User talk:Samoht99

Welcome!

Hello, Samoht99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Viewratio (talk) 22:41, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, I'm ToBeFree. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Toy Story 4, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 16:23, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Return to Sleepaway Camp, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm Chip3004 Please Don't bother changing the title to this Article Untitled Spider-Man: Far From Home sequel because The Director Jon Watts or Sony has not announced the official title for Untitled Spider-Man: Far From Home sequel, Until Jon Watts or Sony Announces the official title for the movie, Do not change it or revert any editor's Edit and Make sure you include a ref or it will be reverted. Chip3004 (talk) 16:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Zack Snyder's Justice League. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated unconstructive edits may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ภץאคгöร 18:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. ภץאคгöร 18:16, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Zack Snyder's Justice League. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. – wallyfromdilbert (talk) 00:50, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tobey Maguire filmography

Can you please do me a favor and wait until the Official Trailer For Spider-Man No Way Home to come before adding Spider-Man: No Way Home to Tobey Maguire filmography, Sony is still hiding Tobey Maguire's involvement in Spider-Man No Way Home. Thank You Chip3004 (talk) 22:56, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Hello, I'm JPxG. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Willie Garson, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jp×g 23:29, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Timothée Chalamet Wonka.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Timothée Chalamet Wonka.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 22:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Timothée Chalamet Wonka.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Timothée Chalamet Wonka.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eternals (film). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Triosdeity (talk) 02:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Eternals (film), you may be blocked from editing. Triosdeity (talk) 06:24, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Spider-Man: No Way Home, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- LuK3 (Talk) 19:23, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Doug Weller talk 16:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samoht99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was just attempting to add proper sources. I don't understand what I did wrong. Samoht99 (talk) 16:55, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you don't understand what you did wrong, there are no grounds to consider lifting your block. Yamla (talk) 10:42, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samoht99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for doing unnecessary edits that weren't factually correct at time. I apologize for this. I didn't mean any harm and I now understand what I did wrong Samoht99 (talk) 18:43, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
Read our guide to improving articles.
Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
  - do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
  - do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
  - do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
  - do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
- If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 19:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What sort of edits do you intend to make if we were to unblock you? SQL ^{Query Me!} 21:57, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd mainly update pages on films as more information comes out on them. Otherwise, I'd just be a lurker reading the pages Samoht99 (talk) 23:26, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You already have an open unblock request above. I have removed the unblock formatting from this comment. SQL ^{Query Me!} 23:29, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that! So, will you take my request into account? Again, so sorry for causing harm. I didn't mean it like that.

I understand why I was blocked now and I just wish to help contribute to Wiki in the future. Is there any chance for an unblock? Samoht99 (talk) 15:33, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]