Jump to content

User talk:Samkange

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Samkange, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Empty Buffer (talk) 13:15, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Rhsclogo.png

[edit]

Hello, Samkange!

It was really helpful of you to you to upload File:Rhsclogo.png. However, we need to properly format the image license information in order to keep and use new images.

If you can edit the description and add one of these templates, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:07, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rhsclogo.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rhsclogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Samkange, I got your message about the Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition page. What will help the most to improve the article and ensure it is inline with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines is to add more reliable secondary sources. Right now it seems like the only sources are from the organization's website. The secondary sources are needed to establish notability. Make sure that the content and tone are not promoting the organization but rather, describing the significant aspects of it with a neutral point of view. I hope this helps. Best of luck to you and let me know if you have any more questions. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 02:03, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't have to contact me about it (but I don't mind at all); if you fix the problems then there's no problem with you removing the tags. You added more to the references so you can definitely remove the 'bare urls' tag. Although you could still improve the citations by using the cite web template. It's easier though to just click 'Cite' on the editing toolbar while you're editing and choose 'cite web' from the dropdown menu. It gives you a box to fill in all of the categories like title, url, publisher, author, access date, etc.
As for the advertising tag, just do your best to make sure the article is written like an encyclopedia entry and not the website for the organization. It should be stating significant information about the organization that is represented in reliable sources with a neutral point of view. If you think it does that, then feel free to remove the tag. AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 08:19, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Rhsclogo.png)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Rhsclogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:RHSC logo 2012.jpg

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RHSC logo 2012.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Noah Howard, Alt Sax.jpg listed for discussion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Noah Howard, Alt Sax.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Deadstar (talk) 15:40, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for your reply in regards to this image. In a nutshell: The copyright for any photograph lies with the person that took it, unless it is a specific "work-for-hire", where a photographer is paid to take photos but the copyright is with the person giving them the job. Perhaps you know which it is in this case.
If the photographer owns the copyright, they need to send an email
If Noah owned the copyright, the copyrights will have moved onto an heir, and they will need to send an email.
A template and more information can be found here (section:Declaration of consent for all enquiries), where you just need to fill in the blanks. If you need help, I can assist, just let me know. In the process I am also moving it to commons.wikimedia.org - this is where all the free files are kept. It makes it possible for people on other language wikis to use the image too. Hope that helps & it will get sorted. Thanks Deadstar (talk) 08:47, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]