User talk:Seewithfingers

December 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nonviolent resistance has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nonviolent resistance was changed by Seewithfingers (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853493 on 2016-12-03T08:39:02+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:39, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Daniel Mulloy, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 08:58, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sophie Dee, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 10:03, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Llansteffan. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kleuske (talk) 11:25, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Llangynog, Carmarthenshire. Theroadislong (talk) 11:32, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Llansteffan

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Llansteffan, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:49, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adding opinions

Please don't insert opinions about things to articles. Adding "highly" as an adverb to descriptions, for instance, can only be your opinion and doesn't actually tell the reader anything useful, because there is no indication to what degree you are measuring things. Also stating that a fact is "known" is unhelpful, as it isn't explained who is doing the knowing, or why it hasn't just been stated as a fact. This is especially the case when the claim is unreferenced. Could you also please use the edit summaries, it helps other editors understand what you are doing. Thanks. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 13:52, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

... and adding "celebrated", as you did on Sophie Dee, is unsourced peacockery/puffery and does not belong here. So please stop. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 14:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Elis James. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for adding totally unsourced puffery on a considerable number of articles. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 14:56, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Daniel Kaluuya BABY shortfilm image.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Daniel Kaluuya BABY shortfilm image.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:Una noche poster US.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Una noche poster US.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 16:45, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:HOME(2016film)poster.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:HOME(2016film)poster.jpeg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 01:55, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]