User talk:Silverandblack

May 2010

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, Silverandblack, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because Pov fancruft type edit of JaMarcus Russell. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. --moreno oso (talk) 03:30, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the trivia about JaMarcus Russell being the biggest bust of all time. Any perceived bias on my part has not interfered with facts. Stating that Russell finished 21-4 with the LSU Tigers is a fact. Simply stating that Russell has not succeeded in the NFL and has been harshly criticized is all that would count as fact. That is not bias.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:40, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on JaMarcus Russell. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:00, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.RF23 (talk) 02:18, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

3RR4 warning

You have violated the three-revert rule on JaMarcus Russell‎. Any administrator may now choose to block your account. In the future, please make an effort to discuss your changes further, instead of edit warring. ----moreno oso (talk) 02:38, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. RF23 (talk) 02:42, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at JaMarcus Russell. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. - Vianello (Talk) 03:04, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may resume editing when the block expires, from your main account. Mysterious new accounts that appear out of the mist immediately after you're blocked and beeline immediately to raise the exact same point you did are not going to hasten your getting "back in the game". - Vianello (Talk) 03:49, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts to feign consensus. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. jpgordon^{::==( o )} 14:21, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]