User talk:SimonP/Archive 10
This is an archive of past discussions with User:SimonP. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 |
I have nominated Read my lips: no new taxes for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. -- Peter Talk page 17:34, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hello Simon, if you take this on, let me know if you need any help. – Lionel (talk) 00:34, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of 476 A.D. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 476 A.D. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/476 A.D. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Edison (talk) 04:14, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- Clearly this is a quality article about a notable year, but it was hijacked for a time by a spammy article about a movie dealing with the twilight of Imperial Rome. The AFD needs a speedy close. Edison (talk) 04:23, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Warning!
This is a warning that your bot, I'm a boy, has been blocked from Wikipedia indefinitely due to constant vandalism of Wikipedia articles. Discuss this on my talk page if you have any problems. Jayemd (talk) 13:22, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Category:Districts of London
Category:Districts of London, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 00:47, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Category:Old provinces of Japan
Category:Old provinces of Japan, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:23, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Raymond Maury for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Raymond Maury is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Maury until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:54, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I note you uploaded this media, would you mind expanding the fair use rationale so it addresses ALL 10 points of WP:NFCC?Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:17, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Shidane Arone.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Shidane Arone.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian elections/National
A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian elections/National requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 06:56, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian elections/Canadian Action
A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian elections/Canadian Action requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 07:02, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian elections/Rhino
A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian elections/Rhino requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 00:05, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian elections/Libertarian
A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian elections/Libertarian requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 04:58, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian elections/Natural Law
A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian elections/Natural Law requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 05:14, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian elections/Abolitionist
A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian elections/Abolitionist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 05:17, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian elections/CHP
A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian elections/CHP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 05:24, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian elections/Canadian Alliance
A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian elections/Canadian Alliance requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 05:31, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian elections/Reform
A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian elections/Reform requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 05:43, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian elections/Green
A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian elections/Green requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 06:28, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian elections/Marxist–Leninist
A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian elections/Marxist–Leninist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 06:49, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian elections/Not affiliated
A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian elections/Not affiliated requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 06:54, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian elections/Social Credit
A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian elections/Social Credit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 07:08, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian elections/NDP
A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian elections/NDP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 07:43, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian elections/Progressive Conservatives requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 09:11, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Canadian elections/Independent
A tag has been placed on Template:Canadian elections/Independent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it must be substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>
).
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. —Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 03:29, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
I recall that you had added the section there on "Debate over literalness" and knew the refs. A pile of fact tags were added there by another user. If you want to address and add refs please do, else I will have to trim it way back and add a few refs to get rid of the tags. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 17:48, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
Just to let you know
You have been mentioned at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Editor_Retention#How_deletions_damage_efforts_to_retain_editors Ottawahitech (talk) 14:36, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Claudia Domenica Zacchara
A tag has been placed on Claudia Domenica Zacchara, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kelly Marie 0812 (talk) 04:15, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Presenting HK's status
Mind sharing with us your two cents (at WP talk:WPHK)? 14.0.208.97 (talk) 01:27, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matthew 10:1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Disciples (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
April - National Contribution Month
During the month of April, Wikimedia Canada is preparing the National Contribution Month, and we are looking for experienced contributors to organize a contribution day (or half-day) in their region.
Contribution days are activities where Wikipedia's contributors, students, or anybody interested in contributing to Wikipedia meets together to collectively improve a predetermined theme. This meetings generally take place in library where references are easy of access, but can be organized in any communal room. Beside improving articles, a goal of this participatory workshops is to initiate neophyte in the cooperative contribution of Wikipedia.
If you are interested in organizing or participating in a contribution day in your region, communicate witht he national team on the project's talk page. The exact agenda of each local event is left to the discretion of the organizer. Help is available for the organization from contributors who already organized these type of days, so don't be worried. If you have any questions or want more information, don't hesitate to contact us.Benoit Rochon (talk) 00:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
FAR
I have nominated Kingdom of Makuria for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Dana boomer (talk) 15:24, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Invitation to join the Ten Year Society
Dear Simon,
I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Ten Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for ten years or more.
Best regards, — Hex (❝?!❞) 10:52, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Your contributed article, Ducks
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Ducks. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Duck. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Duck – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.
If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 16:44, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Clayton Matchee for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clayton Matchee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clayton Matchee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheGrappler (talk) 22:56, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
Spud gun (version 2) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Spud gun (version 2). Since you had some involvement with the Spud gun (version 2) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). uKER (talk) 15:39, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Kirkville listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kirkville. Since you had some involvement with the Kirkville redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:29, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
Victoria Village/Bermondsey area maps
The neighbourhood maps you have submitted for the above areas incorrectly show parma court ( infact, they show different city blocks as parma court in each image ) Please update these maps from the toronto city area boundaries for for neighbourhood #43: http://www.toronto.ca/demographics/cns_profiles/cns43.htm
Anoneditor3944 (talk) 16:34, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Request to take part in a survey
Hi there. I would very much appreciate it if you could spend ~2 minutes and take a short survey - a project trying to understand why the most active Wikipedia contributors (such as yourself) may reduce their activity, or retire. I sent you an email with details, if you did not get it please send me a wikiemail, so that I can send you an email with the survey questions. I would very much appreciate your cooperation, as you are among the most active Wikipedia editors who show a pattern of reduced activity, and thus your response would be extremely valuable. Thanks! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 13:02, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. at any time by removing the
File:Polka dots.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Polka dots.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:58, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
I guess it was better just to delete the whole thing. I found the article online and put some of the relevant information in Aunt Jemima.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 15:48, 14 August 2013 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Zero interest-rate policy
An article that you have been involved in editing, Zero interest-rate policy, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. greenrd (talk) 22:06, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
September 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Baj Pomorski Theater may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- *Krzysztof Arciszewski] (1988–1992),
- making it into one of the best equipped stages in Poland; he displayed a premiere for adults (the first of its kind for the theater – a Polish preview puppet show of [[William Shakespeare|
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:37, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Northern Elite League, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Sault Ste. Marie, North Bay and Sudbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Memoirs of the twentieth century
Thanks for the article Memoirs of the Twentieth Century. The word tartar however links to a disambiguation page. I think the correct word must be Tatars. Cheers. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 17:57, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Memoirs of the Twentieth Century, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ottoman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Lois Utz in Little Falls
When you added Lois Utz as a notable in the article for Little Falls, New Jersey in this edit, had you seen the actual obituary in the Star-Ledger listed as a reference? I am unable to find any support for the claim, despite persistent searches through the archives. Alansohn (talk) 17:15, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 19:05, 4 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
The last message in the thread is for you. Cheers! —Unforgettableid (talk) 19:05, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Refimrpove and BPL Sources
Not sure you understand what those mean since you're removing them indicating that they're "sourced". The templates don't mean that there are no sources at all but that more sources are required. Please revert. You could also spend some time looking for more sources. Walter Görlitz (talk) 00:07, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I should have been clearer with my edit summaries. I'm well aware of what the template means, and looking at those articles they seem reasonably well sourced. I also compared them to the versions that existed when the original tag signalling the problem was placed, and in those cases the problems looked to have been solved. For an article like Roland Robertson do you believe it still needs the warning? Every statement on the page is found in one of the references or links. - SimonP (talk) 00:57, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- But acceptance testing does not have enough sources. Daniel Viglietti could use more. I could list them all, but yes, you could have explained better and should have checked a bit more. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:03, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'm happy to defer to you on those. I looked at when the ref improve tag was added to Acceptance Testing seven years ago, and the refs have much improved since then. It may also be at the point where specific citation needed tags would be more useful. - SimonP (talk) 01:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- While adding specific CN tags might be preferable for some of those articles now, what you did was remove the page-level tag and didn't add individual CN tags. That's not an improvement, although you meant well and I understand your actions better. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:17, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- I'm happy to defer to you on those. I looked at when the ref improve tag was added to Acceptance Testing seven years ago, and the refs have much improved since then. It may also be at the point where specific citation needed tags would be more useful. - SimonP (talk) 01:12, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
- But acceptance testing does not have enough sources. Daniel Viglietti could use more. I could list them all, but yes, you could have explained better and should have checked a bit more. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:03, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Final Quality Audit, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hardware (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
File:Joseph's Dream in the Stable.jpg missing description details
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 04:35, 23 October 2013 (UTC)November 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Matthew 27:2 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Sherwin-White]]<ref>[[A. N. Sherwin-White]]. ''Roman Society and Roman Law in the New Testament.'' (Oxford, 1963</ref>, disagree. While there are recorded executions by the Jewish authorities that of
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:06, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matthew 27:3, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Judas (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Matthew 27:8 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Blood money
- Matthew 27:9-10 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Zechariah
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of David Denby for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Denby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Denby until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 22:35, 23 November 2013 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Last best west.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Last best west.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:02, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
Merge discussion for Toronto municipal election, 2010
An article that you have been involved in editing, Toronto city council election, 2010, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. I was that you created this article. I invite you to add your comments. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 11:14, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mortise lock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lock (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 08:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Your wikipedia article on Chinese Wikipedia
Hi. Just a heads up. Your article on zh.wikipedia.org is dated, you may want to update it. -- Ktsquare (talk) 19:45, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
Some stroopwafels for you!
You have been an active Wikipedian for many years, but I've noticed you haven't edit much since. I wanted to let you know that your past contributions are appreciated, and we would love to see you back. Cheers, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 15:15, 12 February 2014 (UTC) |
Broadcast XML Nominated for deletion - please help
Broadcast Markup Language has been nominated for deletion by a user who is involved in trying to delete the BeerXML article and is now trawling Wikipedia for other articles to delete because they are losing that debate and feel that if other XML derived standards are deleted it might help them win the argument they are losing. Please challenge its deletion if you feel this is an unnacceptable. Regards Devils In Skirts! (talk) 12:47, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Notable computer viruses and worms listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Notable computer viruses and worms. Since you had some involvement with the Notable computer viruses and worms redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Compfreak7 (talk) 12:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Esquire Jauchem's résumé
Back in September you removed a vast swath of baloney from Esquire Jauchem's article per WP:COPYVIO. Esquire himself just reinserted it. I'd like to delete it but I can't find the website from which this is presumably copy-pasted. Any help? Blackguard 02:13, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Embassy of Algeria, Ottawa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Embassy of Algeria, Ottawa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Embassy of Algeria, Ottawa until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stalwart111 22:59, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Better source request for File:Last best west.jpg
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:
You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:07, 22 April 2014 (UTC)