD (talk) 14:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note on Lord Lamba

Thanks for your edits to Lord Lamba but PM News is a reliable source with an editorial board. The source itself may be a routine news that does not contribute to notability but it is not an unreliable source. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 15:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're not wrong,the reference was not aligning with the article that's why I removed it. Every reference or source that's notable should align with an article that's being created. Thank you for understanding. Spaceteez (talk) 15:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Warning!!!

@Spaceteez: Please do not remove the deletion tag on Plutomania (Records) again. It will be decided by top editors if it will be deleted or not. Removing the tag yourself without fixing the issue is prohibited. I suggest you learn rules and regulations. Thank you. 2RDD (talk) 19:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@2RDD no, anyone may remove a PROD tag from an article. I suggest you re-read WP:PROD and re-acquaint yourself with it, especially before warning anyone. @Spaceteez, you did not do anything wrong in this instance. CoconutOctopus talk 19:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, "top editors" is not a thing. Articles are deleted at AFD by community consensus, and at PROD and CSD if they meet specific criteria. CoconutOctopus talk 19:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you're requesting for speedydeletion without an appropriate reason to fix or improve it then you're wrong. Thank you CoconutOctopus Spaceteez (talk) 19:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

okay, but I will improve the article more. Here is a redirect Plutomania Records which is redirected to Shallipopi. I suggest this article Plutomania (Records) should be change to Plutomania Records. Its actual name. Thank you @CoconutOctopus 2RDD (talk) 19:30, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The name you've suggested is already on redirect. If you're capable of cleaning and redirecting it to Plutomania Records then you can help to do so. Wikipedia is a platform where other volunteers helps to improve an article and not just to request for speedy deletion. Thank you. Spaceteez (talk) 19:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weighing in, I think that 2RDD confused PROD with CSD. The record label is not notable on its own and because a redirect on the proper name is already in place, Spaceteez, would you mind nominating your version for deletion through CSD? Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 20:13, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just to add Spaceteez, your creations are previously deleted articles (through AfD) or redirects which you’ve bypassed by adding unnecessary disambiguator to the title. Nominating these articles for deletions for deletions would seem like a waste of community time. Also, you need to familiarise yourself with the inclusion criteria because creating further articles. Best, Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 20:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Removing unreliable sources??

I noticed you removed some sources from Destalker (comedian) claiming they are unreliable sources. Thisday is part of reliable sources for Wiki Project Nigeria, please use this as guide next time. Kind regards, I won't revert the edits but please be on the watch next time. Tesleemah (talk) 07:33, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The content on the website appeared to have been removed so you are right removing them as they are outdated not ~~unreliable~~ as you claimed. Tesleemah (talk) 07:38, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem Spaceteez (talk) 07:42, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have created some nice articles, A good job over there! Tesleemah (talk) 07:56, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, it took me some time to master Wikipedia. Spaceteez (talk) 09:05, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Ijumdiya wadzani per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ijumdiya wadzani. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 20:59, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|I've made the mistake in the past. Which i eventually went through Wikipedia's Guide line. Please I'm only here to improve and contribute. I'm not on Wikipedia to abuse pages. Please I wish to request an unblock} Spaceteez (talk) 21:42, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok, in the past, I used my IP to vandalize pages, without making proper research. but immediately I mastered Wikipedia's Guidelines I now knew what Wikipedia it's all about. the constructive edits I be making in the future, is to improve and make proper references to any page I'm going to edit. Spaceteez (talk) 00:09, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Spaceteez (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've made the mistake in the past. Which i eventually went through Wikipedia's Guide line. Please I'm only here to improve and contribute. I'm not on Wikipedia to abuse pages. Please I wish to request an unblock

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. Thanks. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 23:09, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Deletion discussion about Jadrolita

Hello Spaceteez, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Jadrolita, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jadrolita.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ibjaja055}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ibjaja055 (talk) 16:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]