User talk:Semiramiscan

Welcome!

Hello, Semiramiscan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Domitius 20:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kurdistan Workers Party

There is a tendency on Wikipedia to not refer to the PKK as a terrorist organization, see WP:WTA. The article already mentions that NATO and the EU, as well as all these states consider the PKK terrorists. See the talkpage, this has been debated extensively and the article version I restored is what was agreed on. I'm not saying it's impossible to change the status quo, I'm just saying that you'll have to convince a lot of people. Regards and welcome to Wikipedia.--Domitius 20:13, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I understand you point. Give me a few minutes please to post your observations to the article's talkpage so everyone who edits this article will know about your concerns and can reply to them; I'm sure something can be worked out. The "rule" you were probably thinking about which involved ignoring rules when necessary was WP:IAR.--Domitius 20:32, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see my request here (sorry if my Turkish is bad :p). I'm going offline now (I can't be on the computer all the time), but I'll post a message here as soon as I know there has been a reply. Thanks.--Domitius 20:45, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Bertilvidet 09:49, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Olympics articles

Please provide sources for the changes you made to articles related to the Olympic Games and Turkey, if they are accurate. -- Jonel | Speak 20:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WPTR

VikiProje Türkiye'ye davet / Invitation to join WikiProject Turkey

Merhaba, sizin VikiProje Türkiye'ye katılabileceğinizi düşündük. Ayrıca yalnız başınıza ya da diğer kullanıcılarla birlikte Türkiye ile ilgili maddeleri düzenleyip geliştirebilirsiniz. Eğer projemize katılmak istiyorsanız lütfen katılımcılar sayfasını ziyaret edin ve adınızı yazın ya da projenin tartışma sayfasına tıklayın. Eğer herhangi bir sorunuz varsa benimle ya da bir başka VikiProje Türkiye üyesi ile bağlantı kurabilirsiniz.

Hi, I was thinking that maybe you would like to join the WikiProject Turkey. There you can also find and contact users who are trying to improve Turkey-related articles. If you would like to get involved, just visit the participants page and/or inquire at the project's talk page. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or other member of the WikiProject Turkey.

Cheers! Baristarim 22:09, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Call for AMA Coordination Election

("Automated" message) User:CyclePat has proposed to call for a new AMA Coordination election [1]. Independently of your supporting or oppossing to this call, I ask you to contact other 5 active members in order to get a reasonable quorum. Thanks in advance. --Neigel von Teighen 08:49, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Şahin K

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ✤ JonHarder ^talk 18:32, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

I have clearly stated that that was not a vandalist act but a protest for biased articles. If you can suggest me another method of protesting highly biased articels please...

My friend, I've been striving to prove my point in Talk Pages but nobodys seems to understand it. They don't even accept the fact that PKK has killed and still kills civilians which makes it a terrosrist organization --Canosman 19:02, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shan't encyclopedies be imparital? What is the source statsing Pkk is not terrorist? --Canosman 19:10, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So you want source eh?

[[2]]
[[3]]
[[4]]

"US STATE DEPARTMENT: “THE PKK IS A TERRORIST ORGANIZATION” US State Department deputy spokesman Adam Ereli said yesterday that Washington’s position on the PKK was clear, as the Bush administration considers it a terrorist organization. “We work closely with Turkey and with Iraq in preventing the use of Iraqi territory by the PKK for its activities,” he said at a daily press briefing in Washington. “We will continue to have good and close coordination with the authorities in both countries on what is a commonly shared problem.” Asked whether the US military has issued a direct order to arrest top leaders of PKK in northern Iraq, Ereli declined to comment, telling reporters that they should address that question to the Defense Department, since it deals with military issues. /Hurriyet/ "

[[5]]
[[6]]

Would you like any more sources or will you add this to the article. You know this is an encyclopedia I have evidence but you dont't. --Semiramiscan 19:23, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So I take it this is an admission that you were using sock puppets for the express purpose of disrupting wikipedia and committing vandalism?--VectorPotential^Talk 19:26, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nope it's my brother. He knows about this better. And YOU he has perfectly proven my point and you are attacking us. SHAME ON YOU --Canosman 19:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And now I copy all of this nonsense to your talk page, and I take this to WP:ANi--VectorPotential^Talk 19:33, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Isn't it great that WP:NPA violations often come to your very doorstep? —Kurykh 22:49, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking talk page comments

I see that you've already been blocked for incivility, so there's probably no need in additional action, but I want to know why you blanked this comment from my talk page. Please refrain from doing so in the future... I have no idea who you are, or how you stumbled across that issue, but such removals aren't acceptable. Thanks. /Blaxthos 00:33, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am extremely sorry I have done it accidentally and now realized that I cannot post it on your talk page right now due to the ipblock on the internet cafe I am in right now. --Semiramiscan 00:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

Clearing an autoblock

Due to the nature of the block applied we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. If you are still autoblocked by the time you read this message, please follow these instructions:

If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.
Try to edit the Sandbox.
Copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "IP blocked?" section.
Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.

If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. -- Netsnipe ► 00:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Semiramiscan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Some user named Kelhocan was banned because of vandalism with his IP. The problem is I am in an internetcafe right now and cannot edit any articles. I tried sandbox but couldn't edit it either. (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

original block message

Blocking administrator: not provided (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: reason sockpuppetry of Kelhocan— ⇒ SWATJester ^{Denny Crane.} 01:10, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]