Jump to content

User talk:SourceRight

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, SourceRight, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

SourceRight, good luck, and have fun. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 22:56, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 20:50, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, SourceRight! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 20:50, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonita Doda (October 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 07:26, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi SourceRight! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Article of notable actor, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.


The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, SourceRight. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 13:26, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sir im not connected to person in anyway ..my area of interest is actors and filmmaker's so I started with one (Jonita Doda) i have made all the changes and added every inline citation and made it totally neutral.kindly have a look and approve the page as it is of a highly notable actor.thanksSourceRight (talk) 12:08, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonita Doda (November 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 12:14, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonita Doda (November 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
All wiki sources need to be replaced with reliable ones, also Amazon is not a suitable source.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 12:15, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jonita Doda has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jonita Doda. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:02, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jonita Doda has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jonita Doda. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:45, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonita Doda (November 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by Hatchens were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Hatchens (talk) 17:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
what does this mean how can i re edit and resubmit the article ? SourceRight (talk) 15:50, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You don't. In the AfC process, rejection is different from declining in that you aren't supposed to resubmit the article after a rejection. Please see WP:OVERCOME. — {{u|Bsoyka}} talk 16:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
ok thanks SourceRight (talk) 17:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
in that case sir u should go and remove every actor that you have on wikipedia.SourceRight (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I fail to see how that's even close to accurate or reasonable. — {{u|Bsoyka}} talk 16:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
that was in reference to a very rude remark by someone. SourceRight (talk) 17:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nothing has been removed from this talk page as far as I can see in the history, so I'm really not sure what rude remark you're referring to. Regardless, your suggestion is still not accurate or reasonable. — {{u|Bsoyka}} talk 17:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jonita Doda has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jonita Doda. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:57, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
sir my bad I'm not able to see your reply...kindly help SourceRight (talk) 16:00, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "SourceRight", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 16:10, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

sir as i explained it was my first article and i wasn't familiar with writing and editing formats. the choice of name was to represent my feeling of doing some right contribution.thats all ! SourceRight (talk) 16:20, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you work for the subject of your draft, or the agency that represents her/does her PR, you are a paid editor, you do not have to be specifically paid to edit. 331dot (talk) 16:11, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

no sir I'm a individual and in no way work for any company or represent the subject. As advised i have already requested for a change of user name. SourceRight (talk) 16:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
What is your association with the subject? So you picked the name of a company as your username at random? I don't believe that. 331dot (talk) 16:21, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your user name is the same as a digital IT and technology consulting business, hence the confusion. Theroadislong (talk) 16:22, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
sir its a sheer co incidence im not even aware if there is a company by that name.i have nothing to do with any it company.. you can see im not even a pro with my edits . im not a It guy. SourceRight (talk) 16:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
nothing sir im a film enthusiast and wanted to contribute to the same field but got stuck with the first article itself. im not even aware if sourceright is a company its a pure co- incidence SourceRight (talk) 16:24, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
i request you to re consider the article so that i feel motivated to do more good contributions. SourceRight (talk) 16:27, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
nothing sir im a film enthusiast and wanted to contribute to the same field but got stuck with the first article itself. im not even aware if sourceright is a company its a pure co- incidence SourceRight SourceRight (talk) 16:31, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I do not believe for a second that you chose your username at random, please do not insult our intelligence. As a "film enthusasist" how did you decide on Ms. Doda to write about first if you have no association with her whatsoever? 331dot (talk) 16:33, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
sir i had to start with somebody n it happened to be miss.doda as i saw there is not wikipedia in her name even after having a major contribution.and i can only tell you the truth i dont know how to make you believe wat im saying SourceRight (talk) 16:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And how did you obtain the image of her? 331dot (talk) 16:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
her image was on the wikipedia commons SourceRight (talk) 16:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm. I also see that you had attempted to upload several images of Ms. Doda on Commons that were deleted. How did you obtain those images? 331dot (talk) 17:14, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
they were all available on google. SourceRight (talk) 13:41, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You can't just use random images from the Internet; that's copyright infringement. — {{u|Bsoyka}} talk 16:53, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
they were copyright free, i only used the eligible ones. SourceRight (talk) 17:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly not, judging by your Commons talk page. Images are copyrighted by default unless they say otherwise, and usually very few do. — {{u|Bsoyka}} talk 17:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
im sure thats why they were deleted. as i mentioned earlier too it was my first contribution i wasnt aware about certain things. SourceRight (talk) 17:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jonita Doda (March 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bsoyka was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Note that no amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability. I hate to say it this way, but it may be time to just let this one go.
— {{u|Bsoyka}} talk 17:05, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, club, organization, company, or website, I have blocked this account. Please take a moment to either create a new account, or request a change of username of your current account here. The new username must represent only yourself as an individual and comply with Wikipedia's username policy.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

Please also note that you are permitted to use a username that contains the name of a company or organization if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

 Thank you. TheSandDoctor Talk 22:52, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Jonita Doda

[edit]

Information icon Hello, SourceRight. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jonita Doda, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SourceRight&oldid=1122630613"