User talk:Sirio

Welcome!

Hi Sirio! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 03:39, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dewesoft

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dewesoft, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrOllie (talk) 18:57, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

FUCK YOU, I DIDN'T FINISH EDITING THE PAGE, ADDING REFERENCES AND MORE DATA, AND YOU TELL ME I'M DOING A PROMOTION? SO ALL WIKIPEDIA IS PROMOTION, ADVERTISING AND FAKE NEWS. DON'T BOTHER ME AND LET ME DO MY JOB. Sirio (talk) 19:17, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is an obvious advert for a company with an extensive history of paid editing on Wikipedia, no amount of all caps shouting will change that. MrOllie (talk) 19:57, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You get paid by wikipedia to fuck around and censor articles written by volunteers who waste time like me.

No one pays me to waste time with your stupidities, your censorship will not change this. Sirio (talk) 20:19, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dewesoft

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dewesoft, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:55, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you have mental problems, you must attach verified evidence, to verify and corroborate before a prosecutor, that the Dewesoft Wikipedia article can be taken as financed advertising, and my link as a user in this regard.

One Fact: My IP address is from Argentina, so you will have to prove in your complaint to the court, the way in which the Dewesoft company, from Slovenia, has contacted me, to "promote their page". Sirio (talk) 22:41, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not bound by the laws of Argentina and we are free to remove what does not abide by our policies without requirement for legal intervention; this is the very definition of free speech. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 22:59, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.PRAXIDICAE💕 22:47, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Permalink to ANI thread for context for future unblock reviewers --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:29, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 22:48, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sirio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

They censored an article, with the allegation that I am advertising a company and TheDragonFire300 they talk to me about freedom of expression.I have no connection at all with the Dewesoft company and I am not interested in advertising to anyone, I have a good reputation for making several articles that have been accepted, but on the Dewesoft page, they have dedicated themselves to censoring me, in a ridiculous and authoritarian way. Sirio (talk) 00:23, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. SQL ^{Query Me!} 01:31, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your unblock request fails to address the reason for you getting blocked in any way whatsoever; namely that you attacked other editors who tried to question you and attempted a completely ridiculous legal threat. Instead, it merely blames other editors for your predicament and cries about being censored which you have no proof of. I recommend declining this unblock request. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 01:25, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sirio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't understand the reason for the block, you ask Sphilbrick, Seraphimblade and TheDragonFire300, who say that the Dewesoft page that I made on May 20, 2022 is advertising and that crap that I don't care about, MrOllie had already deleted that page at 09:55, October 23 2020, for the same reason, I didn't know, but it's absurd. MrOllie has been deleting my contributions. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/Sirio https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Livestreaming&type=revision&diff=1088902740&oldid=1088041709&diffmode=source https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Ribbon_(computing)&type=revision&diff=1088902689&oldid=1087702362&diffmode=source https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=MATLAB&type=revision&diff=1088935125&oldid=1072711713&diffmode=source

I don't consume advertising, I don't watch advertising on TV, or on YouTube, I hate advertising, so if an article is deleted with the excuse that I advertise a company, of course I'm going to get very angry. It is unfair and I will not allow it. The user MrOllie is censoring all my contributions, vomiting his repressed hatred towards me, I have more than 100 contributions to the article that yes, they are considered "encyclopedic", 3 of which the user MrOllie does not want them to see. I repeat it again, I only make contributions that I consider important only for information, as I have been doing for 2 years, the damage is being done to me, just because of a simple confusion and without any investigation. As I told the user TheDragonFire300, to make a complaint against me and investigate my involvement with the company to advertise it on Wikipedia.

also add the requirement to permanently block users MrOllie, Sphilbrick, Seraphimblade and TheDragonFire300, They never wanted to give me explanations. ,Sirio (talk) 02:32, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I could maybe be convinced that you haven't been intentionally adding promotional materal, but your unblock requests only solidify my impression, formed based on the evidence presented at ANI, that you are not able to coöperate with other editors. This is a collaborative project. If you would like to be unblocked, you will need to show that you are capable of defusing tensions, not tossing around insinuations and demanding that other users be blocked. I would encourage you to take a week or two to think this matter over before requesting unblock again. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 03:26, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

An unblock request that simply asks for others to be blocked instead of or in addition to being unblocked is the very definition of WP:NOTTHEM and is an example of an WP:EBUR. Also, I have done absolutely nothing wrong, and I haven't even commented on the article that you're getting so upset about; my advice is purely to do with policies on Wikipedia, such as advising you that you are in breach of WP:NLT. I recommend revoking talk page access; you are clearly wasting our time. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 02:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict)::I'll leave this undeclined in hopes you rewrite it before a member of the unblock review team sees it. Please read the Guide to Appealing Blocks. To be unblocked, you must describe how your conduct merited a block and how you would do things differently under similar circumstances. Please do not compalin about others. Please focus on your own conduct. Best --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:42, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What you call "censorship" is curation. Encyclopedias are curated content. Please read up on WP:dispute resolution. And WP:CIVIL. And WP:NPA. Please read the instruction for contesting a speedy deletion in the notice that your page had been tagged for deletion. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:58, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're likely going to find your talk page access revoked, Sirio. I would seriously recommend that you delete your current block review, and rethink how you should go about your appeal. Here's a tip: your appeal shouldn't be demanding anything. -- Rockstone^{Send me a message!} 02:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Though well intentioned, you are only inflaming the situation. Please. Don't. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:59, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TheDragonFire300 Don't play the victim, I'm telling you to report me to justice, if you think I'm advertising. I know who is involved in this problem, the users Seraphimblade and Sphilbrick for deleting my page and the user MrOllie for deleting my contributions in other articles, as if he deleted evidence of my activities for 2 years. I had the obligation or responsibility to contribute and collaborate, but when the mentioned users violated this responsibility, I demanded my right to withdraw. They do something unacceptable and they don't want me to get mad, sorry, I have a temper, I'm not a Bot, I'm human.

Please don't engage with them It's only making matters worse. I left you sound advice on how to rewrite your unblock request. Won't you calm down enough to follow it? --Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:09, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're gone, I have no qualms about replying to this. I never said you were advertising, so I'm not sure why you've still got that in your head. You can check my contribs all you want, but any accusations from me about you advertsing are pure fantasy. Regards, User:TheDragonFire300. (Contact me | Contributions). 02:30, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just an observation that "My IP address is from Argentina, so you will have to prove in your complaint to the court, the way in which the Dewesoft company, from Slovenia, has contacted me, to "promote their page"" is perhaps a little disingenuous, as Dewesoft has an agent in Argentina. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:05, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
PS: Just to add I'm not suggesting this means there is a connection (I can't see anything obvious), I'm really just advising that the "I'm in a different country, so I can't have a connection" approach really doesn't mean anything when it comes to companies with global distribution. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:25, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And here's a Tweet that might be interesting too - https://twitter.com/SkylarAstarot/status/1527840610719260672. Attacking other Wikipedia editors off-wiki isn't very nice. (Note the user has self-identified on their user page, so this is not outing) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:19, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, you can heed my advice in your next unblock request. Once unblocked, you can appeal the page deletion at WP:DRV. But first, you need to show a working knowledge of WP:dispute resolution, As a wise man once said, it's fine for us to disagree, so long as we don't do it disagreeably. Best. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 11:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This unblock request is very puzzling. Minkai (boop that talk button!-contribs-ANI Hall of Fame) 13:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sirio (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If you want me to apologize, well, I apologize, but don't demand collaboration from me, when they delete my content, and not only the Dewesoft page, but others, deleted by MrOllie, contribute? I have contributed for two years, without any problem, now will they apologize for the intentional censorship? I am calm, but they do not have the courage to calm the situation. REQUEST IMMEDIATE UNLOCKING. Sirio (talk) 18:34, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Declined. If you can't edit collaboratively here, Wikipedia isn't the place for you. Yamla (talk) 19:20, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is censorship, dictatorial authoritarianism, and I will defend myself to the fullest extent of the law. Who the hell do they think they are. The world is no place for you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sirio (talk • contribs)