User talk:Sky0000

El Rostro de la Venganza

Good, I want to ask you to please stop and stop putting unnecessary content in the aforementioned article, I hope you can understand it thanks.--GeorgeMilan (Talk) 16:15, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

This section is irrelevant part of having references; attracts vandalism parts anonymous users and therefore this section has been removed from all items of soap operas as irrelevant to wikipedia part is not a forum or magazine gossip telenovelas that's the page Telemundo where you can find the description of each character.--GeorgeMilan (Talk) 20:42, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Re:Fill out the cast

Hello, first of all, if you want to add a section synopsis can do it as long as it's not plagiarism. With the other, the cast section should not take irrelevant information, Wikipedia policies say.--GeorgeMilan / talk 14:47, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Re:Why you revert important information?

Sorry, but wikipedia does not analyze the characters, that goes against the style manual wikipedia Yet another reversal and have to request the intervention of an administrator of wikipedia.--Jorge Horan (talk) 17:15, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

I have not contacted anyone, because do not revert back to my issue. It's clear that this is an encyclopedia not a soap opera blog. Add it falls on primary sources. Please understand, Wikipedia is not a blog for fans. If you do not like it read the manual of style and if you wish you can pass the link. For you see it.--Jorge Horan (talk) 21:19, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

It will be his last reversal is more, and I'll have to go ask for help from a manager wikipedia for you intervene, such information is unnecessary, and explain it if you do not want to understand it is their business. If anyone wants to know the characters as you see the telenovela died. that it exists. Wikipedia does not analyze the characters. and explain it and this will be my last post.--Jorge Horan (talk) 11:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Please attend reasons, as I explained. His behavior is inappropriate..--Jorge Horan (talk) 13:33, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to En Otra Piel, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 14:09, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to La Impostora. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 14:10, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Sky0000 reported by User:Solarra (Result: ). Thank you. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 16:19, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for violating WP:3RR at En Otra Piel and edit warring in other articles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bbb23 (talk) 17:55, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

It will continue with the same?

Already have given enough reasons and you do not seem to care at all; to continue, I will have to request the blocking of your account.--Jorge Horan (talk) 13:16, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Oh, now you're going to use puppet accounts to enforce your issue?. Please stop already gave sufficient explanation.--Jorge Horan (talk) 13:45, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

And still continues to deny, whatever?; I will reverse because their issues are not correct, and I was given reasons why your edits are reverted, and you do not want to understand it, I can do nothing.--Chema (talk) 23:26, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Last post

Please continue adding unnecessary information, this information does not help the article. See; MOS and What Wikipedia is not. It will continue with the same?, And I have given thousands of reasons, and you do not want to understand. so I can not do anything.--Chema (talk) 14:36, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

June 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for sock puppetry (User:Bbbbb000). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Bbb23 (talk) 23:43, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Blocked from editing

You have been blocked from editing for a period of three months for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sky0000. Multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Any contributions made while evading blocks or bans can be reverted or deleted without discussion. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

• Your block has been made indefinite for creating another sock account.--Bbb23 (talk) 08:32, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sky0000, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Damián ^(talk) 14:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sky0000, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Nthep (talk) 16:16, 9 September 2014 (UTC)