User talk:SergioGonza13

This is SergioGonza13's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome!

Hello, SergioGonza13! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages.

Getting Started

Introduction • Contributing to Wikipedia • Your first article
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset
How to: edit a page • upload an image

Getting Help

Policies and Guidelines

Neutral point of view • Verifiability • No original research
Reliable sources • Citing sources • Content guidelines
What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons

Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule
Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy
External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sockpuppetry
Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community

Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program
Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette
No personal attacks • Resolving disputes
Build consensus • Village pump
Discord server • IRC channels • Mailing lists
The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)

Things to do

Task Center • Be bold in editing
Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles
Join a WikiProject • Translating articles
Cleaning up: General • Copy editing • Vandalism

Miscellaneous

Happy editing! ~~~~

Your submission at Articles for creation: Napoleon Group (February 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dreamy Jazz were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Napoleon Group/sandbox/Napoleon Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Napoleon Group/sandbox/Napoleon Group, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 17:20, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SergioGonza13! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 17:20, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, SergioGonza13. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 17:21, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Questions answered on User talk:331dot at Special:Permalink/884580642#Napoleon Group Article Erase. Cabayi (talk) 10:15, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello, I'm 331dot. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to User:Napoleon Group/sandbox/Napoleon Group have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 17:37, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks buddy really appreciate it I will write again and try to be as neutral as possible

Blockchain

Please read this notice carefully.

You are receiving this notice because you recently edited one or more pages relating to blockchain or cryptocurrencies topics. You have not done anything wrong. We just want to alert you that "general" sanctions are authorized for certain types of edits to those pages.

A community decision has authorized the use of general sanctions for pages related to blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after the editor has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Cabayi (talk) 09:24, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to read Help:Archiving a talk page as blanking your talk page isn't the most community-friendly way of dealing with old messages. And adding userboxes which claim you have privileges you don't have... pfft. Cabayi (talk) 09:34, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Cabayi I don't have much experience in this community. I didn't do the blanking on purpose i though old messages don't matter if you already address them. According to userboxes I don't know what you are talking about could please be more, thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by SergioGonza13 (talk • contribs) 09:43, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OK. There's a couple of things here...

The version of your talk page where you blanked it, Special:Permalink/886137347, included :
```
{{User wikipedia/Reviewer|RFA=WP:USER}}
```
which makes the claim that you have reviewer rights which you don't yet have.
It's usual to continue a conversation on the page where it started. You can get the attention of the other editors by mentioning them User:Cabayi or {{u|Cabayi}} or {{ping|Cabayi}} and signing your post in the same edit.
Please sign your posts on talk pages. The standard message will explain it better than I can so here it is...

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you.

I can set up archiving on your talk page if you like.

I think that's enough for now.

Ping me if I can help. Happy editing. Cabayi (talk) 10:08, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Okk User:Cabayi yes, I was trying to get my article reviewed before published that's why I put {{User wikipedia/Reviewer|RFA=WP:USER}} obviously did it in the wrong way. Thanks for your help. One last quick question about my article, I read the blockchain issue. Now I have to wait to be reviewed right? thanks again and sorry for the misunderstanding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SergioGonza13 (talk • contribs) 10:18, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. We all start from the same point, and there's lots to learn. You created the article in mainspace rather than draftspace so (at the risk of having it deleted) you've skipped the wait for review. WP:AFC is the safe way to create an article.

Napoleon Group's external links need some attention - some should be references, others are de trop, WP:ELMINOFFICIAL. Cabayi (talk) 10:55, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Napoleon Group moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Napoleon Group, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, SergioGonza13. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GSS if you have time could you tell me where do you think its appear like advertising? I'm trying to be as neutral as possible and no I Don't have any relation with that company just a fan of their project :) . Thank you for all the help and attention!

Your draft article, Draft:Napoleon Group

Hello, SergioGonza13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Napoleon Group".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 21:59, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:SergioGonza13/sandbox

Hello, SergioGonza13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:SergioGonza13/sandbox.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:37, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]