User talk:Sharief123

Sharief123, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sharief123! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 11 November 2018 (UTC)

November 2018

Hello, I'm Shellwood. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Zameer Naqvi— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Shellwood (talk) 11:40, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline

Hello, Sharief123. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 03:44, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of Ayatollahs

Hi there, we really appreciate that you have coperated with us, you have also made some edits in the article List of Ayatollahs.You have added name of Grand Ayatollah imam Khomeini, Sayed Ali Khamenei and grand ayatollah Ali Sistani.We appreciate it but list should only contain names of Ayatollahs.These three people are Grand Ayatollahs (Marja) or (Marja e Taqeleed).They are not Ayatollahs they are Grand Ayatollah.If you don't know the difference between Ayatollah and Grand Ayatollah, then kindly read the following pages:

Grand Ayatollah is higher clerical rank than Ayatollah.List of Ayatollahs mean only names of Ayatollahs not the Grand Ayatollah.List of Grand Ayatollahs is this List of current Maraji.This list contain the names of all alive Marja.So kindly please be careful next time in editing.If you have something to say you can write it on my talk page.Thanks Tubi719 (talk) 19:00, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Osama bin Laden, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:58, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Syed Jawad Naqvi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Principal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Jawad Naqvi is not an Ayatollah

Hi there, I saw your message on my talk page, You said Jawad Naqvi is an ayatollah without providing any reference.I have provided reference on his article Syed Jawad Naqvi (reference no.1 and 2) where he his addresed as Hujat tul Islam. Similarly you should also provide a reference for this that he is an ayatollah.You cannot come and just edit page like this without any reference.You even don't no what is difference between Ayatollah and Grand Ayatollah and what is "Ijtihad".So kindly stop editing the page like this or this time you will be blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia's policies. I had also said it before that official website of Syed Jawad Naqvi (islamimarkaz.com) also state him as "Allamah" or Maulana.The official YouTube channel of Syed Jawad Naqvi (Islamimarakz) also state him as Hujattul Islam.You can see it here [1] His official channel is stating him as Hujat tul Islam, then who are u to say that he is an Ayatollah.If you have something to say, you can write it on my talk page, Thanks Tubi719 (talk) 15:32, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Jawad Naqvi

Hi there, Yes kindly please send links, but if the links and sites will not be appropriate or authentic they will not be accepted.As i have said that Syed Jawad Naqvis official (own) channel on YouTube state him as Hujatul Islam. This is the link of his YouTube Channel: Jawad Naqvi's channel on Youtube So kindly send the links which contain ijazah of his ijtihad from his teacher (Marja).Then Wikipedia will accept it.If you editted the page now without any reference you will be blocked and a tag will be added to your page for blocking you from editing.Thanks Tubi719 (talk) 11:16, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

this is link Sharief123 (talk) 11:25, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

the link where not sended...Please give me whats app number... Sharief123 (talk) 11:26, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Hi there, No need for Whats App Number, add the links to page Syed Jawad Naqvi or my talk page.Thanks Tubi719 (talk) 11:34, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Hi there, You said the page shows error it is impossible, but as you say add your links to page Syed Jawad Naqvi by editting page, then we will see the links. Tubi719 (talk) 12:10, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Links

Hi there, Thanks for sending links, But according to Wikipedia's policies Wikipedia do not accept any references from "Facebok", "YouTube" or "Istagram".These are not reliable sources because anyone can post whatever they want. Wikipedia only accept reliable resources i.e the official website of the person or other sources. Even if we accept the link that you have sended, the Facebook page is not his "Official Page" it's a "Fan Made" page. He can write whatever he want, so it's not reabile. I also told you before not to send unauthentic references and that they will not be accepted. Provide a proper authentic site reference or Copy (image) of syed Jawad Naqvi's ijazah from his Marja'. Then it will be accepted. You can read more about Wikipedia's ploicies on this article: Wikipedia:External links/Perennial websites Thanks, Tubi719 (talk) 07:18, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Syed Jawad Naqvi

Hi there, Thanks for your reply, the links you have sended are not of his "Official page". If you open the profile of that person it says: "Fan Made page of Syed Jawad". I am travelling to Pakistan in some days, I will ask him directly about this issue. It isn't that Wikipedia doesn't accept "Youtube" or "Facebook" refrences, it only accepts the accounts or channels that are the official page of that user on Facebook or Youtube. On the other hand you said a Alim cannot lie on "Mimber", this no proof anyone can lie we cannot belive it until Syed Jawad Naqvi say it by himself. The problem is that if he is an "Ayatollah" then why do his Official Account of Facebook, Youtube or his site states him as Hujat tul Islam. I have no problem stating him as Ayatollah but there is no authentic proof of it. Hope you do understand, Thanks. Tubi719 (talk) 16:25, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Howza ilmeya jamia jaffria moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Howza ilmeya jamia jaffria, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 16:33, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Howza ilmeya jamia jaffria (January 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need reliable sources to indicate this school is notable. Website does not seem to go anywhere.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Howza ilmeya jamia jaffria and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Howza ilmeya jamia jaffria, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 17:55, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan

Hi there, Yes i will travel to Pakistan in Feburaray or early March and i will make sure to ask him this question. Thanks Tubi719 (talk) 13:43, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Howza ilmeya jamia jaffria for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Howza ilmeya jamia jaffria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howza ilmeya jamia jaffria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram (talk) 09:13, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Maqbool Bhat. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. DBig Xrayᗙ 11:36, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also at Afzal Guru --DBig Xrayᗙ 12:02, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Masood Azhar. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 13:57, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Howza ilmeya jamia jaffria

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Howza ilmeya jamia jaffria, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Legacypac (talk) 11:56, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Muhammad al-Tijani, you may be blocked from editing. AhmadLX (talk) 19:13, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan

Hi there, I went to Pakistan and I have returned now, unfortunately I couldn't met Syed Jawad, I went to Jamia Urwatul Wusqa, but Syed wasn't there. I will try to meet him when I go there next time. If you live in Lahore than you can ask it yourself, Thanks. Tubi719 (talk) 17:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ohh... Okay don't worry... Inshallah anytime i will try...Thanks Sharief123 (talk) 10:42, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Shia Muslim scholars of Islam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Allama (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to censor or remove encyclopedic content based on the fact that it is offensive to some readers, as you did at Syed Jawad Naqvi, you may be blocked from editing. Wikipedia is not censored, and attempts to censor encyclopedic content will be regarded as vandalism.Please stop removing referenced content from the page. Abide by MOS:ISLAM & MOS:BLP. Fz^tc_s 19:20, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Kalbe Jawad, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Fz^tc_s 19:01, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Syed Jawad Naqvi, you may be blocked from editing. I ask you again, please discuss on Talk:Syed Jawad Naqvi before doing another series of disruptive editing on the article. Fz^tc_s 05:15, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You removed Syed & Naqvi from page of Kalbe Jawad which are part of his name during this edit but you keep adding 'Allama' to Syed Jawad Naqvi which is a title and not allowed as per MOS:ISLAM, what sort of double standards do you follow? It is clear, your edits are based on your POV and are not neutral.--Fz^tc_s 05:32, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting help

Hi greetings,

I have been looking for update and expansion support for 2 following articles in draft namespace

Draft:Aurat (word) (article to cover grammar and linguistic part)

and

Draft:Aurat (article to cover cultural women)

Please do have a look at the article, do update, expand, correct inaccuracies, suggest and discuss better article titles

Looking forward to your kind support.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 09:15, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Syed Jawad Naqvi, you may be blocked from editing. First of all I haven't added the content, I just reverted your unexplained content removal which constitutes vandalism at worst or censorship at best. The content is properly sourced based on reference on leading Urdu daily of India, over all the content only mentions that "Indian daily and weekly Urdu newspapers Sahafat and Nauroz published articles critical to him." and "Indian daily and Urdu newspaper Sahafat and Hindi newspaper Bhumitra again criticised his May 29, 2020 Friday sermon", I don't see where comes original research or advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything. The edits done by you are disruptive and not mine, so, before removing them please put your case on Talk-page. Fz^tc_s 18:30, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Syed Jawad Naqvi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Representative, Principal, Eminent and Islamic schools

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Sharief123 reported by User:Faizhaider (Result: ). Thank you. Fz^tc_s 10:46, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Final Warning

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --14.142.206.26 (talk) 15:32, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sharief123. Can you explain why you left a fake block notice for this IP editor on their talk page? And why you are continuing to revert at Syed Jawad Naqvi after being told you've been reported at WP:AN3? It would be better to respond at AN3 and promise to wait for consensus before reverting again. The closing admin will soon have to decide if you should be blocked for long term edit warring on this article. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 13:35, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ed Johnston, I am just reverting those edits which was voilating Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, like adding original research- such as facts, allegations, ideas, negative information and personal experiences-for which no reliable published source exists; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of the explicitly say. And this ip editor and And the one who reported me was also adding some content which was voilating Wikipedia's neutral policy and reverting my edits. I was just doing my work. If you think I made a mistake, then you have the right to take action against me. As I know we should be neutral on this platform and should revert allegations and and nagative points as per neutral point of view policy.Thank you! Sharief1 23ᗙ ) 14:17, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If I am the admin who closes the report at WP:AN3, you can avoid a block for edit warring if you will promise to wait for a consensus on talk before making further edits at Syed Jawad Naqvi. EdJohnston (talk) 14:48, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ed Johnston, Yes of course I promise to wait for a consensus on talk before making further edits at article Syed Jawad Naqvi. But I want to say with full enthusiasm and Unctuousness that if i promise to discuss on talk page then other editors who are editing on artical should also discuss on talk page. I was reverting those which was not neutral and was voilating Wikipedia'sneutral point of view policy. I was editing as per rules. I am trying to balance the article because it should be neutral but this should be emphasized that there are many contents in article which are not neutral should be reverted. Thank you! Sharief123 (talk) 03:19, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Where, pray tell, do you see that consensus at the talk page? —C.Fred (talk) 16:57, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making changes to Syed Jawad Naqvi without reaching consensus. You have been earlier warned by Darkwind, C.Fred & EdJohnston.--14.142.206.26 (talk) 23:19, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Continued edit warring at Syed Jawad Naqvi

Syed Jawad Naqvi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Syed Jawad Naqvi. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Contrary to your agreement to wait for consensus that you made on 16 July you have been continuing to revert at Syed Jawad Naqvi. As you know, you were previously reported at WP:AN3 for edit warring on this same article. EdJohnston (talk) 14:56, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Mr Sharief123 we are still waiting for your inputs on the talk page. Interestingly, you have directly jumped on article and have reverted to your earlier behavior of disruptive editing. Please don't make changes to the article Syed Jawad Naqvi before consensus. You have been earlier warned by Darkwind, C.Fred & EdJohnston, and even blocked for not adhering to your agreement to wait for consensus and not heeding to the warnings. --14.142.206.26 (talk) 01:03, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In particular, please provide a reliable source that shows his first name is Syed. —C.Fred (talk) 01:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't understand why you are removing Syed which is part of the name. Allama which is title. First explain in article talk page then make any changes. Sharief123 (talk) 08:43, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Per what reliable source is Syed his given name? —C.Fred (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Aga Syed Mohsin Al Mosvi, you may be blocked from editing. Follow the guidelines at WP:AFD if you think that the article should be deleted. Idell (talk) 11:58, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kalbe Sadiq. — Jeff G. ツ 10:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But according to many newses and reports he died. Sharief123 (talk) 15:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[2] Sharief123 (talk) 15:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

About titles, honorifics and appeal to popularity

Hello and greetings,

This is just for your kind info. Since previously you have participated in an inconclusive RfC discussion at this RfC in year going by, and since some related aspects are under discussion at Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Titles, honorifics and appeal to popularity may be you want to join in to share your inputs or opinions.

Thanks and regards

Bookku (talk) 05:51, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Howza ilmeya jamia jaffria

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Howza ilmeya jamia jaffria requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Howza ilmeya jamia jaffria. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fram (talk) 07:54, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bethat Educational TV channel

The article Bethat Educational TV channel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks all notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamia Urwa-tul-Wusqa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jamia Urwa-tul-Wusqa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 09:52, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Explain why... It is university at Lahore Pakistan Sharief123 (talk) 12:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamia Urwa-tul-Wusqa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jamia Urwa-tul-Wusqa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamia Urwa-tul-Wusqa. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone 12:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Howza ilmeya jamia jaffria. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Spiderone 12:34, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Jamia Urwa-tul-Wusqa, you may be blocked from editing. Spiderone 13:58, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamia Urwa-tul-Wusqa

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jamia Urwa-tul-Wusqa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jamia Urwa-tul-Wusqa. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fram (talk) 13:16, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Admin noticeboard discussion

There is a discussion regarding your edits at WP:ANI#User:Sharief123. Your comments there are welcome. Fram (talk) 13:44, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bethat Educational TV channel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bethat Educational TV channel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bethat Educational TV channel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone 13:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding unsourced or poorly sourced information contrary to the biographies of living persons policy, editing seemingly to promote Jawad Naqvi contrary to the purposes of Wikipedia, and abusing multiple accounts.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 16:02, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]