User talk:Selimee

Safe Weddings (novel) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Safe Weddings (novel). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:54, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello@Significa liberdade,

Thank you for the feedback and guidance. I’ll work on improving the draft and adding more sources to establish its notability. Selimee (talk) 09:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Selimee, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:54, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:57, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Olive Trees of the Streets moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Olive Trees of the Streets. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:59, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello@Significa liberdade

Thank you for the feedback! I will review and improve the draft accordingly. Selimee (talk) 09:52, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Fairy (novel) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Fairy (novel). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Frost 23:47, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thursday Break moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Thursday Break. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Frost 23:50, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Globalization and National Identity moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Globalization and National Identity. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and Fails WP:NBOOKS, There are no book reviews available, and no literary awards have been received.. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Charlie (talk) 15:30, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A Life in Administration and In the Eye of the Storm (book)

Hi! I have moved In the Eye of the Storm (book) to Draft:In the Eye of the Storm (book) and In the Eye of the Storm (book) to Draft:In the Eye of the Storm (book) because they both aren't ready for publishing yet. They need more references to be added to help the page meet WP:NBOOK. It would also help to rewrite the pages a little. This page explains how to write a good article about a nonfiction book. The page doesn't have to match the suggestions perfectly, but it might help you to base the page partly off this. BuySomeApples (talk) 02:00, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: In the Eye of the Storm (book) (January 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please add multiple reviews on the book with reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:In the Eye of the Storm (book) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RangersRus (talk) 17:58, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]