User talk:Ringerfan23

This is Ringerfan23's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5

Please do not introduce reference errors

As you did at Hackney Diamonds. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:23, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Elisabeth

I have again removed your edit as it doesn’t even state his name in the screenshot coming from any of his social medias. Please read WP:UGC — Reddit is an online forum, it's not a source. Pillowdelight (talk) 08:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rotten Tomatoes page is dead

I think I understand your edit now[1]

Yes the Rotten Tomatoes page is dead. The dead page has been marked as dead, and the archive-url has been added to the reference and url-status=dead update accordingly, effectively replacing the dead page with the archived version. Marking it with {{dead link}} tag is redundant at this point. -- 109.79.171.34 (talk) 19:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite_web#URL in some cases editors will change the url-status= to unfit or usurped if a site is serving up something actively bad, but for a simple 404 it is usually left as is (even though the original page is no longer helpful). I suppose you could do that if you find the dead link really objectionable but there is no reason to have a {{dead link}} tag after a reference that has been marked url-status=dead already and an archive copy provided. -- 109.79.171.34 (talk) 19:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

this is what happens when I click the archive link on mobile. I haven’t tried it on my PC but I wanted to mark that the archive URL was seemingly not working. RF23 (talk) 21:48, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that is weird. I've seen problems where automatically added archive pointed to a useless page but this seems to be something different, but as I said the archive URL works for me and I am on Desktop.

Is this link any better? https://web.archive.org/web/20070508050341/http://www.rottentomatoes.com/features/special/2007/comic/?r=76&mid=1139025 or still the same problem? -- 109.79.171.34 (talk) 21:53, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah that link works, thanks. I’ve seen weird stuff with links on mobile (like a mobile redirecting to a 404 but the article showing up on desktop) but never with an archive.org link before. RF23 (talk) 22:16, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Gorillamonsoon.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Gorillamonsoon.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 2A0A:EF40:C03:8601:6511:3D13:F87E:8F18 (talk) 16:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]