User talk:Slayer9004

Welcome!

Hello, Slayer9004, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 18:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

October 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 19:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Slayer9004 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Doug Weller: I wrote this JJMC89 (check his talk page history which he has hidden) "Can you please explain your claims regarding sock-puppetry ? I had this account since 2013, so how come that I am a puppet of another account?! To be honest, I was asked by a friend who has his account blocked to retrieve some reliably sources content so I checked the content and I reedited some of them, like the articles where he mainly added some coordinates for cities, personal data of political figures and some others ! I am not the same person so do you want to delete my content as well ?! I did nothing wrong, I only brought back some old data which I have checked myself ! so I kindly you ask to be fair regarding this issue, it is contributing, nothing personal here ! I hope that we communicate to solve this problem ! " Then he kept reverting MY EDITS over and over again ! Should I be blocked as well for using the same content ?! How come that I am disruptive ?! show me one example of my edits in which I vandalized an article, if not I demand to bring back my content and a warning to that user who kept reverting edits more than 3 times on each article ! Slayer9004 (talk) 21:31, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

So you just confirmed you served as a meatpuppet to do proxy edits on behalf of a blocked sockpuppeteer. Also, the content was not reliably sourced, at least in part. Huon (talk) 22:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Doug Weller talk 08:59, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, now all the sock templates need to be changed, thanks for pointing out how old your account is. You are not a sockpuppet, you are a sockmaster. I've reblocked you as a checkuser block. Doug Weller talk 09:02, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]