User talk:Sevelasz

December 2022

Hello, I'm FMSky. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Georges Caudron, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. FMSky (talk) 13:44, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to William H. Bailey (artist). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Aishik Rehman (talk) 23:07, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Michael Page, you may be blocked from editing. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 06:03, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please my apologies I am not trying to do that I don't even know that happens, I was just trying to fixed typo in only short description I am very shocked that I saw that is what I do is not disruptive is fixing apologies please Sevelasz (talk) 06:27, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine mistakes happen. However you really need to slow down, use the "show preview" button and take head of the warnings against inserting unsourced content above. You also need to start using edit summaries for mainspace edits see Help:Edit summary. 74.73.224.126 (talk) 06:35, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with the above warnings, Sevelasz. You don't appear sufficiently versed in English or experienced in Wikipedia's guidelines to be copy editing here. If the disruptions continue, I will request this account be blocked. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29 (talk) 06:53, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I told you that it was a huge mistake I made not with my own right and my heart if I know that will happen I may not even correct the short description I like a Wikipedia article to be long not short please Sevelasz (talk) 07:06, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, you clearly don't understand my note above, or the previous warnings. You are not proficient to edit at English Wikipedia. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29 (talk) 07:13, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize to you but you still reported me?? Sevelasz (talk) 07:15, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
you will pay for this Sevelasz (talk) 07:33, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

your hypocritical reply down

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 16:56, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're blocked for harassment (admins, see talk page history). I could have blocked you also for persistent disruptive editing, meaning unexplained and unverified changes to article content. This is your opportunity to educate yourself on how to do things more properly. In the warnings above you've been pointed to the various policies that govern edits here; please read them and act accordingly when this block expires. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 16:58, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022--continued disruption after return from block

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:0:0:0:8D29 (talk) 12:18, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please can we chat on whatsapp my friend Mr AnonymousSevelasz (talk) 12:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails the requirements of WP:NACTOR / WP:ANYBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Sevelasz/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 12:48, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sevelasz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 12:48, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What do I gonna do now for my article to be acceptedSevelasz (talk) 13:18, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 13:46, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]