User talk:Sbabones

Welcome!

Hello, Sbabones, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Acalamari 22:21, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from Piotr

Some links of interest: Wikipedia:WikiProject Classroom coordination, Wikipedia:School and university projects. When shall we create a subpage for the course? We could ask all the students to sign themselves in on it so that we know the names of their accounts. Looking forward to seeing your reply on my talkpage.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 22:39, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your purpose here

Hello Sbabones, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your class project has come to the attention of a few editors here, and some of them are concerned that it may not be compatible with the purposes of Wikipedia. Could you clarify exactly what the project is, so that concerns can be put to rest? Sarcasticidealist (talk) 17:17, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion can be found here. Please note that in a few days it will expire and be archived.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:13, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you'd be amused

[1]. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 20:42, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Christopher Chase-Dunn

You seem to be afraid that this article is in danger of being deleted in short order. Actually, despite the appearance of three warning messages on the first draft, it's quite likely to be safe, so I wouldn't worry. Being as how you are an academic, I'm sure your quite aware of the need of proper references to reliable sources, with footnoting and all that. Wikipedia requires much the same thing so that its articles can be trusted. It's quite the struggle — I spend much time on what we call new-page patrol, where all manner of dreck and even absolute gibberish comes seeping through and must be dealt with. The occasional article that is good right off the bat comes through, with more falling short of that at first but still worthy candidates for inclusion. Your article about Chase-Dunn falls in the last category. All that is needed are the references — you're best to supply those, since you're much more familiar with the subject — and others can take care of the other details such as formatting, style and those other little things peculiar to Wikipedia.

In short, don't worry. A cursory Google search turns up numerous ghits on Chase-Dunn, so notability is not in question. And there's no time constraints to speak of. Most of all, if you have questions or need help, just ask. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 08:21, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Sbabones! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Christopher Chase-Dunn - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:12, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC David SG Goodman was accepted

David SG Goodman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 17:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sbabones. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fake article

As you can see, we have had some fun with your user page. The sending to MfD was an angry reaction on my part because I thought it was you that had reverted the page. But as it stands it is undoubtedly a WP:FAKEARTICLE - absolutely no mention of Wikipedia!. Writing about oneself in the third person is horribly stilted. As a matter of urgency will you please re-word in the first person and tell us what you are doing on Wikipedia instead of just giving us a CV. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:32, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Immediately after writing the above I noticed that you had had the page in an acceptable state in the past so I have reverted to that. Surely Josve05a (talk · contribs) will not try to object to the state at this moment since it is a copy of this edit by you. By all means update this page to tell us that you have gone down under and what you are currently getting your students to do. But please retain the first person style. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:46, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing forbids a user from talking in third person. It is however a despicable thing to edit another users userpage, imo. I urge you to take a step back and take a breather and let the page be, since it has been like that since 2012. You can ask him to change it, but you should not change it for him. One does not need to mention Wikipedia in their userpage, it is there to present oneself to the community however they please (kinda). (t) Josve05a (c) 01:00, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let me reiterate, I suggest you leave this be, or follow the normal Wikipedia:Dispute resolution procedures, since this is bordering on harrasment imo.

Leaving salty (sub-par) responses to message your your user talk page about a deletion of another users draft page.
Removing content from userpage and leaving note on userpage (almost userpage vandalism)
Nominating it for deletion.
Reverting userpage that has had the same content since 2012 to an old version.

Continue down this path, and we'll all see where we end up. (t) Josve05a (c) 01:11, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is getting ridiculous. I hope that Salvatore has now got a clear idea of what I find acceptable on a user page. I will stand back for a week and hope that Salvatore will create a page acceptable to me. If not, I shall seek other opinions. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:32, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do seek a third opinion. You state that we should wait for him to change to meet your satisfaction...well good thing that you aren't "In charge", otherwise that would have been extortion and harrasment. (t) Josve05a (c) 01:37, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(@RHaworth: Just know I can also find a 3o by "my cabal" to support my side. Best thing would be to just leave it be and let it evolve naturally...) (t) Josve05a (c) 01:42, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@RHaworth and Josve05a: This is unacceptable behavior from the both of you. Edit warring over a user page that contains a small autobiographical blurb has got to be one of the lamest things I've ever seen on the project. RHaworth, if you believe the user page should be deleted or significantly altered, nominate it for discussion at WP:MFD. This is certainly not such a blatant violation of any guideline to justify repeated removals. WP:UPYES specifically allows "limited autobiographical content". Josve05a, a threat to recruit involved editors to sway a discussion is contrary to WP:CANVASS, and your side of the edit-warring is no better. None of this is worth driving off a professor who's incorporating Wikipedia into the classroom, and you're both contributing to that possibility. If this disruption continues from either side, I will have to block one or both of you. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 02:23, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To clarify the "threat to recruit involved editors to sway a discussion", I was merly respondering the same tone that I would also ask for another opinion, since in my eyes it read as though he would canvass for his point. I was just replying "if you do so, and I'll do the same, so it won't matter." (t) Josve05a (c) 03:02, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What the hell is going on here? Leave that user's userpage alone. Also, you realize this person alread has an article (Salvatore Babones)? I guess he just never bothered to link it on his user page, but he is a notable academic. Here you are helping to create another academic, who tried to contribute to Wikipedia, and now it is a good chance he will tell stories how he was rudely treated by some anonymous volunteers. PS. Salvatore, let me apologize on behalf of the community for this weird incident, please realize most of us do appreciate your contributions, and this is all just a technical misunderstanding about issues which are not at all your fault. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:34, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

÷== Response == Thank you everyone for your interest, comments, and support. I hope we can now let this issue drop. I can't imagine that anyone could object to my new user page. If it is inappropriate to link to my (external) website, please let me know and I'll delete the link (myself). Thanks all -- Salvatore

I can't imagine anyone here objecting to that, but let me echo Piotr: The other version was fine, too, and none of this mess was your fault. Thanks for sticking with us despite these occasional bumps in the road. WhatamIdoing (talk) 04:33, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I think your userspage was fine, and the new one is fine too. I'd encourage you to also link to Salvatore Babones :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:53, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Piotr, that's very kind of you to suggest, but it would seem somewhat presumptuous! S.

File:31 Perryview Ave, Pittsburgh, PA.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:31 Perryview Ave, Pittsburgh, PA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:07, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Fourth Political Theory

Hello, Sbabones. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Fourth Political Theory".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 05:08, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Five Poisons concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Five Poisons, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Five Poisons

Hello, Sbabones. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Five Poisons".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. » Shadowowl Marcos Rodriguez | t | SPI | AIV | Sandbox | Helpdesk » 19:20, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Globalization of Champagne concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Globalization of Champagne, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Globalization of Champagne

Hello, Sbabones. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Globalization of Champagne".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 05:33, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sbabones. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sbabones. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rowan Dean (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Milowent was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Has Mr. Dean been profiled in major non-affiliated news publications? I am not seeing evidence of notability at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rowan Dean and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rowan Dean, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Milowent • ^hasspoken 17:25, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sbabones! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Milowent • ^hasspoken 17:25, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Rowan Dean concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rowan Dean, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:06, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Photo of Salvatore Babones-4.jpg

The file File:Photo of Salvatore Babones-4.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Photo of Salvatore Babones-3.jpg

The file File:Photo of Salvatore Babones-3.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Photo of Salvatore Babones.jpg

The file File:Photo of Salvatore Babones.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 02:21, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]