User talk:Sangitha rani111

Welcome!

Hello, Sangitha rani111! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 03:23, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

April 2015

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Nakon 03:49, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pallava dynasty has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pallava dynasty was changed by Sangitha rani111 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.853654 on 2015-04-23T03:51:03+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:51, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sangitha rani111, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Sangitha rani111!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi

Play The Wikipedia Adventure

This message was delivered by HostBot (talk) 17:21, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vanniyar

HI, I think it might be best not to worry about this issue and just undo it. The point is fairly minor and sometimes it is better to let small things pass. They can always be fixed at a later date by using other sources etc to elaborate on things. As it is, some people might think you are now edit warring, and that is not a good situation to be in. So, all things considered, I think you should revert that change.

I am not an admin, by the way. I'm not sure if you were referring to me in the edit summary or not but the chances of me becoming an admin are incredibly small. Obviously, I do have a lot of experience, especially in this subject area, but ultimately when it comes to content issues there is no difference between an admin, an experienced editor like me and a complete newcomer: we are all equal. Hope this helps. - Sitush (talk) 15:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Please follow the thread of the discussion before reverting changes. Its not a good practice to revert just because you can do it so 'cause it just creates a mess of things. Its always best to follow talk pages(both article and user's). Merkcid (talk) 18:49, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

General Sanctions

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

—SpacemanSpiff 19:12, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pallava dynasty, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Telugu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:38, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Reddy, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:41, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Varna (Hinduism). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 19:11, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vellalar doesnt mean water or shower water it means Spear

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Vel_(film) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.54.80.216 (talk) 20:38, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sangitha rani111. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sanctions

Since you are once again making poor contributions to caste-related articles, please note the alert that was given to you in 2015, which is still on this page, and also the following information. - Sitush (talk) 08:45, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Amazing abilities!

Verifying information doesn't exist in a book which is not online in seconds. Jim1138 (talk) 09:19, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sangitha rani111. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mukkulathor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kallar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanction reminder

Since it's been over an year since you were last informed of these prevailing sanctions in your area of editing, I am reminding you of them again.

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

In particular, the Mukkulathor article is under active arbitration remedies and "only accounts older than 30 days and with at least 500 edits" are allowed to edit the article itself; so for now please restrict your edits to the article's talkpage. Abecedare (talk) 04:23, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018

Hello, I'm DVdm. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Mediterranean Sea, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 18:09, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khagan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Persian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Hamburg, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 07:43, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Use of "a" v. "an"

Suggest reading EnglishPage.com A vs. An. Or, try searching for "a an". Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:08, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 07:09, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sangitha rani111. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pannaiyar Caste, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Group (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Evading discussion

Hi! Your recent activity doesn't seems to be constructive. You have deleted this discussion [[1]] without any proper reply. This is about your long term behavior in Wikipedia and evading discussion and deleting discussion seems to be, your not here to build Wikipedia. As mentioned earlier the next step will be Administrator intervention if you fail to respond properly. Thank you.--Universalrahu (talk) 08:07, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You need to check the amount of discussion I have made in talk pages. I kindly request you to go through talk pages, Also when ever I make a edit it based on university academic books and resources. so Please I have posted my comments on talk pages. request you to do the same.

In lack of proper response from you the issue have been sent to the notice of Administrator's please check for more details. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. --Universalrahu (talk) 07:50, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 03:18, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sangitha rani111 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I live close to a library whose free internet I use, Not sure why I am considered a puppet, I am not even involved in these discussions, please unblock me, there is a mistake here, I have never violated any wiki policy, please check this link https://www.cwu.edu/community-wi-fi-program-provides-free-internet-access-everyone Sangitha rani111 (talk) 04:00, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As per below, this does not address the overlap in edits (nor does it properly address the technical evidence). Yamla (talk) 10:14, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Interesting that all recent edits from this Central Washington University free internet you state you are using have been to Indian caste articles, including making the same arguments at Agnivansha by Vinitasimhan and yourself.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 04:12, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is large community that uses that internet, wide variety of people, I humbly request you to reconsider this blockSangitha rani111 (talk) 04:16, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Sangitha rani111[reply]

A large community with a wide variety of people would expect to have a wide variety of interests, not a limited number of edits in the same topic area supporting each other's views.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 04:21, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its just a coincidence and a misunderstanding, there is a large Indian community who share the same internet , please do not block me, I have done nothing worngSangitha rani111 (talk) 04:35, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Sangitha rani111[reply]