User talk:Shane Editor

February 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Chaudhary Charan Singh Airport have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Chaudhary Charan Singh Airport was changed by Shane Editor (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.875692 on 2022-02-03T14:14:58+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:15, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Lucknow, you may be blocked from editing. Your change was not supported by the cited reference. David Biddulph (talk) 17:53, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Ost316. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Gautam Buddh Nagar District. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ost (talk) 16:55, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucknow Police (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by RPSkokie were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucknow Police and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucknow Police, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 03:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shane Editor! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! RPSkokie (talk) 03:49, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Chaudhary Charan Singh Airport. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Adakiko (talk) 10:45, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucknow Police (February 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NORG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucknow Police and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucknow Police, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 12:25, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lucknow City Police moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lucknow City Police, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 06:10, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uttar Pradesh elections

Hello. Regardingn your repeated edits to this template, it is for state-level elections (or sets of elections). However, you are welcome to create a separate template for Lucknow (e.g. {{Lucknow elections}}).

Also, you should be aware of WP:BRD; this is a behavioural expectation that means if an edit you make is reverted, you should not reinstate it, but should instead discuss on the talk page to try and gain consensus for your change. Cheers, Number 5 7 13:22, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is the problem with you man? Have seen the template of Maharashtra elections there is a separate section for the bmc elections that is the elections in mumbai, the capital of Maharashtra. Bmc is the biggest corporation in the maharshtra state. Vice versa Lmc is the biggest corporation in uttar pradesh thats why i have given it a different section Shane Editor (talk) 13:57, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't a problem, and it's not a very nice way to respond. Thanks for letting me know about the {{Maharashtra elections}} template – BMC elections shouldn't be listed there, as it's not a state-level election – there are also election articles for Pune MC, but they are not in the template. So instead I've created {{Maharashtra municipal corporation elections}} that covers both MCs, and other can be added. Perhaps you could create a similar template for Uttar Pradesh; setting out the elections for other MCs (in addition to Lucknow) in the template might help encourage article creation. Cheers, Number 5 7 18:49, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lucknow Police (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lucknow Police and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Lucknow Police, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 14:59, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lucknow Development Authority

Hello Shane Editor,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Lucknow Development Authority for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 17:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Chaudhary Charan Singh International Airport. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. --Finngall ^talk 20:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Varanasi City Police Commissionerate. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. CUPIDICAE💕 17:11, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dmartin969. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chaudhary Charan Singh International Airport without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Improper use of speedy deletion. If you genuinely believe the page should be deleted, use WP:RFD –DMartin 10:56, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Please consider this a final warning for your inappropriate edits, for which you've been warned many times. If you continue, you will be blocked Star Mississippi 03:05, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Chaudhary Charan Singh Airport, you may be blocked from editing. This includes you adding airlines considering LKO as hub. No airline operates with LKO as hub, also go though Airline hub to clearly understand what it means. — LeoFrank ^Talk 17:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Varanasi City Police Commissionerate for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Varanasi City Police Commissionerate, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varanasi City Police Commissionerate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 3 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Varanasi City Police Commissionerate, you may be blocked from editing. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:26, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't done that please check it ones Shane Editor (talk) 07:18, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 18:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Varanasi City Police Commissionerate for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Varanasi City Police Commissionerate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Varanasi City Police Commissionerate (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Star Mississippi 13:25, 21 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uttar Pradesh Legislature, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dinesh Sharma. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chaudhary Charan Singh Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adani.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lucknow Police Commissionerate

Hello, Shane Editor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lucknow Police Commissionerate, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:03, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Lucknow Police Commissionerate

Hello, Shane Editor. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Lucknow Police Commissionerate".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:57, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lucknow Rural Police

The article Lucknow Rural Police has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable minor police department. No real redirect target

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Alyo (chat·edits) 15:52, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Yogi Adityanath, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. See WP:INDICSCRIPT. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 18:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 00:23, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have reverted my action in no moment then now tell me that where you have the source of information that Keshav Prasad Maurya and Brajesh Pathak are the deputy leaders of the Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly. It is also of without information. Shane Editor (talk) 17:14, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 16:54, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Iam here for about 4 years I know better than you that what we have do here. Don't tell me like you are an owner of wikipedia. The changes i had done in the infobox of BRSABV Ekana Cricket stadium what is the problem in that? Shane Editor (talk) 16:58, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By embedding infoboxes, you were duplicating information. If a specific infobox exists (as it does in this case) we use it – embedding is then redundant and just adds superfluous code. Additionally, as below, you were also not using the parameters correctly. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 17:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I got I am not gonna add national teams in club section again but let me back with that infobox again Shane Editor (talk) 17:07, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If there was a problem with the adding national teams in club section then should only remove that only why are you just changing the whole infobox in the page. Shane Editor (talk) 17:09, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read the guidance on use of infoboxes, and the documentation for the cricket ground infobox in order to learn what the various parameters are for (e.g. national teams are not clubs). Thanks. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 16:57, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 20:23, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}} on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Venkat TL (talk) 20:51, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lucknow Police

Hello, Shane Editor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lucknow Police, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:11, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Dhruv edits (talk) 09:22, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly, you may be blocked from editing. Dhruv edits (talk) 00:44, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Uttar Pradesh Legislative Council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Principal Secretary.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Department of Medical Health and Family Welfare (Uttar Pradesh)

Your recent item has been moved to draft space. It is not yet ready for publication. Please develop in draft and it should be submitted for review when completed. Please review WP:YFA and WP:REFB. Eagleash (talk) 22:16, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive WP:ENGVAR changes

Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:56, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Yogi Adityanath ministry (2017-" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Yogi Adityanath ministry (2017- has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 18 § Yogi Adityanath ministry (2017- until a consensus is reached. Gonnym (talk) 10:05, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of international cricket centuries at the BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium Stadium

The article List of international cricket centuries at the BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium Stadium has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unclear why this would be a notable list topic, the stadium is not responsible for the centuries

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:54, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of List of international cricket centuries at the BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium Stadium

A tag has been placed on List of international cricket centuries at the BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium Stadium requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Fram (talk) 09:13, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls at BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joseph2302 (talk) 09:35, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of international cricket centuries at the BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international cricket centuries at the BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries at the BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 09:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with List of international cricket centuries at the BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:51, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lucknow Super Giants

We need to be able to read text on colours. Red text on a blue background is many, many things, but readable isn't one of them. At the same time you reverted my removal of the colours being listed as "Space cadet" and reinstated a totally empty table. Feel free to open a discussion on the article talk page about the use of colours, but we have a duty to make things readable, and not only for editors using a wide screen monitor and without any visual impairment. Blue Square Thing (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of international cricket centuries at the BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of international cricket centuries at the BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of international cricket centuries at the BRSABV Ekana Cricket Stadium (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 08:12, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image use in places other than articles

Recently, you have been attempting to add a non-free image to Template:Women's Premier League (cricket), as you did with this edit. Per WP:NFCC #9, we do not permit the use of non-free images on the project outside of actual articles. Please stop attempting to do this. It will always be reverted. If you have questions about this, let me know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 16:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ghaziabad Police Commissionerate for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ghaziabad Police Commissionerate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ghaziabad Police Commissionerate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:05, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Prayagraj Police Commissionerate for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prayagraj Police Commissionerate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prayagraj Police Commissionerate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:32, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Department of Medical Health and Family Welfare (Uttar Pradesh)

Hello, Shane Editor. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Department of Medical Health and Family Welfare (Uttar Pradesh), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:03, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Prayagraj Police Commissionerate) for edit warring against an AfD consensus.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:51, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bharat Ratna Shri Atal Bihari Vajpayee Ekana Cricket Stadium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joel Wilson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]