User talk:CascadeUrbanite
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Welcome!
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia, SmartAn01! I am Admrboltz and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!
Admrboltz (talk) 23:17, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
- May I also suggest joining WikiProject Washington or WikiProject Seattle to work with a great set of contributors who are focused on the region. --Admrboltz (talk) 23:18, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Decemmber 8 - Wikipedia Loves Libraries Seattle - You're invited | |
---|---|
|
"Wiki Loves Libraries" edit-athon in Vancouver, WA
[edit]WIKI LOVES LIBRARIES 2013! You are invited to attend the upcoming "Wiki Loves Libraries" edit-athon. The event will be held from 2:30–4:30pm on Sunday, November 17, 2013 at the Vancouver Community Library (901 C Street) in Vancouver, Washington. The edit-athon will focus on creating and expanding articles related to Vancouver and Clark County. Details and signup here! |
---|
You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of WikiProjectOregon or WikiProject Washington. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:08, 9 November 2013 (UTC)
Get your cameras ready! Christmas in Oregon and PDX Pods
[edit]This month, WikiProject Oregon features two photo campaigns:
The concept is simple: upload photos of these two topics and share your work! Whether you upload one or one hundred, these images will help capture the culture of our state and illustrate Wikimedia projects. Have fun, and happy holiday season! You are receiving this because you are listed as an active member of WikiProject Oregon or WikiProject Washington. This message was delivered on behalf of Wikipedia:Meetup/Portland by EdwardsBot (talk) 19:42, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
KOMO-TV logo
[edit]I received your email; thanks! I wasn't doubting you, it was just one of those things I want to see it before I believe it... mostly because the website hasn't updated yet. Thanks again. Corkythehornetfan 01:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
[edit]You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here! |
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, SmartAn01. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, SmartAn01. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
2019 US Banknote Contest
[edit]US Banknote Contest | ||
---|---|---|
November-December 2019 | ||
There are an estimated 30,000 different varieties of United States banknotes, yet only a fraction of these are represented on Wikimedia Commons in the form of 2D scans. Additionally, Colonial America, the Confederate States, the Republic of Texas, multiple states and territories, communities, and private companies have issued banknotes that are in the public domain today but are absent from Commons. In the months of November and December, WikiProject Numismatics will be running a cross-wiki upload-a-thon, the 2019 US Banknote Contest. The goal of the contest is to increase the number of US banknote images available to content creators on all Wikimedia projects. Participants will claim points for uploading and importing 2D scans of US banknotes, and at the end of the contest all will receive awards. Whether you want to claim the Gold Wiki or you just want to have fun, all are invited to participate. If you do not want to receive invitations to future US Banknote Contests, follow the instructions here |
Sent by ZLEA at 23:30, 19 October 2019 (UTC) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for November 28
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ArenaBowl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albany Empire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Two World Trade Cenetr
[edit]Hello, SmartAn01
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Lithopsian and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Two World Trade Cenetr, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 21#Two World Trade Cenetr.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Lithopsian}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Lithopsian (talk) 19:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Citations
[edit]Just a heads-up: Citations and prose in articles about U.S. topics should use the MONTH DAY, YEAR format per MOS:DATETIES. Please keep this in mind, and thanks for adding the library citations to Mukilteo, Washington. SounderBruce 07:02, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
There's a reason the KCPQ infobox is a bit different—it's because I want the other infoboxes to be like it (not the other way around!). I've been trying to pare back the excessive detail that has long been a part of TV station infoboxes after reading MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE. Also, I'm trying to add alt text to more logos for accessibility purposes—it's also a necessity for a good article (the page has been pending at GAN for about a month). Hopefully this explains what I've been doing. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: Sorry, I understand that; I tried to rely on the documentation for Template:Infobox television station. I defaulted to using other station articles for precedent since the documentation is woefully sparse at the moment. I think it would be best to update the documentation while this article is undergoing GAN so that nobody else makes the same error as me; I remember a similar discussion on infobox templates occurring when I edited the KeyArena infobox. --SmartAn01 (talk) 21:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Sometimes, getting this project to look at the MOS is like leading a recalcitrant horse to water. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 21:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: I'll try to update the documentation now with your suggestions. I still think we need to differentiate between O&O and just affiliate networks, but I guess we'll deal with that later for now. --SmartAn01 (talk) 22:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- At some point, I'll sift through the documentation. I did a massive overhaul on that infobox last year, which mostly affected parameter names and harmonized the whole thing with the radio station box. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:03, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: I'll try to update the documentation now with your suggestions. I still think we need to differentiate between O&O and just affiliate networks, but I guess we'll deal with that later for now. --SmartAn01 (talk) 22:14, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Sometimes, getting this project to look at the MOS is like leading a recalcitrant horse to water. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 21:44, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]DYK nomination of Longacres
[edit]Hello! Your submission of Longacres at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! GRuban (talk) 17:11, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Longacres
[edit]On 14 March 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Longacres, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the site of Longacres has been home to a dairy farm, a horse racetrack, headquarters of a Boeing division, and a potential new facility for Seattle Sounders FC? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Longacres. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Longacres), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, SmartAn01
Thank you for creating Continental Mortgage and Loan Company.
User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thanks for the redirect!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:44, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Flag of Seattle COI clarification
[edit]Hi SmartAn01,
Thank you for helping me understanding more information about Wikipedia's COI disclosure - I've added a disclosure to my user page now to ensure clarity about my roles. But I'm still unclear what I should do if I am a subject matter expert with primary source information but also has a non-profit relating to a Wikipedia page? From my current understanding, it seems that due to conflict of interest rules, I would not be able to improve a page I have extensive knowledge about given I work on the topic for said page, how best should we work to ensure that this page has all the appropriate, neutral information about the topic?
Thanks!
Jackson Jackson Ridl (talk) 16:39, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Jackson Ridl You can still make edit requests and suggestions for reliable sources in the article's talk page; per WP:COIADVICE, you are also welcome to make unambiguous uncontroversial edits. I don't have significant experience on such matters myself, so I would defer to the article's talk page for further clarification. SmartAn01 (talk) 19:40, 15 July 2022 (UTC)
DYK for Nintendo Entertainment System models
[edit]On 19 August 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nintendo Entertainment System models, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sharp Corporation produced three official variants of Nintendo's Famicom in Japan, one of which was a television set that was subsequently released in the United States? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nintendo Entertainment System models. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nintendo Entertainment System models), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:MLB Sunday Leadoff logo 2022.svg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:MLB Sunday Leadoff logo 2022.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 14 October 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ESPN on ABC logo
[edit]Hello, CascadeUrbanite, I was wondering if you would please colorize File:ESPN on ABC logo 2022.svg? I've tried doing it myself, but the ABC logo didn't turn out the way I would have liked it to. My sources for the proposed re-colorized logos are per NBA.com: ESPN logo & ABC logo. Charlesaaronthompson (talk) 05:12, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Charlesaaronthompson With my recreation, I would prefer to keep it as close to the original logo as possible to avoid any permission issues; since Disney has exclusively displayed the logo in monochrome as of this post, I am concerned that creating a colored version of the recreation could potentially run afoul of the company's trademark rules even if the logo itself is in the public domain. If you want, you may raise this logo at WP:IMAGEHELP and seek clarification from other editors; I may reconsider your suggestion if they approve it, but I must decline at this time, especially as I devote time to my university studies. With that, I apologize, but thank you for understanding regardless. CascadeUrbanite (talk) 06:04, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
- OK. I do understand. I will leave it alone for now. Thank you for your explanation. Charlesaaronthompson (talk) 06:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Media player Windows11
[edit]This software has now been launched on Windows 10. Does this article need to be renamed, because this software is no longer exclusive to Windows 11. 2401:E180:8822:D47E:BB49:9BFB:9903:330D (talk) 04:06, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- Since you're talking about Media Player (Windows 11), I would say yes under normal circumstances. However, Media Player (Windows) already redirects to the traditional Windows Media Player application, which makes such a name change complicated in terms of distinguishing between the two, especially considering that it is still included in Windows alongside the newer player. I will try to place a move request on the article so we can generate suggestions for appropriate names; I may also suggest a merge/split with the Groove Music article since the new player is a direct successor to it. CascadeUrbanite (talk) 05:45, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
- I brought up a Talk in Media Player (Windows 11) and would like to invite you to participate in the discussion. 61.216.108.177 (talk) 03:16, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- The part about Groove Music/Media Player (2022) in the Windows Media Player article hopes that you can help update Groove Music is not exclusive to Windows 10. Windows 11 was also built in and was replaced by Media Player (2022) after 2022. And 2023 At that time, Media Player (2022) has also replaced Groove Music in Windows 10. I hope you can help rewrite part of the description in the Windows Media Player article that mentions Groove Music/Media Player (2022). 2401:E180:8862:D75A:F93B:2C1F:D811:C91A (talk) 16:40, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- Groove Music was also included in Windows 11. Should the beginning of the article be adjusted? 112.104.154.95 (talk) 18:13, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- Can you help reword this paragraph in the Windows Media Player article. Groove Music is not exclusive to Windows 10. Windows 11 had it too. "Windows 8 bundled Windows Media Player 12 along two other media player apps, namely Xbox Video and Xbox Music. The latter was renamed Groove Music in Windows 10, and then finally Media Player in Windows 11.[4] In January 2023, Microsoft began backporting the latter to Windows 10.[5] Windows RT does not run Windows Media Player , but comes with Xbox Video and Xbox Music.” 61.216.108.177 (talk) 02:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Seattle Wiknic 2023
[edit]
|
Nomination of Nintendo Entertainment System models for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nintendo Entertainment System models until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:35, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:KYVE logo 2006.svg
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:KYVE logo 2006.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Meetup in Seattle on 16 January 2024
[edit]Seattle Wikimedia meetup | 16 January 2024 | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are on our mailing list. To opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from the list. |
(t · c) buidhe 05:30, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Seattle March 2024 Events
[edit]There are a couple of events this month that we hope are of interest to you. | |
Tuesday, March 12 2024 3pm – 7pm (PDT), Seattle articles edit-a-thon, Seattle Public Library University Branch | |
This edit-a-thon is based on importance or popularity (as determined by pageviews, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Seattle/Popular pages; or main articles, such as those linked in Template:Seattle; also see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Seattle articles by quality statistics). | |
Tuesday March 19 2024 6pm – 8pm (PDT), March monthly meetup, Little Oddfellows Café—new location!!! | |
Since our previous meeting place, Distant Worlds Café, now closes at 6:30pm, we will meet this month at Little Oddfellows café inside of Elliott Bay Book Company in Capitol Hill. |
To subscribe to or unsubscribe from messages from Wikipedia:Meetup/Portland, please add or remove your name here.
I am really happy to see someone working on this article and would love to join in with stuff you may not have access to, plus Maiacosis. Are either of you on WP:DISCORD? I'd love to connect there and join the effort. I have ample experience in writing TV stations: KCPQ is an FA along with three other pages plus about 120 TV station GAs and another 160 GA-quality pages awaiting consideration someday. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 20:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've just joined the Discord! Maiacosis (talk) 04:08, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie @Maiacosis: I'm interested in fleshing out the article more to get it up to at least GA status, but I haven't prioritized it as of now since my various life commitments since graduation have meant a significant decrease in the amount of time I can and want to invest in Wikipedia without interfering with them. I can join the Discord to coordinate on what to prioritize, but I may not contribute as frequently as either of you. If anything, Maiacosis is welcome to join the next WP:Meetup/Seattle since I'll likely attend it; they may also gain some useful advice from Peaceray and/or SounderBruce if they also attend the meetup. CascadeUrbanite (talk) 03:13, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- The Discord is a great resource, and I'd love to see you there, even if you can't take the lead on this one. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 03:26, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi everyone! I am currently writing this on an Italian train's WiFi. I am back in the US next week, but May is already booked (SIFF among other things), so it will be at least June before I can help. Peaceray (talk) 10:34, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Seattle Wiknic 11 August 2024
[edit]2024 Seattle Wiknic | 11 August 2024 | |
| |
You're receiving this message because you are on our mailing list. To opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from the list. |
(t · c) buidhe 04:37, 1 August 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
The Pacific Northwest Bell and her Wikipedia article
[edit]How could the information sources cited not represent 1994 for the year during which Pacific Northwest Bell went officially defunct or dormant? Because I searched Google, Yahoo and Bing and found three quarters of a dozen information website places which indicated otherwise. Furtherly, I contacted them myself three years ago; some Lumen Technologies officials mentioned that the network was defunct or dormant from 1994 and afterwards. Wikipedia needs better quality sources in all articles cause otherwise we would not have a good encyclopedia. Angela Kate Maureen Pears 15:09, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
- Unless the subject of the Lumen correspondence was publicized or otherwise discussed by independent reliable sources, other readers would not have any means to verify any statements based on it. As of now, the correspondence itself would constitute original research, which is strongly forbidden on Wikipedia; please see WP:BIT if you need further explanation. As for the linked pages, I did not see any explicit mention of that 1994 claim, nor do I think they would hold up as sources should the article ever be improved enough to undergo a good article nomination. In particular, the Bell System Memorial site would likely be considered a self-published source by other editors, and its usage of Wikipedia as a reference would effectively disqualify it as a reference on Wikipedia in violation of WP:CIRC. If anything, I would recommend looking through the books they listed or searching for books about Pacific Northwest Bell to find information since they largely seem to be published traditionally and/or written by established subject-matter experts. Other than archived newspaper articles from within PNW Bell's service area, books may be the only realistic option to obtain any extensive information about it since its direct presence waned and was mixed with US West as the Internet grew; even though it is a Seattle-based institution that hasn't existed for 30+ years, it would likely be unrecognizable and irrelevant to most people in its area now. CascadeUrbanite (talk) 07:55, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
- In other words: Although the subject may be true, not just any source can be used on Wikipedia. You're trying to say the Bell System Memorial site might have been unreliable in the terms of sources though it refers to Bell Companies then and now. And it's not enough for when it's true cause there's verification that is required on Wikipedia sites. Angela Kate Maureen Pears 17:59, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
- Essentially, yes. While a reference is not required to be available in online form, other editors should be able to locate the information cited from it if they have the means to access it; the accessibility of a source to editors is irrelevant to the quality of its work. Even though the Bell System Memorial site is apparently backed by a legal entity and is not openly editable, one could argue its content is more expected of a fansite rather than a historical society. The fact that barely any, if not no other reliable source has cited it in any of their Bell System-related articles published in the past decade says much about its lack of credibility as an authority on the subject among them, and it may never reach that status with the Bell System so far removed from public consciousness; I also noticed that some of the site's content leans into promotional territory, which may affect its reliability. As anyone can claim to be an expert on a subject, we cannot afford to loosely apply our standards when searching for information to add and cite, especially with the state of the Internet now. CascadeUrbanite (talk) 09:22, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarifying. If that Bell System website may be questionable or dubious I will never use that as a cite here on Wikipedia again. I also wish you Merry Christmas two thousand twenty four and Happy New Year for two thousand twenty five. I'm devoted to editing Wikipedia for years to come. Angela Kate Maureen Pears 03:21, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- To be clear, I am not trying to disparage the people who provided content to the site; I understand their interest in sharing their experiences with the Bell System, either directly or indirectly. Unfortunately, incidents on Wikipedia like Essjay and Zhemao underline the lengths that some people can go to in creating hoaxes with their supposed credentials, highlighting the need to scrutinize sources no matter how detailed or well-intentioned they are on a given subject; as the saying goes, take unverified claims/accounts with a grain of salt. I would suggest attending the next Minnesota or Chicago meetup to correspond with other editors firsthand and gain experience on sourcing information and writing content for specific article topics. Regardless, thank you for your cooperation and understanding, and best of luck to you in your Wikipedia endeavors. CascadeUrbanite (talk) 09:41, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the clarifying. If that Bell System website may be questionable or dubious I will never use that as a cite here on Wikipedia again. I also wish you Merry Christmas two thousand twenty four and Happy New Year for two thousand twenty five. I'm devoted to editing Wikipedia for years to come. Angela Kate Maureen Pears 03:21, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Essentially, yes. While a reference is not required to be available in online form, other editors should be able to locate the information cited from it if they have the means to access it; the accessibility of a source to editors is irrelevant to the quality of its work. Even though the Bell System Memorial site is apparently backed by a legal entity and is not openly editable, one could argue its content is more expected of a fansite rather than a historical society. The fact that barely any, if not no other reliable source has cited it in any of their Bell System-related articles published in the past decade says much about its lack of credibility as an authority on the subject among them, and it may never reach that status with the Bell System so far removed from public consciousness; I also noticed that some of the site's content leans into promotional territory, which may affect its reliability. As anyone can claim to be an expert on a subject, we cannot afford to loosely apply our standards when searching for information to add and cite, especially with the state of the Internet now. CascadeUrbanite (talk) 09:22, 14 December 2024 (UTC)