User talk:Setlero

Welcome!

Hello, Setlero, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Pietrantonio Pace, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! - Mr X 15:59, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pietrantonio Pace

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pietrantonio Pace requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. - Mr X 15:59, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Pietrantonio Pace"

Pietrantonio Pace, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, you removed all content from the page or otherwise requested its deletion.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. @ 21:51, 28 March 2015 (UTC),[reply]

Dark Tale

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dark Tale, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://lostmoviesarchive.com/movie/459.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:42, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dark Tale

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dark Tale requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from lostmoviesarchive.com/movie/459. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -©2015 Compassionate727^{(Talk)(Contributions)} 17:44, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:A HEART IN THE DRAWER official poster.png

Thanks for uploading File:A HEART IN THE DRAWER official poster.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for File:De Serpentis Munere Theatrical release film poster.png

Thanks for uploading File:De Serpentis Munere Theatrical release film poster.png. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of De Serpentis Munere

The article De Serpentis Munere has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be a promotional article for a non-notable film

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Montanabw^(talk) 07:57, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:De Serpentis Munere Theatrical release film poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:De Serpentis Munere Theatrical release film poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NIGHTMARES FROM BACK official poster.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NIGHTMARES FROM BACK official poster.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mario D'Andrea for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mario D'Andrea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mario D'Andrea until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 18:41, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roberto Leoni, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages George Hilton and William Berger (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:32, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for the correction! Setlero (talk) 01:53, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Roman acqueduct

Hi, Setlero. Sorry to say this, but Bibliography sections should only contain works that have been used in the article; works that support the article text should also be by notable authors with independent support from their scholarly peers (usually in the form of a citation or quotation), or authors whose work has been positively reviewed by their peers in that field of study. I see that you've tried to create an article on Pace in the past: and that it was turned down due to lack of supporting evidence. The lack of translation is not always an insurmountable problem but lack of specialist reputation is. Pace seems to have published three editions of his work on acqueducts, none of which have apparently been reviewed. And nothing more. So the work should not be included in "Further reading" either. I've removed it, but will retain your updated link. Many thanks for reading this. Haploidavey (talk) 09:05, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. That's an amazingly detailed map; very, very detailed. Or maybe too detailed, and very hard to read at any size; I imagine that would be the case even for readers of Italian on Italian Wikipedia. It reads more like a very thorough guidebook illustration from way back than a summary for an encyclopedia article. It also looks pen-drawn. No objection to that, but can you please say on whose scholarly authority or original it's based? Thanks. I'll just remove it until we've cleared this up! Haploidavey (talk) 09:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Haploidavey, I'm really sorry for the misunderstanding. I added in the bibliography section of Roman Aqueduct the book of Pace because it is related to the detailed map of Rome's Aqueducts cured by Pace that I added to the page. As you can see on the map, it is based on the studies of the archaeologist Anna Maria Liberati who has also been director of various museums in Rome. (https://independent.academia.edu/AnnaMariaLiberati) I hope this can clear it up... Anyway, as you can see in this abstract (https://docplayer.it/26061870-Acquedotti-di-roma-e-il-de-aquaeductu-di-frontino-pietrantonio-pace.html) in Pace's book the aqueduct is presented from a structural point of view, different from the one usually followed by archaeologists in their historical-topographical descriptions. That's why this third edition is edited by the C.N.R. (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consiglio_Nazionale_delle_Ricerche) And that's why the book is present in various libraries in Italy (https://opac.sbn.it/opacsbn/opaclib?db=solr_iccu&rpnquery=%40attrset%2Bbib-1%2B%2B%40attr%2B1%3D8021%2B%40attr%2B4%3D1%2B%22IT%5C%5CICCU%5C%5CMILC%5C%5C110719%22&nentries=1&rpnlabel=+Soggetti+%3D+IT%5CICCU%5CMILC%5C110719+&resultForward=opac%2Ficcu%2Ffull.jsp&searchForm=opac%2Ficcu%2Ferror.jsp&do_cmd=search_show_cmd&refine=&saveparams=false&fname=none&from=6) and in the world, like in Harvard Widener Library (http://id.lib.harvard.edu/alma/990125714010203941/catalog) or in the Biblioteken der Universitat Heidelberg (https://katalog.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/cgi-bin/titel.cgi?katkey=3407183) or in Universiteit Bibliotheek Gent (https://lib.ugent.be/en/catalog/rug01:001260833) Setlero 11:39, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What a splendid answer! I think that in the circumstances it would be best to keep the map where it was (in the Rome section), but add some instructions and explanatory notes. Pace's book would be cited briefly in the article (and in the "references" section, as an inline reference linked to the map) and in more detail under the "Bibliography" section, explaining the work in question as a research tool. I like the map' and the authors' attempt to thoroughly embed the topic in the natural and cultivated features of the extended topography (both natural and artificial context). Invaluable! So just carry on, if that's what you'd like to do; I'll keep an eye on things and intervene if needed. It's potentially quite a difficult task, and not all the regular editors of the article will necessarily agree with this approach or the inclusion of the map. As it stands, there are probably too many maps; I'll remove one. It might help to link objectors to this conversation. Haploidavey (talk) 11:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am very happy that you appreciate how Pace's work deserves because I think he is undervalued just because he is an engineer and not an academic. I will carry on under your eyes and please, link objectors to this conversation if you think it might help. And please, excuse me for my bad English and for my little knowledge of how exactly Wikipedia works. Setlero 14:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

OK, great. The main objection others might raise is difficulty with the sheer complexity and detail of the map. You must also be very sure that your use of the map does not infringe anyone's copyright! That really is a 'must'. Could you also do a brief description of the two authors' background, and especially anything you have on the substance of Pace's work? Take your time! I'm only around on and off at the moment. Haploidavey (talk) 13:44, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Setlero 16:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Gypsy Angel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Gypsy Angel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Gypsy Angel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

BOVINEBOY2008 21:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]