User talk:Sgovaert
Welcome
[edit]
|
Vandalism
[edit]Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Proximedia_Group. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Menutoets (talk) 12:26, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
I ignore the accusation of being a Vandal. I saw new information on the page Proximedia_Groupand I thought it seemded biased, had biased or irrelevant sources (unverifiable online fora mostly)and it contained also incorrect information. I rewrote the new paragraph to give a neutral and factual description of Proximedia_Group's sales tactics. This complies with Wikipedia's policy of NPOV and correctness. --Sgovaert (talk) 12:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
[edit]Your recent editing history at Proximedia Group shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —SMALLJIM 13:33, 4 July 2014 (UTC)