User talk:Sei Noelle

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Sei Noelle! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 22:23, Thursday, December 13, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Your submission at Articles for creation: Snorri Hjartarson (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Snorri Hjartarson instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is essentially the same as the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Snorri Hjartarson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Snorri Hjartarson, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:13, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sei Noelle! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:13, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:52, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sei Noelle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I thought that after staying off Wikipedia for several months, I would be allowed to edit here again. I have not been vandalizing at all, and am hoping to complete the Counter-Vandalism Unit Academy course so I can help fight vandalism. How do I get to the point of being allowed to edit Wikipedia again? Sei Noelle (talk) 03:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You need to post any unblock requests on your original account. Generally you need to wait at least six months with no socking before asking to be unblocked. Sock accounts are almost never unblocked. Please read WP:SO for more information. Be aware that six months is not carved in stone. It is the customary minimum but editors and reviewing admins may demand a longer period depending on the situation. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:13, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Ad Orientem: There is one problem with using my original account-it is now totally locked, so I can't even log into it. And I don't know how to fix that. Is there no way that I could just use this account here from now on? I'm willing to abide by any restrictions or final warnings you might place on me if I was unblocked on this account. Sei Noelle (talk) 03:20, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just an add-on: I checked the block log for my Skiyomi account, and it was only blocked on Wikipedia for 31 hours. https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/block&page=User%3ASkiyomi So I'm confused as to how I am considered to be block-evading here.

I have confirmed that your account has been globally locked. Only a Steward can unlock your account. You may lodge your appeal here. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:32, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will try that.

Regrettably as your legitimate account is currently subject to a global lock I am now going to have to revoke your TPA here. I wish you good luck in your appeal assuming you do wish to contribute constructively. -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:45, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]