User talk:Sigh0402

Welcome!

Hello, Sigh0402, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Covalense, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Mr X 15:32, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help me

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How do i edit pages, sandbox pages headline exp those, which uses a company name but the article is blank.

Hi, Sigh0402! To edit pages is fairly easy. Just read and follow the instructions and links in Wikipedia's editing policy and you won't go wrong. Any other questions? Feel free to ask here (I'm watching for awhile) or on my talk page. Joys! – Paine Ellsworth ^CLIMAX! 17:52, 22 November 2013 (UTHo

How does one go about requesting a deletion of other user pages and sandbox which is visible on search engine. However, the page is named on a company and there is no content inside.

I'll reply here: other users' user pages and sandboxes are generally not deleted or edited without consent of the user. However to delete your own user page and sandbox, you can use the template here: Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#User pages. Extremepro (talk) 12:54, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. But, what can we do if a particular user is blocked and his/her userpage, sandbox page carries brand name and is visible on search engines? How does one go about deleting or editing the same?

Then it needs admin intervention. See Template:Admin help. Extremepro (talk) 02:49, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question for administrator

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{admin help-helped}} on this page with {{admin help}}, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

Greetings! What's the name of the page? —C.Fred (talk) 04:54, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is Covalense https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Covalense and User:Covalense/sandbox https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Covalense/sandbox Thank you for your response! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.51.251.74 (talk) 06:46, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - both deleted. JohnCD (talk) 08:38, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Covalense

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Covalense requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. - Mr X 15:32, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Covalense

Hello Sigh0402,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Covalense for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Extremepro (talk) 07:42, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:56, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Covalense (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Yunshui 雲‍水 15:53, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|What is sock puppet? Can you please clarify. I have not evaded any wiki rules and find my account blocked. Sigh0402 (talk) 16:11, 25 November 2013 (UTC)}}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sigh0402 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have nothing to do with user Covalense. And, secondly if I as a user trying to make an article, which has been deleted before is not evasion? My content was different and secondly I did not go further as I did not have the right material for the article. In what way, I have evaded user Covalense's block?? Can you please clarify. Sigh0402 (talk) 16:25, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Nothing to do with" Covalense? Really? Then why, at 0733 GMT, did you create the now-deleted Covalense? And a minute later, User:Covalense/sandbox? You might want to rethink your approach to being unblocked. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 16:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sigh0402 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was trying to create an article on the same topic and it does not mean that I am trying to evade other user's block. And, secondly, I put no index template on User:Covalense/sandbox as I wanted such blank pages to be erased. I did not create neither added anything to this page. Please check and then tell me

Decline reason:

By coincidence, you used some of the same wording as this other user that isn't you in an article about a company that you will undoubtedly tell us you are not connected to. Why did you want that sandbox deleted if you are not the same user or at the least working for the same company? Peridon (talk) 11:38, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sigh0402 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That is because the company intro is similar to what was written earlier and before any admin deleted it, I had erased all the content as I realized I did not have enough knowledge and material to support the topic. And, Secondly, I was just viewing a list of recent page deletions and it was one of the top. I was in process of highlighting such pages which are still visible on search engines and seek help. You are blocking an innocent user and Wiki fan!

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but your explanation of your actions is simply unbelievable. You've immediately continued the same additions of the spammy material for some minor firm. As above, you may want to consider an integrity-based approach to your next request. Kuru (talk) 13:20, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please put your reason inside the unblock template. Type a | after unblock, and then put your reason. I've moved it again for you. Peridon (talk) 13:00, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm interested in this list of recently deleted pages you were looking at. Could you tell me where to find it? Peridon (talk) 14:20, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

{unblock|Here it is https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Log/delete And, i am no longer interested in requesting. One can always make another account.

I was requesting as your target was wrong. Also. most of such deleted pages, you can find on search engines as well, which doesn't serve any purpose.