Jump to content

User talk:Sneha-SIPL

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shivani Khetan (May 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nomadicghumakkad were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 07:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Sneha-SIPL! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 07:18, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shivani Khetan (May 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Jeromeenriquez was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Jeromeenriquez (talk) 08:01, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shivani Khetan (May 25)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Jeromeenriquez was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Hi, I just checked that you've marked the Draft:Shivani_Khetan as rejected can you please help me out with the draft as all the sources are authenticated and she has enough presence in Google. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sneha-SIPL (talk • contribs) 05:46, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Dear Sneha-SIPL i reviewed the article once again and checked all the references. All the references has her interview. The content and the references are different. Please understand that only people included on the Wikipedia are those who has achieved something notable. I tried to find some more sources to find about the subject but couldn't find it. Subject is a doctor and a tarot card reader. She started a start up, which isn't notable even. I am proposing it for deletion. You can ask other editors for their opinion. Thanks. Jeromeenriquez (talk)

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 13:58, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Shivani Khetan

[edit]

Draft:Shivani Khetan, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Shivani Khetan and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Shivani Khetan during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jeromeenriquez (talk) 14:11, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shabri Prasad Singh (October 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Shabri Prasad Singh, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 05:14, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shabri Prasad Singh has been accepted

[edit]
Shabri Prasad Singh, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Rusalkii (talk) 04:17, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sujata Parashar (December 27)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Slywriter were:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
large sections contain no citation
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Slywriter (talk) 14:18, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Purshottam Lal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Governor of Punjab. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anne Rice Award

[edit]
Anne Rice Award
The Anne Rice Award honors editors who have improved Wikipedia's coverage of women writers by creating a biography of a women writer who used a pen name, nom de plume, literary initials, or pseudonym on the title page or by-line of their works in place of their real name. On behalf of WP:WPWW, thank you for creating the biography on Shabri Prasad (pen name of Shabri Prasad Singh). --Rosiestep (talk) 22:10, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sujata Parashar (March 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:
This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 14:48, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Purshottam Lal for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Purshottam Lal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purshottam Lal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

bonadea contributions talk 15:18, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Sneha-SIPL. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Sneha-SIPL. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Sneha-SIPL|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. See discussion here. Articles and drafts involved are Purshottam Lal, Draft:Sujata Parashar, Shabri Prasad Singh, and various titles connected to Shivani Khetan. bonadea contributions talk 16:06, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Sneha-SIPL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Sneha-SIPL (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Chetali11". The reason given for Chetali11's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts".

Decline reason: Autoblock working as intended. Now blocked directly. PhilKnight (talk) 08:05, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sneha-SIPL (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not have any idea how my account got blocked because of a different user. Kindly check and provide the resolution asap. ThanksSneha-SIPL (talk) 06:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

My use of the checkuser tool indicates that you have abused multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 08:05, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Logged out editing

[edit]

Noting here that the user has edited as an IP since being blocked, posting to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purshottam Lal about an article they were paid to create.

--bonadea contributions talk 21:04, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shabri Prasad Singh for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shabri Prasad Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shabri Prasad Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

─ The Aafī on Mobile (talk) 18:26, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sujata Parashar

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sujata Parashar, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Randykitty (talk) 15:12, 5 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sneha-SIPL&oldid=1091653947"