User talk:Satish weicao
July 2018
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. In some of your recent edits to Mithila (region), it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Jakichandan (talk) 17:30, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Jakichandan. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, so it has been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jakichandan (talk) 02:46, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mithila (region). Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place
{{Help me}}
on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mithila (region) was changed by Satish weicao (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951427 on 2018-07-05T20:53:20+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:53, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Mithila (region) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Abecedare (talk) 01:19, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Maithils, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Maithils was changed by Satish weicao (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.874346 on 2018-07-07T00:40:43+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:40, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Abecedare (talk) 00:45, 7 July 2018 (UTC)