User talk:Seriouspastry

Welcome!

Hello, Seriouspastry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Tina and Lolo. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! samtar ^{t} 13:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Hello, I'm Dat GuyWiki. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Mastizaade with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:32, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mastizaade with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:35, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Sara Loren. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:44, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Wedding Pullav does not have an edit summary. Diffs: [1] When you make edits like these, removing names, moving them around, removing sourced content, etc., you need to explain your edits, or they will look like vandalism to other users.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 07:18, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Mastizaade. Diffs: [2] I strongly advise you to familiarize yourself with our guidelines for reliable sources. Any-old-reference is not the same thing as a reliable source. Reliable sources have established reputations for fact-checking and a clear editorial policy. If you submit content that is unsourced or supported by a poor source like a faceless blog (like this, you will find your editing privileges interrupted. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:13, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Humaima Malick. -Managerarc™^talk 21:55, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at One Night Stand (2016 film). Diff: [3] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:09, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:52, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Given your multiple warnings and a previous block for the addition of unsourced content, I'm not sure why you thought it was ok to add this unsourced information to Mawra Hocane. Note that you need to abide by Wikipedia's policies regarding living persons and reliable sourcing or your account will likely be reblocked.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:49, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sunny Leone. Diff: [4] I'm not sure how many warnings and blocks you need before you start adding references, but we'll try one more warning before more blocks begin. "I have added her character name in two of her upcoming films. These are not false. If any problem, kindly check twitter handles of her directors." Your edit summary is particularly irritating, because you are clearly aware that information has to be sourced, yet you shift the burden to other editors to do the research for you. Not helpful. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beiimaan Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asad Khan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Seriouspastry. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm CAPTAIN RAJU. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Sunny Leone— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU ^(✉) 23:40, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kanjri No. 1

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kanjri No. 1, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Theroadislong (talk) 20:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

Hello, I'm Ravensfire. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Urwa Hocane, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Don't say a film is a porn deput for an actress without a very good source, and you didn't even bother to include a bad source. That's a WP:BLP problem and a significant one. Ravensfire (talk) 23:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Humaima Malick. More of the same unsourced vandalism. Meters (talk) 06:28, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Don't make any more unsourced claims of upcoming films or actresses with roles as whores or mistresses. In fact, don't make any more unsourced edits about anything. You have had four previous level four warnings for this, and a block. Meters (talk) 06:39, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sunny Leone, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bengali Cinema (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:15, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Seriouspastry. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Seriouspastry. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]