User talk:Shwepp

July 2010

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Talk:Michael Joseph (photographer). Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Without the edit summary, I'm not sure if you intentionally blanked the talk page, or if it was an accident. For now, I'm assuming that it was an accident. If I can help in any way, please drop a note on my talk page. Cheers! -- Bgpaulus (talk) 18:00, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the extra post, but it just occurred to me that you may have blanked the talk page in good faith, thinking that you were cleaning up old conversations. If that's the case, you should be aware that, as a general rule, we don't do that; for an explanation of what I'm talking about, please take a moment to read the talk page guidelines, in particular this section. Again, let me know if I can help. Cheers! -- Bgpaulus (talk) 18:07, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shwepp. You have new messages at Bgpaulus's talk page.
Message added 19:18, 23 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Michael Joseph (photographer), you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 18:10, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Matt ivnet for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Yworo (talk) 18:53, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Shwepp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

70.188.133.187 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Abusing [[WP:Sock puppetry|multiple accounts]]: Please see: [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Matt ivnet]]

Blocking administrator: Tnxman307 (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

I do not know that person. I am in CT. ???