User talk:Shenalyn2018

This is Shenalyn2018's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaron Sim (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ernestchuajiasheng was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aaron Sim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aaron Sim, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RedFlame (talk) 10:55, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Shenalyn2018, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! RedFlame (talk) 10:55, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
5	C.C. Chapman (talk)	Add sources
37	James Swearingen (talk)	Add sources
40	English-language vowel changes before historic /l/ (talk)	Add sources
53	Standard written English (talk)	Add sources
7	Continental Volleyball Conference (talk)	Add sources
6	Schantz Organ Co. (talk)	Add sources
25	Protection of Broadcasts and Broadcasting Organizations Treaty (talk)	Cleanup
12	Shawnee Mission Parkway (talk)	Cleanup
23	Transportation on Long Island (talk)	Cleanup
141	Phonological history of English low back vowels (talk)	Expand
15	Sarah Austin (Internet celebrity) (talk)	Expand
392	Viral marketing (talk)	Expand
33	X-inefficiency (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
26	Perry Marshall (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
471	Social entrepreneurship (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
34	Spokane Empire (talk)	Merge
56	Lifestreaming (talk)	Merge
304	UKUSA Agreement (talk)	Merge
4	Rainer Pottel (talk)	Wikify
16	Political podcast (talk)	Wikify
58	Uses of podcasting (talk)	Wikify
5	Rob Walling (talk)	Orphan
7	Himno a León (talk)	Orphan
16	Charlie Harary (talk)	Orphan
4	Bernhausen (talk)	Stub
4	Golf Coaches Association of America (talk)	Stub
6	Liam Mooney (talk)	Stub
13	Epic Signal (talk)	Stub
5	Jayson Gaignard (talk)	Stub
11	Xconomy (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:59, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaron Sim (January 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not remotely clear how he passes the notability guidelines

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aaron Sim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aaron Sim, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:22, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aaron Sim has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aaron Sim. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aaron Sim (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No newly added reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject, and so does not satisfy WP:GNG.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aaron Sim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aaron Sim, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 04:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aaron Sim for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aaron Sim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Sim until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:17, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jim Kwik

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jim Kwik, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:10, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

10,000

Hello. Couldn't help but notice the user box that says you've made > 10,000 edits. I count about 54. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:39, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello, Shenalyn2018. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but Jim Kwik has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD#G11. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.

Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Users who do so may be blocked from editing. Promotional content is vigorously deleted. Wikipedia:Identifying_blatant_advertising#Typical_signs_of_blatant_advertising contains information about content to avoid. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click User:Dlohcierekim/promo.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources . Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

YOU CAN ASK FOR HELP AT THE TEAHOUSE

Any deficiencies should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions. Wikipedia is not a webhost. You may wish to consider alternative outlets.

If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard or articles for creation to guide you through the creation process.

You may find this tool useful: Google custom search Don't feel discouraged. My first attempts at creating articles were deleted too.

You can help us make Wikipedia better

Wikipedia has many articles in need of improvement. Perhaps you can help.

Some articles need copy editing.

Category:All articles needing copy edit

Wikipedia articles need verifiable information from WP:reliable sources

Category:Articles lacking sources

Reliable sources should have inline citations to identify where information came from

Category:Articles lacking in-text citations

We would appreciate help in improving these articles.

There is more information at Wikipedia:Community_portal Cheers, and happy editing. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:43, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources in Draft:Katarina Rodriguez

Hi . I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for information in a biography article, Draft:Katarina Rodriguez . Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). Similarly, IMDB should not be used for biographical information per WP:CITEIMDB. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 16:30, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fuman Wang (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fuman Wang and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Fuman Wang, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and save.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 11:36, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi mate, Could you please help me and vote

keep based on GNG as the player is an icon of Ethiopian football and also very suited for a note via GNG.

Please vote on this. I can help to clean up your article... Avaay (talk) 10:52, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Avaay Just saw your message someone already deleted it, I'm also wondering about this GNG. Especially if the one that covers the news is from a national newspaper but offline like in SouthEast Asia, where newspapers are still a trend. Shenalyn2018 (talk) 15:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)Shenalyn2018[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fuman Wang

Hello, Shenalyn2018. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fuman Wang".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor 12:08, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]