User talk:Smeggysmeg

Welcome!

Hello Smeggysmeg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ^Blank ^Verse 18:49, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Warring Factions

I did a brief bit of cleanup and spell-checking on the Warring Factions article. An easy way to do spell-checking when writing Wikipedia articles is to use the Mozilla Firefox internet browser, and then add the SpellBound extension. After you've added the extension, then install both the American Engish and British English spell-checkers so you can select which one you want to use (see the Wikipedia Manual of Style for info on dealing with the different versions of English).

A suggestion for the Warring Factions#Brief, Inaccurate History: Since it is admittedly inaccurate, and almost all of that section is only of interest to hardcore Warring Factions players, it is really not encyclopedia material. It is the type of info that would be more appropriate if the Warring Factions MMOG had its own wiki. History for an encyclopedia entry would be info like when was the game started, how was the game engine developed, etc. You might look at some of the other articles on MMOGs for ideas on how to edit the Warring Factions article.

I took a brief look at the Warring Factions website and didn't see anything about the game history, so you might have to contact some of the admins or game developers by email. ^Blank ^Verse 08:06, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

One other suggestion: You might look at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer and video games. ^Blank ^Verse 08:11, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Gender neutrality...

Good job. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 18:44, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal tags

Thank you for reverting vandalism on Wikipedia!

Be sure to put warning tags on the vandal's user talk page (such as {{subst:test}}, {{subst:test2}}, {{subst:test3}}, {{subst:test4}}). Add each of these tags on the vandal's talk page, in sequential order, after each instance of vandalism. Adding warnings to the talk page assists administrators in determining whether or not the user should be blocked. If the user continues to vandalize pages after you add the {{subst:test4}} tag, request administrator assistance at Request for Intervention. Again, thank you for helping to make Wikipedia better. Alphax ^τεχ 02:12, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your userpage was briefly delisted by a rogue admin

This user believes that only articles need reflect a NPOV, and that displaying political, religious, or other beliefs using userboxes and user categories should not be banned.

You have a userbox Template:User UN which links your userpage to United Nations Wikipedians. There is currently a movement to ban userboxes from Wikipedia which are shared and which create List of Wikipedians. Certain admins have taken it upon themselves to preemptively sabotage and/or delete such categories and template. Here is the incident report which reported damage to yours, in which hundreds of userpages were delinked from categories without the users' knowledge. They have been stopped, barely, and the damage reverted— for now.

There is a Wikipedia:Userbox policy poll, which if passed, will make required by policy the damage done to categories and templates such as User UN/United Nations Wikipedians. If you do not want this to happen, I urge you to vote Oppose. in the poll. Support is currently running at about 66%, and your vote could make the difference. It is said to require 75%-80% to be deemed reflective of consensus.

Thank you,

StrangerInParadise 23:14, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes

Just so you know, you do have a choice of userbox layouts. You can choose to have them horizontal as well. :) - File:Ottawa flag.png nath a nrdotcom ^{(Talk • Contribs)} 02:23, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

For the little time we'll have them left, the way it's going. Smeggysmeg 02:55, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I hope for the best on that, but expect the worst. :| - File:Ottawa flag.png nath a nrdotcom ^{(Talk • Contribs)} 03:04, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Smeggy

Hi Smeggy, you may not know me very well, but apparrently you've seen me before. ;-) I like your userpage, it almost seems familiar, like it used to be mine. :-D Not that I mind, but did you borrow the format from my old page? — The King of Kings 04:45, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't from yours, as your name doesn't look familiar. I think it was someone else; meaning they probably ripped it from you before I ripped it from them. Sorry. Smeggysmeg 03:35, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Apple Computer

That article is just reporting Shaw Wu's speculation. His speculation is not fact. His speculations have been wrong many times in the past. Also Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. AlistairMcMillan 00:06, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ITT Technical Institute

Hey, you've been active on that page recently, so I'm specifically looking for your input, if you have some. I have added some information to the controversy section. It is all true. However, it probably tips the POV too much to the positive side. In my mind, Wikipedia NPOV policy is not about removing true statements but balancing them with other true statements. Do you think there's a NPOV way we could bring up the fact that some ITT grads feel cheated during and/or afterwards? Some people clearly do feel that ITT is a diploma mill, but we have to be able to cite it to mention it. Any thoughts on how we could do that? Jacqui ^★ 19:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grammar issue

I noticed that you listed yourself as a grammar nazi. I actually have a grammar issue that I thought you might be willing to help with. It is regarding whether or not dances (like waltz, tango, swing, ballet, etc.) should be capitalized. There is currently a discussion about it at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dance and Talk:Lindy Hop. We would certainly appreciate your input. Thanks! —Cswrye 14:27, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TeenSpot

"However, in the Singles and Flirt chatrooms particularly, TeenSpot remains a place to trade pornographic images and webcams of minors."

I honestly don't know HOW to cite this claim, but, it's quite true, and quite factual. I've been in the chatrooms and am capable of taking logs, and 99.9% of the "chat" is people requesting cybersex and webcams and pictures. How can that be cited? --Signed and Sealed, JJJJust (T C) 05:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Find an article specifically mentioning those facts in some kind of legitimate online news, but remember: no independent research. Smeggysmeg 05:38, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:JBaird.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:JBaird.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MECU≈talk 18:37, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Bledel

You don't seem like the kind of editor who would vandalize, so could you please explain this edit on my talk page (I just want to make sure no one has hacked your account)? ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 01:37, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I made a mistake in reverting, wasn't paying attention closely enough. Smeggysmeg 01:40, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE:Alexis Whatever her surname is

How is adding this content to the page unintentional? ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 19:23, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry. I, for some reason, didn't look at the edit summaries. I am on RC patrol, and, frequently, I revert an article to a vandalized state (I wish some clever developer could develop some uber-RC tool that can detect vandalism and remove it, not just revert it). Sorry for making such a big deal about it, so feel free to give me, the unintentional hypocrite, a hard time about making the same mistake as you :P ~ Magnus animum _{(aka Steptrip)} 23:42, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Smeg.

This isn't the first time I've seen you on here. I'm a constant Wikipedian myself. Not that you care. SAN Hunter85014 20:02, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:NorthTexasTelevision.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NorthTexasTelevision.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've added the information. Thanks. Smeggysmeg (talk) 03:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:JBaird.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:JBaird.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by High on a tree (talk • contribs) 04:52, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of TeenSpot

I have nominated TeenSpot, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TeenSpot. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. -- pb30<talk> 18:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of teenspot

Not at all. The threshold for inclusion on that list is quite clear. The article doesn't meet the criteria. As it fails WP:WEB, which no one has addressed on the AfD. Whether the article is under afd or a speedy template, if its felt it doesn't meet the criteria we have long precedent in removing those articles until the issue is resolved.--Crossmr (talk) 01:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ZakAdama.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ZakAdama.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:25, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, Smeggysmeg! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 11:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TeenSpot.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TeenSpot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:25, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bruce Hall

Hey man I remember working on the Bruce Hall article with you, what happened to it? --NateDSaint (talk) 21:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well I agree that it was poorly written but I think it's pretty significant, especially given the amount of attention that Denton is getting lately (three new york times articles in the last year, mostly about growth and culture). I think a lot of people have been trying to find information on it, so I'd like to use wikipedia as a way to collect existing information and avoid it becoming a promotional article. I'll see what I can do. --NateDSaint (talk) 19:39, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter, March 2008

The Space-Time Telegraph

The WikiProject Doctor Who newsletter

Issue 1

March 2008

Project News: We have five new participants: Sm9800, Seanor3, T saston, Type 40, Jammy0002.; One editor has left the project: StuartDD.; The Doctor Who portal has expanded to increase the number of selected stories to 33.

Articles of note

New featured articles

None

New featured article candidates

Voyage of the Damned (Doctor Who) (FAC)

New good articles

Delisted articles: None

Proposals: A proposal for changing the layout of the episode pages is under way here.; A discussion about the formatting of the cast lists in episode pages is under way here.; A discussion to move United Nations Intelligence Taskforce to UNIT is under way here.
News: The Torchwood project has become a task-force under the project's scope.; The Torchwood series 2 finale airs on 4th April, and the 4th series of Doctor Who will start to air on 5th April.

For the Doctor Who project, Sceptre ^(talk) 19:23, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You have received this letter because you are on the newsletter recipients list. To opt-out, please remove your name.

The old Teenspot article

Sorry to see it was nominated for deletion and then deleted. I, for one, thought it was a good article at the time. ~SAN --Hunter85014 (talk) 01:01, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Spooks

Check out WP:SPO merge proposal. 20:05, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

We are in dire need of objectivity and common sense.

There is some controversy regarding the controversy regarding ITT Tech. I have a stated bias. (I guess maybe I should have kept that a secret.) At present the article is biased in the other direction. I would love it if you could take a look and leave a comment in the talk page.Veecort (talk) 03:48, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apple Juice

Thanks for reverting my blunder on the apple juice article, I corrected the vandalism first time and managed to completely fail the second - and I didn't notice... I was using Twinkle for the first time, all of two minutes, then tried to revert vandalism in progress, not a good idea I see from the result. You'll be glad to know that my curiosity has been sated and I'll now be leaving it to the more competent users in future :¬D Thanks, Jørdan 21:39, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Username block

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Smeggysmeg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

requested user name (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

My username is a reference to the fictional expletive "smeg" in Red Dwarf (for more information, see here), similar to "frak" from Battlestar Galactica, "frell" from Farscape, or "shazbot!" from Mork & Mindy. I don't believe a fictional expletive counts as an offensive word, and if it does then any user who has "frak" in their username should also be blocked (see here ) as well as any other fictional expletive. There is a belief by some that "smeg" refers to "smegma", but that is not a statement supported by the program's writers, and other fictional expletives are commonly permitted before watershed, supporting the notion that a fictional expletive is -not- offensive. I request that my ability to edit Wikipedia be unblocked and my username unmodified. Thank you Smeggysmeg (talk) 19:26, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Comments below. No need to change name. — Daniel Case (talk) 00:45, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined towards unblock - I don't regard the word smeg as offensive and haven't heard of Red Dwarf getting banned for offensive language, and Smeg (appliances) don't seem to have problems.... Peridon (talk) 20:31, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I would support unblock on the same grounds too -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:50, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Smeggysmeg. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Smeggysmeg (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by a web host block. This address is one from the Windscribe VPN service, and I understand anonymous edits being blocked by proxies, but I thought registered members with established accounts could still edit on otherwise blocked IP ranges. Smeggysmeg (talk) 17:27, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

It depends on the block, and if an IP range is "hard blocked" you'd need to have Wikipedia:IP block exemption to edit through it. That's only granted under special circumstances, and if you have a way to edit without going via a VPN then that would almost always be preferred. If, for some reason, VPN is the only way you can edit, please make a new unblock request and explain the circumstances. You'd also need to tell us the IP address that is blocked, but if you don't want to reveal it publicly you can make a request via WP:UTRS. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:43, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nomination of Zak Adama for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zak Adama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zak Adama until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cylon B (talk) 01:03, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Smeggysmeg. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zak Adama.
Message added 07:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:28, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neonteen/TeenSpot have been gone for ages now

Still here/alive/around, eh? Me too. (I left you the note on your talk page above about nine or ten years ago as Hunter85014) ChrisLeeNeal (talk) 10:16, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Smeggysmeg. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NTTV

The article NTTV has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG/ WP:ORG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 05:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Smeggysmeg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NTTV for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NTTV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NTTV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 01:07, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WIkiProject Doctor Who Newsletter: July 2024

The Space-Time Telegraph
Volume II, Issue I — July 2024
Brought to you by the editors of WikiProject Doctor Who

Okay–ooh. New ~~teeth~~ newsletter. That's weird...

Hello!

Welcome to the first regenerated issue of The Space-Time Telegraph, the official newsletter of WikiProject Doctor Who. We hope it finds you well in your safe travels across the Whoniverse! This newsletter was founded in 2008 and seemed to get lost in the time vortex quite quickly. Thanks to the Doctor dragging Sutekh through the time vortex and bringing life by bringing death to death (yeah... I'm a little confused too), it seems to have regenerated. The writing staff hopes to bring you future editions quarterly.

For this first edition, we have created an updated version of our mailing list that includes any active editors who previously had their usernames included in our participants list. If you do not wish to receive future editions, please remove your name from the mailing list. If you no longer wish to participate in the project, please also remove your name from the participants list.

I think that's enough about the newsletter for now. Let's dive into interesting things happening within the Doctor Who side of Wikipedia. Geronimooooo.....

Big Spike in Productivity

During 2024, the project has scored 8 GAs, 2 FLs and a GT, up from last year's 4 GAs and a GT. Several additional things are in the pipeline, with a bunch of things currently having been nominated with some mix of OlifanofmrTennant, TheDoctorWho, and Pokelego999 having their names attached to them. Allow me to look into the nominees.

Series 14: As of July 18th, every single episode has been sent to GAN, with "Boom", "73 Yards", and "The Devil's Chord" having made it to GA.
2023 Specials: Early in the year, as part of trying to not lose the WikiCup, Ollie sent "The Star Beast" (still salty about the move) to GAN. It was reviewed by frequent collaborator (fly high) of hers, but failed. She then fixed it up and sent it back where it passed. Later "The Giggle" was expanded and sent to GA, followed shortly by "Wild Blue Yonder". WBY received help by JustAnotherCompanion, a pretty fresh user. This other companion chose not to be listed as co-nom. A page was created for "Destination: Skaro" and quickly got GA status.
The Daleks' Master Plan was also sent to GAN by Rhain. It passed to join Rhain's other First Doctor content, being the fourth season three article to get the green check.
Peter Capaldi: The filmography and newly created awards of Capaldi were both sent to FLC and passed. Capaldi's main page was sent to GA, though due to some minor incompetence on the part of the nominator it was failed.

Proposals to the WikiProject

A recent proposal at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Doctor Who suggested potential improvements and suggestions for the main page of the project, as well as discussions about the project overall. The proposals are as follows:

The Task Forces section should be removed due to inactivity in the Torchwood Task Force, and a lack of significant interest in creating further Task Forces.
The freenode channel no longer works and should be removed due to most discussion taking place on site.
Due to the low quality of Lungbarrow and Jubilee despite being sample articles, these articles should either be removed as samples or improved. Additionally, the "sample device" has a very small application field, and should be removed from the sample articles section.
An updates infobox should be included, similarly to those used by Wikipedia:VGCHAR.
Radio Times's Doctor Who sections should be included in the references section due to their benefits for the project sourcing wise.
The Deletion Discussion archive should be removed, or have work invested in updating it, due to its lack of updates.

If you feel you have any thoughts or suggestions on these matters, or on any other matters pertaining to the project and its main page, feel free to chime in the ongoing discussion.

Discussions of Note

A move discussion is currently underway on whether or not Doctor Who series 14 should be moved to Doctor Who season 1 (2024). The discussion also involves conversation on a few other adjacent articles. If you have an opinion on the matter please read over the discussion or leave comments.

Contributors

TheDoctorWho (talk)
Pokelego999 (talk)
Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her)

If you wish to contribute to future editions of the newsletter, leave a message on the WikiProject talk page or reach out to one of the current contributors listed above.

If you do not wish to receive future editions of the Space-Time Telegraph, please remove your name from our our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WIkiProject Doctor Who: September 2024 Newsletter

The Space-Time Telegraph
Volume II, Issue II — September 2024
Brought to you by the editors of WikiProject Doctor Who

You like Doctor Who? What's his name then?

Welcome

Hello and welcome to the second issue of the new newsletter! Following the success of the first newsletter we are back to write more stuff.

Articles for deletion
Several articles have been nominated for deletion, such as Time War (Doctor Who), and several articles have been deleted, or merged or redirected, especially those relating to books, due to lack of WP:SIGCOV and WP:NBOOK. Editors can always help either by participating in the deletion discussions (which are noted on the project page), adding to such articles, or bringing attention to other such articles through AfD or the WikiProject talk page, to aid in clean-up.

Notice of Draft Articles
A new Doctor Who spin-off was announced at the 2024 San Diego Comic-Con, called The War Between the Land and the Sea, and will feature old and new Whoniverse characters working for UNIT as they battle the Sea Devils. The main space article currently redirects to Whoniverse, but collaboration is currently underway in a draft article. As filming on this miniseries has recently begun, its relocation to the mains space will presumably take place soon per the recommendations laid out at WP:NTV.

There is also a draft article in progress for the upcoming 2024 Christmas special. While this article won't be moved until the episode airs, any new contributions are welcome.

Doctor Who News
A small number of editors have recently raised questions regarding the reliability of Doctor Who News. This website is particularly used for information regarding viewing figures and the Appreciation Index of most episodes as well as some news information. If there is a better source for any information supported by this website, it should be replaced in good faith.

A full consensus on whether or not to remove the information that can't be supported by a different source has not yet been reached. Any editor who has opinions on this matter should contribute to the discussion on the WikiProject talk page.

Continued Progress Towards Good/Featured Content
There has been lots of progress made towards recognized articles in the last two months, related to such diverse categories as series, specials, lists and episodes A sub-page has also been added to the WikiProject, to list any possible goals we can aim towards.

Proposals Regarding the State of Fictional Elements Articles in the WikiProject

Several proposals have been laid out regarding fictional elements in the WikiProject, which includes fictional characters, locations, and more. Due to a concerning quality state regarding the large majority of them, several methods of tackling them in order to improve these articles' quality for the future have been proposed. The primary three proposals are as follows:

1. A priority list should be made to determine what articles are most pressing and in need of improvement in the WikiProject overall. Focus would be put onto important subjects and articles in a state of dubious notability that would make them viable for deletion processes such as AfD.

2. A group of articles is selected for improvement, which are ones deemed most relevant to the WikiProject for the future. Any lesser important subjects can be sidelined and worked on as editors see fit.

3. A long term goal is made to improve all elements. This will come at the caveat of taking significantly longer and requiring more heavy participation than the above two proposals, but would guarantee a slow and steady way to solve the issue.

If any editors are interested in chiming into the conversation and sharing their piece on how this should be handled, or if any editors wish to help with this proposal and improve fictional elements articles, then feel free to share thoughts at the discussion's section on the article's talk page.

Contributors

TheDoctorWho (talk)
Pokelego999 (talk)
Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her)
DoctorWhoFan91 (talk)

"I'm not appalled by it" - The New New York Times

If you wish to contribute to future editions of the newsletter or have any feedback, leave a message on the WikiProject talk page or reach out to one of the current contributors listed above.

If you do not wish to receive future editions of the Space-Time Telegraph, please remove your name from our our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]