User talk:Saudmujadidi

I will try if can specifically tell me or you can discuss here the points to be included. ScholarM (talk) 18:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Abdul-Qadir Gilani has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Abdul-Qadir Gilani was changed by Saudmujadidi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95325 on 2015-01-24T08:56:49+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:56, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saudmujadidi. You have new messages at ClueBot Commons's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I see what you did there

I don't know if you have any sort of connection to MSOAMU but all the same, you're attempts to use Wikipedia as a propaganda vehicle for the Barelvi movement will fail. If you have any sincerity in regard to actually wanting to improve the encyclopedia, go read WP:IRS and WP:NPOV before randomly reverting without discussion again. If you continue the way you are now, then things will not end up well for you. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:27, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shah Turab ul Haq

The article Shah Turab ul Haq has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no reliable references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. - Anjana Larka 07:48, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Masud Ahmed

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Dr. Masud Ahmed requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Yintan 10:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Your addition to Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 01:01, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you mention the content which is copyright dear, --Saudmujadidi (talk) 06:36, 26 November 2016 (UTC) I never used any content from this website: https://riathuddin.wordpress.com/2015/05/21/faiz-e-raza-sayedi-ala-hazrat-imam-ahmad-raza-khan-r-a/ You might have some confusion regarding , this or there may be someone else using this content.--Saudmujadidi (talk) 06:39, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Khadim Hussain Rizvi) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Khadim Hussain Rizvi, Saudmujadidi!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please look over Khadim Hussain Rizvi - it's at risk of deletion.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 17:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Khadim Hussain Rizvi

The article Khadim Hussain Rizvi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017

When you change a sentence like:

"Unlike most other Muslim movements in the region, the Barelvis opposed the Indian independence movement "

to:

"Unlike most other Muslim movements in the region, the Barelvis supported the Indian independence movement"

you need to provide more explanation than "Added few details". I noticed that some of what you changed had citations.

When you correct errors in Wikipedia, please provide explanations for why you are doing it: e.g. the source says.... There is an article talk page for each article that you can use to explain things on.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:22, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Barelvi

Hi-- Some of your edits to Barelvi added properly sourced content, but they also removed or changed properly sourced content, which we are not allowed to do per WP:NPOV. According to this policy, when there is disagreement between reliable sources, all the views need to be represented proportionally. You're welcome to reincorporate the additional material in a policy-compliant way. However, please make sure the sources meet the criteria of WP:RS and are properly cited (WP:CITEHOW). In particular, book citations need to include page numbers. Eperoton (talk) 21:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Darul Uloom Amjadia

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. Saudmujadidi, thanks for creating Darul Uloom Amjadia!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. "millions of Scholars" seems hyperbolic. Please stick to the facts and reference independent, reliable sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 20:07, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Writes clean with less or no spelling or grammatical errors. SpeakTruth! (talk) 19:34, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Saudmujadidi (talk) 14:36, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Single-purpose account

@Saudmujadidi: Just take a look, Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, Wikipedia:Single-purpose account, Wikipedia:Canvassing, WP:FAMILY, WP:MTPPT, WP:SOCKING, Wikipedia:Respect privacy, Wikipedia:Oversight, WP:BULLY. 72.52.87.49 (talk) 09:15, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tehreek Labaik Pakistan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tehreek Labaik Pakistan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tehreek Labaik Pakistan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Greenbörg (talk) 07:47, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

COI on Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi

Please do not edit Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi directly. You have a declared COI on this topic. Please make any edit suggestions on the talk page, placing {{request edit}} at the top of your request. Thanks. — nihlus kryik (talk) 05:18, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to protect the page from being edited by unregistered user and that's all. Please could you help. Saudmujadidi (talk) 05:22, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:PP/WP:PREEMPTIVE, applying page protection in a pre-emptive measure is contrary to the open nature of Wikipedia and is generally not allowed if applied for these reasons. — nihlus kryik (talk) 05:25, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can remove it if you consider me wrong.Saudmujadidi (talk) 09:44, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Saudmujadidi, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting in defense of unsourced material

Okay, this has gone on for long enough. You need to seriously step back from editing for a bit and take another look at site policies.

Wikipedia:Verifiability: proper citation requires a format that readers can actually look up.
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources: following from that, proper sources should be formal, professional works from recognized publishers/organizations.
Wikipedia:Edit warring: reverting another editors decisions will not actually solve a dispute.

During the past week or so, most of your edits have been to the articles Akhtar Raza Khan, Bahishti Zewar, Abdul-Qadir Gilani, or Ashraf Ali Thanwi. All of your edits on those articles have been reverted by other editors due to two factors: you either insert unsourced material, or your insert contentious material with citations that consist only of names. On multiple occasions, other users have tried to explain to you (and not just in the past week) why that sort of editing is wrong. You haven't responding except in one case, and your response itself displayed a disregard for Wikipedia policy.
I'm sure that you're able of making valid and helpful contributions to Wikipedia, but you need to slow down and take some time to learn about how the site works. The Tea House (the place where you accused me of bullying before getting hit with the boomerang due to your COI, if you remember) can provide help in regard to learning the details of site policies and guidelines. If you choose to continue editing in the same way you've been, then you're highly likely to end up explaining yourself on the edit warring noticeboard. If you would just take a brief amount of time to edit uncontentious subjects, especially if you sought the help of a mentor, you'd likely find a much more positive reception to your efforts. Please think about all of this carefully. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:33, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You check these mentioned pages again I have added citation on all & it seems you are only behind my edits 😁Saudmujadidi (talk) 04:21, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, you haven't added citation on all of them upon further inspection.

On Ahmed Raza Khan Barelvi, you just did the same exact thing that multiple users have warned you against: inserting highly contentious claims with only names as your "citation." I already recommended the above policies for you to review, so by now (especially after two years of these same problems), you should be aware that your edit was incorrect.
On Husayn ibn Ali, you insertded a photo into an article already crowded with photos, getting yourself reverted by an editor with a better understanding of WP:IG.
On Muhammad Ali Jinnah, you inserted some weird fringe claims sources with (again) a name and a sketchy source, getting yourself reverted by yet another editor concerned with reliability issues.

So I'm really not sure what you're referring to when you claim to "have added citation on all." My previous comments on your editing behavior still stand, and I still highly encourage you to seek a mentor before continuing. It's abundantly clear that you have a number of misunderstandings of site policy and basic framework, and as a result, your edits are merely creating more cleanup work for your fellow editors without positively contributing to the encyclopedia. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Saudmujadidi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Saudmujadidi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

Hello, I'm CASSIOPEIA. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Muhammad Ilyas Qadri— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 06:59, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

دعوت اسلامی

آپ اپنا دعوت اسلامی متعلق بغض فیس بک پر استعمال کریں، ویکیپیڈیا پر نہیں۔--Obaid Raza (talk) 06:34, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

there is nothing that you consider as my bughz(hatred) , it is just that here we intend to create a neutral point of view without exceeding limits of praising what appears to be our own Point of view.Where do you found me incorrect you could guide. Nothing I write without proofs.Saudmujadidi (talk) 06:45, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

اچھا تو آپ نے بریلوی تحریک کے سانچے میں سے دعوت اسلامی اور محمد الیاس قادری کے ناموں ہی کو کویں نکالا؟ اور ان نام کے ساتھ رضویہ ضیائیہ کو بھی آپ نے ہٹایا، یہ کون سا نیوٹرل پوائٹ ہے، مجھے بھی بتائیے، تاکہ میں اس پر عمل کر سکوں، مجھے بھی 4 سال ہو گئے، ایڈمن بنے ویکیپیڈیا پر۔ --Obaid Raza (talk) 19:49, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I would try to change if it had occured , you might be his mureed so might consider me like this, I have no such means behind it. .Saudmujadidi (talk) 10:42, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Arshadul Qadri. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:47, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I personally know the author of the book and his family, hence it's not vandalism but truth.Saudmujadidi (talk) 11:50, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please review policies on both reliable sources and on conflict of interest. If you feel that the book mentioned is not about Qadri, I suggest you explain the removal on the talk page—especially since your edit summary implies that all that was wrong with the edit was that the title (of the book?) was wrong. —C.Fred (talk) 13:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

expansion of sunni articles

Salam> Sunni articles need expansion can you work on it one by one like on Barelvi page more info is needed.ScholarM (talk) 10:45, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

sure. cud i get yr watsap no. Saudmujadidi (talk) 11:19, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Naqi Ali Khan

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Naqi Ali Khan. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. A name change of the subject away from that of the article name marked as WP:MINOR (I haven't checked if there's been an attempt to source it) is essentially disruptive in itself Djm-leighpark (talk) 05:14, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

Suna Jungle rat andheri Chayi badli kali hai.

Sone walo jagte rahiyo choro ki rakhwali hai. Maslak ka yahan dhyan rakhio, chor chamar lage pade hain.

Logicalpointing (talk) 12:05, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hammad Raza Khan moved to draftspace

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Hammad Raza Khan, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 09:26, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Muzaffar Shah Qadri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muzaffar Shah Qadri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muzaffar Shah Qadri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Zsohl ^(Talk) 14:35, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hammad Raza Khan

Hello, Saudmujadidi. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hammad Raza Khan, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hammad Raza Khan

Hello, Saudmujadidi. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Hammad Raza Khan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:11, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]