User talk:Shankarsivarajan

Welcome!

Hello, Shankarsivarajan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 08:48, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jeraphine Gryphon. For the welcome message, but mainly for letting me know about Wikifauna! :-) I'm gonna be a WikiDragon! Shankarsivarajan (talk) 16:16, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:15, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Shankarsivarajan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

You ask about NPOV. Yes, I fucking wrote part of it. My fingerprints are in there. I've been here since 2003, and finally registered in 2005. You might benefit from reading one of my essays about NPOV: NPOV means neutral editors, not neutral content. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 17:48, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, so using biased sources is the right thing to do in this case? Whatever you say: you have seniority. Shankar Sivarajan (talk) 01:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is no requirement in NPOV to use unbiased sources. Besides, they're rare and boring as hell. We are supposed to document the "sum of all human knowledge" (Jimbo Wales). That includes biased opinions.

NPOV refers primarily to editorial bias, not to source bias. Editors must not allow their own bias to censor sources. That would be Wikipedia taking sides. No, we must document the bias in the source. We give more weight to the bias found in important and accurate RS. Minority views and bias get less weight. The fringe and inaccurate bias found in unreliable sources gets ignored, unless it is documented in RS, and then it gets some minor mention, because of its minor due weight. -- BullRangifer (talk) PingMe 05:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need to source obvious facts such as the people who were in the Americas before Columbus

That's why they are called Indigenous peoples of the Americas. I have no idea what you were thinking when you did that. Doug Weller talk 13:48, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The claim is not that there were people here before Columbus; that is obvious. That they were the first is not. It may not even be true. That they're called "indigenous" today means absolutely nothing.

That article starts "The indigenous peoples of the Americas are the Pre-Columbian peoples of North, Central and South America and their descendants." Some of them may have had no descendants, that doesn't make the statement wrong. If you want to challenge text at Indigenous peoples of the Americas do it there. Doug Weller talk 14:26, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Mostly peaceful protest" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Mostly peaceful protest. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 26#Mostly peaceful protest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DS alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Balkans or Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Bsoyka (talk) 20:37, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Two redirects deleted

Hello. I have deleted two redirects that you created as implausible misnomers (130572179 and 130572180). I assume that they were created as some sort of joke, but they were not appropriate. Please do not do that again. Sdrqaz (talk) 14:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Knegro" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Knegro and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 5#Knegro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:06, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alerts

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in gender-related disputes or controversies or in people associated with them. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Beccaynr (talk) 11:32, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Domimina nustio illumea

A tag has been placed on Domimina nustio illumea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 15:58, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"BLM race riots" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect BLM race riots has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 4 § BLM race riots until a consensus is reached. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 17:59, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"January 6 hostage crisis" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect January 6 hostage crisis has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 4 § January 6 hostage crisis until a consensus is reached. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:31, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"BLM insurrection" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect BLM insurrection has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 4 § BLM insurrection until a consensus is reached. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:33, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Niñ@

Hello Shankarsivarajan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Niñ@ for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Niñ@ to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

🌺 Cremastra (talk) 19:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Niñx

Hello Shankarsivarajan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Niñx for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Niñx to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

🌺 Cremastra (talk) 19:56, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"George Floyd race riots" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect George Floyd race riots has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 February 4 § George Floyd race riots until a consensus is reached. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 20:01, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"The Greater War" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Greater War has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 18 § The Greater War until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Arbeitslager, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Your redirect makes no sense, the Nazi concentration camps (konzentrationslager) were administratively separate from the Arbeitslager. Now, well meaning editors have fixed double redirects and bypassed others, meaning a lot of links go to the wrong place and actively contributing to confusion on this topic. Please don't redirect concepts you don't fully understand. (t · c) buidhe 01:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Invasion of Mexico

Hello, Shankarsivarajan

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Bgsu98 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Invasion of Mexico, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 13 § Invasion of Mexico.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Bgsu98}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bgsu98 (Talk) 02:47, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mjölnir. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Mismarked minor edit to ″fix″ spelling which introduced incorrect spelling per the source the edited content was citing, apparently not the first time you make disruptive edits, try to pay attention. TylerBurden (talk) 20:20, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TylerBurden "Asatruar" is by far most commonly used spelling, both on Wikipedia itself and the wider web more generally. Shankar Sivarajan (talk) 20:25, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]