User talk:Slippy Sausage

Welcome!

Hi Slippy Sausage! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 331dot (talk) 12:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Your attitude needs to dramatically change, and you need to listen to what everyone is telling you. 331dot (talk) 17:07, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

331dot I never disrupted wikipedia. Slippy Sausage (talk) 17:08, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your attitude is disruptive to Wikipedia. If it does not change soon, your already low chances of the community granting you the admin tools will disappear. 331dot (talk) 17:11, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey 331dot I never intended to disrespect any user I just feel like I've a better understanding of wikipedia's guidelines than many users who've been here for years. I truly believe I'll be a net positive as an admin. Slippy Sausage (talk) 17:14, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of throwing your weight around by telling people you know more than they do, demonstrate your knowledge of policies through your actions. If you want the community to grant you the admin toolset, you need to respect and be civil towards that community. If you aren't, they will be there to oppose granting you the tools in any RFA you undertake.

Many are also skeptical of people who go out and seek the admin tools from day one. Instead of that, just concentrate on being a good editor. If you are, the community will organically see your need for the tools. 331dot (talk) 17:19, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also see Wikipedia:Adminship is not for new users. Theroadislong (talk) 17:20, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I also again emphasize that you being given the tools is probably years away. 331dot (talk) 17:21, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

331dot, david notMD was accusing me of using multiple accounts without evidence and I couldn't tolerate that so I behaved in a rather rude manner. Slippy Sausage (talk) 17:40, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You weren't "accused", they said they had suspicion. Doing the same thing as another account is certainly cause for suspicion. If it's not true, all you need to say is that. 331dot (talk) 18:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 06:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]