User talk:Shui Yuena

Cheloniology moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Cheloniology, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. New articles generally need at least two (but preferably more) references from reliable sources that are independent of the subject that discuss the subject with significant coverage (trivial mentions do not contribute to notability).^{(See Rule 42)} Information that can't be referenced to reliable sources should be removed from the draft because verifiability is necessary for information added to Wikipedia.
I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of Draft: before the article title) where you can work on the article with minimal disruption from other users while you improve it.
When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready to be published, you can move it back to the article space yourself. However, I recommend that instead of moving it yourself that you follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template that I have added to the page. This submits the article to be reviewed by experienced editors that specialize in helping new editors write their first articles. Edaham (talk) 02:06, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

above notice

Hi I've noticed while reviewing the Cheloniology article that despite the fact that the article is old, and was previously a redirect, you have revived it. This means that I might have moved it to draft space while you were editing it as it doesn't yet contain any sources. Don't worry, as soon as the article is properly sourced with citations, it can be moved back to the main space by following the instructions on the template I placed at the top of the article. Sorry for any inconvenience caused and thanks so much for your contributions. Regarding the notable people section I removed that as uncited for the moment, there should be a citation for each of those people. Edaham (talk) 02:11, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as the article is currently quite short, can you possibly suggest things within it that I can cite? At the moment, without the "notable people" section, the article only consists of a description. What can I cite within it? Or was your meaning that I should add more content to the page so that I can cite other things? 谢谢你帮助我，我很感激。Shui Yuena (talk) 02:25, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. In answer to your question, yes, I'd like to help. I think this is an article which deserves attention. I've put some sources here Draft talk:Cheloniology. Why don't you take a look through them. Edaham (talk) 02:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

one point I'd like to make is that we aren't a dictionary. So our article should go beyond just defining the word. In this case that's an easy thing to do. We can talk about What kind of things a testudinologist does, why they do it and what kind of tools they use to overcome their many challenges as well as some of the frontiers they are trying to push into. We could break these down into categories or sub-headings like this:
- Specialist study
  - What do they do?
  - How to they identify and categorize species?
- Conservation
  - What reports do they make about numbers and so on?
  - What findings have they made regarding threats/solutions?
- Challenges
  - What difficulties do they face? (as I know very little is known about what they do and where they go after they come to beaches to lay eggs)

Hope this give you some ideas! I'll try to pop back from time to time and see if I can add anything, although I'm not even remotely educated in this field. The categories and cross-referenced wikiprojects on the talk page will help to attract more knowledgeable editors. Edaham (talk) 02:47, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I will definitely be utilizing your advice. Shui Yuena (talk) 02:51, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have another question if that's alright. I have added to the draft page. One section that I added was the "Research organizations" section. Should I create external links to each organization's website? I was reading something at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking that said that only necessary external links should exist. I don't know what to do. Should I add links or not? Thanks! Shui Yuena (talk) 17:23, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

From my perspective, I think the content would be better discussed at Herpetology, which gives better context. I doubt Cheloniology will expand beyond a mere dictionary definition in the near future. Batrachology is a rather poor article that should be merged to Herpetology. Ophiology is an even worse article that should be merged to Herpetology. We don't need a separate article for every word in the dictionary, and the sub-disciplines of herpetology are not rigidly constrained. Per the adivce above, virtually the same information applies to students of salamanders, snakes, and saurians. I think all "-ologies" of reptiles and amphibians should be combined and discussed until the point when quality, non-redundant text exceeds the capacity for a single article, per WP:SIZESPLIT. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a dictionary, and there are way too many permanent stubs. --Animalparty! (talk) 02:52, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that perspective. I agree with you and think it's a good idea to keep it in draft space until it expands to become a high mid-level article with solid references. I think WP:DUE is a significant policy to consider here. If there's a massive amount of studies being done on snakes, then the Ophiology article should definitely fork away from Herpetology article. If it's just being used as a place holder containing a dictionary definition then you can place the merge suggestion tag on it, if it hasn't been done already. Edaham (talk) 03:14, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Shui Yuena, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 02:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cheloniology (January 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Joe Decker was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sourcing issue is the most obvious, and is non-negotiable.

A more difficult second problem is making this entry be something more than more or less a dictionary definition, our WP:NOTDICT policy explains why that's a limit. The sources, sources which discuss Cheloniology in depth. The relevant policy requiring that is WP:GNG.

All this policy stuff can be mind-numbing, I know. If you're having trouble making sense of what's being asked for, please ask for assistance at the Teahouse. There should be a link on your talk page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cheloniology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cheloniology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

joe decker ^talk 03:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Shui Yuena, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! joe decker ^talk 03:20, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cheloniology has been accepted

Cheloniology, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

» Shadowowl | talk 12:31, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of reptiles of Israel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sandfish (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Shui Yuena. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at W. E. B. Du Bois‎ - Jews are not a race, please stop suggesting that

I have no idea what point you are trying to make by doing this. Please stop. Or at least try to get consensus on the talk page. Doug Weller talk 16:58, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cheloniology for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cheloniology is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheloniology until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Regards, Sun Creator^(talk) 14:20, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]