User talk:Securearth

Welcome!

Hello, Securearth!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~), be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Tacyarg (talk) 00:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Cinema of India, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Geniac (talk) 18:19, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rajneesh, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:25, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shweta Mehta (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shweta Mehta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Shweta Mehta, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 11:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Securearth! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 11:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shweta Mehta (September 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Akevsharma was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shweta Mehta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Akevsharma (talk) 10:50, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bharati Script has been accepted

Bharati Script, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Doric Loon (talk) 11:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for submitting this article. Please do continue to work on it. Two things strike me: first, we can't actually see any examples of the script, apart from that logo-type image at the top. I would like to see a photo of a book or something printed in the script, and also a table showing us the characters and their values. Second, we need something about the reception. One of the sources you cited suggests criticism: why not just use the Latin alphabet? But you haven't addressed that. We need more on the response: how well has it been received, who is using it, etc. Good luck. --Doric Loon (talk) 11:34, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it is actually my first article that is approved. Regarding the examples, i am going to add them soon, also some Indian story books have been transliterated into the script by the volunteers, i am gonna add them soon as well. Regarding the criticism: why not just use Latin characters, the Latin script would give ambiguous sounds in Indian languages, like some sounds can be represented by both c and k, and people tend to use a and aa interchangably sometimes, and also we can not use diacritics on Latin characters, because it would not be feasible to teach them to masses instead of this bharati script which is easier to teach as the system clearly resembles the characters of indian languages and their diacritics. But i think this all are my views, so they are "original research" so i am not gonna add that Securearth (talk) 12:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Shweta Mehta

Hello, Securearth. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Shweta Mehta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:02, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quick note on Uniform Civil Code

Thanks for your edits to Uniform Civil Code. Please refrain from creating deliberate factual errors like you did here Special:Diff/1080088966. Unsubstantiated claims shouldn't be added. QueerEcofeminist🌈 03:04, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shweta Mehta

Hello, Securearth. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Shweta Mehta".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 14:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:SBP DAV Centenary Public School, Fatehabad

Hello, Securearth. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:SBP DAV Centenary Public School, Fatehabad, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:02, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:SBP DAV Centenary Public School, Fatehabad

Hello, Securearth. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "SBP DAV Centenary Public School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:54, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]