User talk:SilentOne278

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Kookface (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:16, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NinjaRobotPirate

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SilentOne278 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sock Puppet?? Dude, I don't even know who Kookface is. I did create a duplicate account with JaceTheGreatOne because the topic at hand was ridiculous. I have multiple friends who've played Arena football and are no longer active yet they all have Wikipedia pages. Unblock me

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:06, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User:Dlohcierekim

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SilentOne278 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the reason for blocking (abusing multiple accounts), and I apologize for causing damage to disrupt Wikipedia. Please unblock me so I can continue contributing to the site. I will not create duplicate accounts in the future

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 05:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Uh, no

This is the additional account. As such it is unlikely to be unblocked.-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 01:18, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you just delete me then?

User:Dlohcierekim if I'm the "additional account" as you say I am. There's no purpose for me to be on here anymore.

Indeed. -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:47, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]