User talk:Santssocial

Welcome!

Hello, Santssocial, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Santssocial/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Whpq (talk) 17:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Santssocial/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Santssocial/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://thapal.com/phpfiles/fotr_artcl.php?id=WHQvcXBWR0RNV1EwQmdYTGw1eXU1Zz09. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 17:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And now I've had to delete it again, as you'd added copyvio content about something called Digitalyoke. If you again add to this project copyright content from outside sources you may be prevented from making further edits here.

There's another problem: your only edits to date have been attempts to promote non-notable businesses. Wikipedia does not tolerate promotion of any kind. What is your relationship to this business? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:02, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Orange Mike | Talk 06:40, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Santssocial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please help me, I tried to create 2 pages in one account, I don't know that it is not fair. I want to create a page called Digitalyoke. Please.. I tried many days,, I am so sad about this.. Please help me. I trust you that you will help me sure..Santssocial (talk) 06:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reasons for your block, which are your inappropriate username and promotional edits. Please review WP:PROMO, WP:COI, and WP:PAID. Please also follow the instructions above to choose a new username. Wikipedia is not for advertising. This is an encyclopedia. If you want to edit about subjects that you are not associated with, please tell us what those might be. I would also note that you may find it more comfortable to edit the version of Wikipedia in your native language. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 11:00, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Santssocial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hi sir, I am trying to make a page called Digitlayoke. Actually I am a beginner, so i am little confused. Please understand me. Honestly I want to create a knowledge graph, For this I want to create a wikipedia page. So I'm trying to create the page. Please guide me.. Faithfully, SeenuSantssocial (talk) 10:53, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Right, and that was totally inappropriate. You won't be unblocked to do that again. If you wish to be unblocked, read WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, WP:USERNAME, and WP:UPE and follow the instructions provided above. Yamla (talk) 11:12, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Santssocial (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23805 was submitted on Jan 22, 2019 11:05:35. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 11:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]