User talk:Shredded77

Civilian Casualties

Hi, regarding the civilian casualties article you have added some statements without references that differ from what is said in Just War theory and Moral absolutism. In the case of Just War theory, the article is heavily biased towards the Christian tradition anyway, so your comments are probably part of the answer. In the case of Moral Absolutism, I have not seen Human agency used to imply Human rights before. Could you have a look a these articles, so we can find a way forward in ensuring they are compatible with each other? Addhoc 12:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

May 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. An article you recently created, Diddy Riese, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Haemo 07:03, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Diddyriese.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Diddyriese.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:06, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2007

Hey!! Good job on the Diddy Riese article. I was going to do one today, but you already did it! Awesomeness!!
Crazilazigurl07 talk 23:55, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Tp logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Tp logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:32, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Shredded77! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 687 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Brian O'Shaughnessy (philosopher) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/LA Font. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! CharlieEchoTango (talk) 14:16, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of UCLAradio.com

The article UCLAradio.com has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable internet radio station

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Regards, James(^talk/_contribs) 17:14, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your bold edits at Astroworld (album)

Please direct your efforts at discussing your changes at the article's talk page rather than reinstating them (WP:BRD). Thank you. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 23:20, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 18:00, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shredded. Please take this to the talk page and seek consensus. When an edit is reverted the talk page should normally be the next stop. And worse, from the editing history it looks like you are edit warring which is a no no. Thanks for your cooperation. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:50, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Concerns have been raised that you may be editing while logged out. Don't do that. Even under the most favorable circumstances (we all do make honest mistakes) it looks bad. In cases like content disputes or other controversies it can be seen as a specie of sock-puppetry and people have been blocked for it. Seriously, be careful to only edit while logged in. If you do accidentally edit while logged out I encourage logging in and then reverting the edit and re-posting it with a short explanatory note in the edit summary. Thanks for your contributions to the project. -Ad Orientem (talk) 02:13, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rogét Chahayed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joji (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Uclaradio.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Uclaradio.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]