User talk:Sheshank optim

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sheshank optim, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to National Academy of Agricultural Research Management does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Muhandes (talk) 16:45, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sheshank optim, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Sheshank optim! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Sheshank optim. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 16:45, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding update of information[edit]

I am student of ICAR NATIONAL ACADEMY OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH MANAGEMENT their is a lot of information missing about my academy and it is not helping the students who are looking and seeking information about the academy.

Many students look up for Wikipedia to get information regarding the academy, and infrastructure and the benefits of seeking better education for better future .

I hope u accept by edits and help fellow students get access to information to improve there lives . Many people are still looking out for opportunities, Wikipedia is best platform to guide all of them . Sheshank optim (talk) 17:03, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sheshank optim, you are welcome to improve our page on the National Academy of Agricultural Research Management. What you may not do here is copy material from other websites and insert it into this project. Your edits have been undone for that reason. I've left a long message below to explain this to you; if there's anything in it that isn't clear to you, do please ask – here on this page would be fine. Welcome to Wikipedia! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:45, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please also carefully read the messages I left you above. As a student of the institute you may have a conflict of interest and you might have added material which may be considered promotional or otherwise lacking in neutrality, consciously or unconsciously. You may also want to have a look at the college and university article advice. --Muhandes (talk) 18:04, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Sheshank optim, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to National Academy of Agricultural Research Management have been removed, as they appear to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:42, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]