User talk:Shanon11

Welcome!

Hello, Shanon11, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Giant Snowman 09:46, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

July 2017

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 11:30, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

??? Which article ?

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Robert Earnshaw, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:11, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification – AFC Third Round.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. — Jkudlick ⚓ t ⚓ c ⚓ s 15:02, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Shanon11. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Veselin Jelušić, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 16:14, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at User talk:GiantSnowman, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( in the enhanced toolbar, or if you use the old "classic" toolbar) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Chris Troutman (talk) 17:52, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have already been told that the source on Veselin Jelušić is not reliable and cannot be used. Please see WP:RS. Giant Snowman 16:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Your first message just say "no source". I try an answer to you but this one disappear (see above). I use a source but now you are considering that the source is "not reliable". OK. I agree that's special to use "the game Football Manager database", but with many personalities, it's correct ! And a lot propose a photography of the coach ou player. Shanon11 (talk) 19:13, 23 April 2018 (UTC) SORRY for my poor English, Friendly yours. Shanon11 (talk) 17:14, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Brightwell Banda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trainer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:39, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Paulo Henrique Filho. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 13:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, If I do a "change" or and "add", it is most often because I read the information on other language Wikipedia WITH sources. Another interventions could also coming from "big mistake". Example: page László Budai Hungarian football player. English version writes that in didn't play during World Cup 1958 in Sweden. It's false. It's well the same who played in 1954. All available sources, included Hungarian F.A., confirm that he plays two games in Sweden (3rd Group game and the Play-off against Wales). I do the change but someone revert it. If your prefer laying error... as you want. Sorry to disturb "YOUR" wiki game. For your information, I personnaly finish the complete archbivs of World Cup including qualifying games. A long six years work, and I'am member of official and serious Belgian association of Football Archivist "FOOT100". Friendly. Shanon11 Shanon11 15:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1978 FIFA World Cup Group 4, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1954 World Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shanon11. You have new messages at PKT's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Template:Football box

Please stop formatting these templates incorrectly, 1974 FIFA World Cup Final is fine as is. Flags should not be added to referees, {{goal}} should always be right aligned, and only the final score should be included. S.A. Julio (talk) 07:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Julio, thank you for your message. Thanks in advance to speak of my "templates" proposals with others contributors on Wiki English language football project (I don't find the link): (1) Flags: I add in order to give a little bit "colors" and so made pages more fun to read and clearly differentiated referees. (2) Score I take the initiative to adapt because we present old Games, and I feel interesting to propose "chronological" score evolution, for younger readers, with 'br/' codes between - In same philosophy, I add the "

" missing penalty for the game Poland-West Germany. It's a important fact in this particular context. (3) I accept to be critized but... I take few days to update/create empty 1974 pages (between 1970 and 1978 which was made), and you come with "short dry" critics when I finish. Without any words of other appreciation. "Sad isn't it ?" (4) I made lot of search to find missing infos (card minutes, and so on) - not a word of you about it. (5) I write game summaries for Group 1 and 2. and you don't say me if correction are (surely) needed, because my English is poor. I think we could be more constructive together that only stay behind simple "template choices/criteria". Yours friendly. Shanon11 (talk) 10:17, 22 May 2018 (CET)

Regarding flags, see WP:ICONDECORATION (icons should serve an encyclopedic purpose and not merely be decorative). Regarding scores, the same could be said for more recent matches, but the consensus is to not include this. Feel free to bring this up at WT:FOOTY. There is a lot of missing World Cup information, so of course your contributions are appreciated. But the poor template formatting (which goes against consensus) creates more work for other editors. I haven't had time to look over all the articles, but I'd gladly help copyedit/review where necessary. S.A. Julio (talk) 09:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I understand a "consensus" is needed and criteria choosen, it's logical. (same in French and probably all languages). Just hoping to do evoluate ;-). Thanks to have taking time to answer me. Shanon11 (talk) 12:02, 22 May 2018 (CET)

FIFA

You need to source what you write. Does not matter if you watched the matches or not. Kante4 (talk) 17:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for answer. Fully agree to put sources when needed (credibility is very important): like personalities statements, specific rules,... But for a single summary of a game, including small explanations of actions (pass from..., header of..., mistake of...,... and so on) ??? Without mistake of me, it's not allowed to insert link to videos as reference (in French edition it's forbidden). The same for "circumstances explanations": my English is poor and my grammar is bad", OK. But when I write, as example : "Despite having 0 point, Scotland could yet qualify between the four best third placed..." you don't need a source because it is just a logical analysis of the circumstances before the concerned kick-off. Friendly.Shanon11 (talk) 07:33PM, 26 May 2018 (CET) - Belgium.

(by talk reader) "you don't need a source because it is just a logical analysis of the circumstances" No. Please see WP:NOR. I understand you're a fan and want to write how you see the subject. This isn't allowed. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:24, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 1986 FIFA World Cup Group C. Chris Troutman (talk) 18:26, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Shanon11. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Piotr Świerczewski, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 23:57, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robby. The rule is the rule. I think it..."funny and also a little bit stupid" that we cannot re-send to another Wiki page (this time in Polish) to confirm or source a small contribution. In the case of football Polish language pages use the same concept of "Personal life paragraph". I do'nt consider that you make a mistake. Is it is the rule,... it is the rule. Haver a nive nnew year eve and a very happy and luck 2021. --Shanon11 (talk) 08:11, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shanon11. WP:CIRCULAR explains why the rule exists. I'm confident we should be able to find a proper source for the siblings. I'll have a look. :-) Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 10:43, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ante Jurić (footballer born in 1934

Hello, Shanon11

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Ante Jurić (footballer born in 1934, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 Talk 14:52, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, I'm Robby.is.on. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mayanga Maku, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Robby.is.on (talk) 07:38, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hugo Siquet

Hi. Your addition at Hugo Siquet came without a source. I have added one. As you've been asked to a few times before, please include WP:inline citations. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 11:42, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I don't have except French wiki and my personnal Knowledge. I worked 21 years foot national sport newspaper in Belgium. Friendly yours. Shanon11 (talk) 18:55, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you have worked for a newspaper I'm sure you'll have no trouble doing the necessary research to find sources. In the case of Siquet and his uncle, it was as easy as searching for "hugo siquet thierry" in a web search. Robby.is.on (talk) 20:10, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I willdo my best. Shanon11 (talk) 09:17, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good. Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 15:22, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]