User talk:Soumya Sekhar Biswas

Welcome

Hello, Soumya Sekhar Biswas, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! - wolf 06:01, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

September 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to College and university rankings—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 08:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please don't use deceptive edit summaries - this appears to be a trend. Kuru (talk) 03:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm RovingPersonalityConstruct. I noticed that you recently made an edit in which your edit summary did not appear to describe the change you made. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 02:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I understand. Will specify next time. Soumya Sekhar Biswas (talk) 04:29, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in (a) GamerGate, (b) any gender-related dispute or controversy, (c) people associated with (a) or (b), all broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 17:47, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Firestar464 (talk) 04:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What's the problem? Specify. I don't remember deleting anything, rather aligned data according to sequence(which happened before). Soumya Sekhar Biswas (talk) 04:22, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see you are claiming to be oblivious to the issue. However you must know what this is about. You are using a standard edit summary of "Fixed typo, Fixed grammar" when you are doing neither of those things and in fact adding/changing content. This is misleading and cannot continue. Please make sure you are accurately describing your edit. Examples:

[1] Edit summary was "Fixed typo", when nothing was "fixed" but content was added.
[2] Edit summary was "Fixed typo, fixed grammar", when nothing was "fixed" but content was added.
[3] Edit summary was "Fixed typo, fixed grammar", when nothing was "fixed" but content was added.
[4] Edit summary was "Fixed typo, fixed grammar", when nothing was "fixed" but content was added.
[5] Edit summary was "Fixed typo, fixed grammar", when nothing was "fixed" but content was added.
[6] Edit summary was "Fixed typo, fixed grammar", when nothing was "fixed" but content was added.
[7] Edit summary was "Fixed typo, fixed grammar", when nothing was "fixed" but content was added.

Thanks Mark83 (talk) 05:49, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Firestar464. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. "Are you some self-appointed vigilante?" That's not really respectful. Firestar464 (talk) 06:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pahela Baisakh Page

Soumya

I saw your alert on the Pahela Baisakh talk page. Thank you. I reintroduced the material on Shashank that had been deleted. Please continue to keep a tab on that page.

Dipendra2007 (talk) 20:20, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. Thanks SReader21 (talk) 20:22, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]