User talk:Shringhringshring

This is Shringhringshring's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, Shringhringshring, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Geniac (talk) 04:02, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vivek Verma (January 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Vivek Verma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Vivek Verma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:53, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shringhringshring! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 21:53, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parmish Verma (January 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:NCREATIVE.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Parmish Verma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Parmish Verma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 11:59, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mishika chourasia

I've moved the new article you created at Mishika chourasia to Draft:Mishika Chourasia. She does not meet WP:NACTOR, even remotely, plus you got the capitalization wrong. Please stop creating articles on non-notable subjects - more than a few of your recent articles have ended up deleted or as redirects because they don't meet Wikipedia's standards for notability. You may believe they do, but given the track record at AFD, it's pretty evident your belief is different from Wikipedia's standards. You'd be better off starting all new articles in draft space and working on getting them approved as that dramatically improves the odds of passing an AFD. Ravensfire (talk) 00:08, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

On top of that, when you created that article, you saw a notice that there had already been an article there AND that it was discussed at WP:Articles for deletion/Mishika Chourasia where it was deleted. You cannot just recreate just deleted articles - they will end up being deleted very quickly as that's a easy speedy deletion. Actually, that's why you has the caps wrong, wasn't it? That page had been recreated enough times after the deletion so it was protected, and you decided that going around it was a good idea and wouldn't be noticed. Don't do that again, okay? It's not smart and will end up with you blocked. Very disappointed. Ravensfire (talk) 00:36, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sherlyn Chopra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Lass

Hi Shringhringshring and thanks for the assistance. However, I think you clicked the wrong button for the Speedy. No way does A1 apply in this case. I think WP:AFD would work better here. The sources are rubbish, most of them either dead or to his own website. I think it might fail GNG. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 08:05, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Martin Lass

Hello Shringhringshring. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Martin Lass, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a WP:A1 candiate - long enough and with enough detail to clearly identify what it is about. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 09:31, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shringhringshring - thank you - I was just about to suggest the WP:AFD process might be more appropriate. Please let me know if I can assist you with this, or with anything else Wikipedia-related. Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:45, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Transclusion error

Hi Shringhringshring

I just corrected an issue where rather than linking to a policy in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Lass you transcluded it. Just in case you need a reminder, to link policies (or, indeed, anything) you need to type [[WP:GNG]], while to transclude them you do {{WP:GNG}}.

Thank you for listing the article, however! -- NoCOBOL (talk) 09:50, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Parmish Verma (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Praxidicae were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Parmish Verma and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Parmish Verma, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 12:15, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vivek Verma (April 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by HitroMilanese was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Does not appear to meet WP:NSINGER or WP:GNG. Has been deleted a year ago. Can't seem to find any notable difference.

Hitro talk 10:33, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Viral Desai moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Viral Desai, does not have Reliable sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 21:48, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Meet Luthra

Hello Shringhringshring,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Meet Luthra for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 06:19, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Meet Luthra

Hello Shringhringshring,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Meet Luthra for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:49, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Meet Luthra, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 08:49, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your speedy deletion of Gladys Goodall

Suggest you allow articles to exist in mainspace for more than 3 minutes before nominating them for speedy deletion. The article was under construction and the subject clearly meets GNG - the second sentence of the stub demonstrated this. MurielMary (talk) 00:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Until you are more familiar with Wikipedia processes, I suggest you don't tag articles for speedy deletion. Schwede 66 03:39, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Coach Meddy

Hello Shringhringshring, when MER-C moved Coach Meddy to draft, it was because all paid contributions must go through an independent review, per WP:PE. You are not listed as a participant at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Participants. I don't think your assessment that "The subject seems to have multiple articles on reliable sources . So moving it to article space." [1] is correct. Did you really think that the advertorial by "External Writer" in newsblaze is an independent, reliable source? Have you not wondered why a Nepali media outlet, the Kathmandu Tribune, would publish an article about a fitness trainer in Dubai? I'm fairly confident that all these sources are advertisements disguised as editorial content, and do not meet the requirements of our notability guidelines. The article should be returned to to AfC, and rewritten with better sources. If it remains as is, I will nominate it for deletion. If you were paid to move the article, please remember that you are required to disclose that. Vexations (talk) 12:28, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kshitij Tarey for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kshitij Tarey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kshitij Tarey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Siddharth 📨 15:43, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello, I'm Stwalkerster. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you unlinked one or more redlinks. Often redlinks can be helpful, so we don't remove them just because they are red. They help improve Wikipedia by attracting editors to create needed articles.

In addition, clicking on the "What links here" special link (in the Wikipedia Toolbox at left) on a missing article shows how many—and which—articles depend on that article being created. This can help prioritize article creation. Redlinks are useful! Please, only remove a redlink if you are pretty sure that it is to a non-notable topic and not likely ever to be created. Thanks! stwalkerster (talk) 08:09, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello thanks, I am removing the redlinks of the wikipedia pages which got deleted and is not notable, thanks for your guidelines, i will keep that i mind though 😇😇 Shringhringshring (talk) 08:17, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Shringhringshring! You created a thread called Nees Help in Fixing the This Article i Recently Made. at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Shringhringshring (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Respected Admins, i am really surprised and heartbroken to see myself getting blocked from editing and that too just because i put my effort to spread my workspace on Wikipedia so that i can add maximum numbers of contributions which would lead to a boost up in my knowledge of knowing Wikipedia more, i barely find myself in any kind of promotional activity infact i had started participating in Afd's as well , and my target was to cross 500+ edits in this week that was the reason i was editing every now and then like removing unnecessary redlinks, making articles which have reliable recourse and not only that i wanted to get myself some appreciation from my fellow seniors over here, but i am stunned that what really offensive i did that they blocked me!? And that to after tagging under advertising, i have spent months reading Wikipedia policies and WP tags on each small small topics so that i could understand Wikipedia more, but whyy!?? Why i got blocked without any offense i did! I know everything over here is just to make Wikipedia a good place, i will respect the decisions of seniors too, apart from that i don't have any options also, but this will lead to loss of a passionate wiki editing who always seeked learning more :(( thank you!! Shringhringshring^📞 21:02, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

comment i just saw that i have been blocked because i edited some pages which unfortunately was also edited by some other editors as well named as Vixhere, please tell me, there are thousands of articles which are edited by numerous editors will u gugs block anyone without even knowing just on the base of coincidence, i really feel sorry for people like me here on Wikipedia who put their time and effort to be something over here and tty hard to learn the process and meanwhile get rewards like this just because they tried to work more n more, admins i request u to please re check properly, i have been editing this place from months almost a year, i have no connections at all with the given names vixhere n one other, please 😫🙏🙏💓 don't put me in the flames of others deeds, i really don't have any idea on what they were doing, i know this that i sincerely was doing my duty to become a good editor, please recheck i at least don't deserve this!! 🙏🙏🙏

Shringhringshring^📞 20:27, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Frankly, I simply do not believe you randomly stumbled and decided to help with articles about both an Indian entrepreneur and a French MMA coach without some link to the other editors who have been doing paid editing and abusing multiple accounts who also just happened to have created those pages. Sometimes, the coincidence is just too much. You are going to have to be much more honest in your unblock review. Sasquatch t|c 18:45, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that his block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Shringhringshring (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #25589 was submitted on Jun 14, 2019 05:48:19. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 05:48, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Toranj Kayvon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toranj Kayvon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toranj Kayvon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravensfire (talk) 04:18, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Viral Desai concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Viral Desai, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 23:00, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Viral Desai

Hello, Shringhringshring. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Viral Desai".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 13:32, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mishika Chourasia

Hello, Shringhringshring. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mishika Chourasia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 12:39, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Anjana Reddy concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Anjana Reddy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Anjana Reddy concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Anjana Reddy, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anjana Reddy

Hello, Shringhringshring. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anjana Reddy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 21:23, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kary Oberbrunner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kary Oberbrunner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kary Oberbrunner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 16:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anjana Reddy

Hello, Shringhringshring. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anjana Reddy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 17:34, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]