User talk:Deadstar

Note to self

{{subst:ncd}} for images moved to commons.

First message

Hello and Welcome! I hope you like the place. --mav

Hi. I just noticed that you started Famous Irish people see List of famous Irish people. They need merging. Mintguy

I just noticed that as well. I suggest we keep the Famous Irish people one, as that one is linked from a different/international list of 'famous people'?

List of famous Irish people has more of an edit history, I've redirected Famous Irish people to this page. Mintguy

OK

Howth

Today I moved the dot for Howth from the Sutton location to a more accurate location for Howth on the template. ww2censor 03:23, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately I don't have access to my Irish OS maps (nearly a full set of old half inch maps) but I knew where Howth is, so by trial and error fixed it. I would like to put more templates into Irish towns but getting the correct OS longitude and latitude co-ordinates is quite difficult and time consuming. I used Multimap to find a town and then read to co-ordinates from that when i recenter the map on the town. Do you want to help (if you have access to maps - mine are in Ireland and I am in the US now)? Cheers ww2censor 14:47, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: renaming images

Hey, thanks for the reply, after I posted the question, I found the same answer somewhere else after some intense searching. But thanks for answering nonetheless. Cheers! Murderbike 10:18, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Karte_Paretz.jpg

Hi. The only reason I can see that I marked it redundant might be because there must have been a .png version of the same image. When I was working on that article .jpg pretty much went out of style for maps and such. Not sure what happened to the .png image though. It should probably be converted and then replaced. Mmounties (Talk) 22:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bertrand Meyer image

Hi! I see you added the picture back to Bertrand Meyer -- I thought about doing that myself, but I saw this edit and decided not to. Do you think the image is important enough for the article to justify going against his wishes? I don't know, really. I just want to make sure you saw his edit and thought about it. :) Dreamyshade 07:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I'm not sure, and I don't know of any relevant guidelines. Want to bring it up on the Village Pump? Dreamyshade 05:48, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Sherrod

Hey! Thanks for those images. I'll definitely use the Sherrod one. The Neil Finn one's already in use on his page. If you're interested, there's a Crowded House (and Split Enz, Neil Finn etc) WikiProject and you're more than welcome to sign up. --linca ^linca 12:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I did see that. Quite amusing, but certainly not encyclopedic or displaying a neutral point of view. You've basically stripped the guts of my crystal and mos issues out ot if, but I'm still adamant they fail notability. Welcome to WT:CROWDIES! --linca ^linca 13:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Crowded House

Hi! A discussion has begun at WikiProject Crowded House's talk page regarding the future and goals of the WikiProject. Please feel free to contribute to this discussion in any way you see as being positive. --linca ^linca 10:12, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Caroline Kennedy (singer)

Another editor has added the {{prod}} template to the article Caroline Kennedy (singer), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 06:59, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

St. Patrick photo on Slate

Slate is using your photo without crediting you. They just say "courtesy Wikipedia". I'd complain to them if I were you.—Chowbok ☠ 20:13, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re:Eliphas Levi

Done (more at my talk page) -Andrew c ^[talk] 15:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedians in Ireland email list.

Hello Deadstar:

I'm pleased to announce that we've started a new Ireland Wikimedian email list, that you can join, at mail:WikimediaIE. For Wikimedians in Ireland and Wikimedians interested in events in Ireland and efforts in Ireland. It's there to to discuss meetups, partnerships with Museums and National Archives, and anything else where Wikipedia and real life intersect :) --Bastique ^demandez 17:05, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Larrys Creek

Hi, thanks for the heads up. Although the name had an apostrophe in the 19th century, and some highway signs still spell it that way, the official spelling is Larrys Creek. See this USGS GNIS page. So if you could, please make the official category / name on Commons without an apostrophe. Thanks, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 17:17, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 20:57, 26 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Deadstar. You have new messages at Acather96's talk page.
Message added 06:38, 11 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Proposed deletion of Caroline Kennedy-McCracken

The article Caroline Kennedy-McCracken has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to satisfy WP:BIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Terence7 (talk) 00:55, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Big Foot / Spotted Elk

If anyone came here wondering why I removed the images of "Big Foot" from the pages regarding Massacre at Wounded Knee and Spotted Elk, the photo is of a different Big Foot, from the Oglala tribe. For more about the Big Foots in question: here 1, 2 and 3. :See also the note on Talk:Spotted Elk regarding a removed paragraph about the photograph. Deadstar (talk) 09:51, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Message on my talkpage

Anette and Annette are different spellings, used in different languages. That's why I reverted it. --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 13:28, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[[Image patrol]

If you have TWINKLE installed you can send images to PUF/FFD directly without having to Do Not Commons them.

Also http://tools.wmflabs.org/catscan2/catscan2.php?categories=All+free+media&negcats=Self-published+work%0D%0AFreely+licensed+images+of+non-free+subject&ns[6]=1&templates_no=Copy+to+Wikimedia+Commons%0D%0Anow+Commons%0D%0A%3C!--Already+has+information+--%3E%0D%0AInformation%0D%0AGoogle+Art+Project%0D%0A%3C!--+Blocks+on+Commons+Transfer--%3E%0D%0ANon-free+use+rationale%0D%0ANon-free+use+rationale+2%0D%0APD-ineligible-USonly%0D%0ASplit+media%0D%0A%3C!--Shouldn%27t+be+moved--%3E%0D%0Aprotected+generic+image+name%0D%0AKeep+local%0D%0Aesoteric+file%0D%0Auserspace+file%0D%0A%3C!--In+process.--%3E%0D%0Apuf%0D%0Affd%0D%0ANFUR+not+needed&sortby=uploaddate&ext_image_data=1&file_usage_data=1

May be of interest. Most of these are getting on for having been uuploaded 9-10 years ago, and some curation would be appreciated. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:09, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for your help tidying up after my do-not-move-to-commons. I am not 100% certain on what is allowed on en: - more familiar with what is needed for it to go to COM! My browser doesn't support Twinkle unfortunately (and I can't upgrade/change browser either :(). I'll have a look at that catscan thing. Deadstar (talk) 15:33, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See also - Special:Contributions/Sfan00_IMG especially the edit summaries that indicate information was added,

Also you may wish to use Special:ListFiles for a specifc username - https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Special%3AListFiles&limit=500&user=J.N.+Houterman for example. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:55, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Uploads of dedicated photographs

Reference: message sent to me regarding the Dedicated Classical Pianist Photographs added to artists sites. These are photos the various artists possess and distribute for publicity purposes, inclusion in programs and any newspaper articles or concert reviews they might receive. Some photos might have been taken by my father, but certainly not most. I was under the impression that when a dedication is made to a party, they are then the owners of said document and can do what they will with it! I feel that they are quite illuminating on a musicians wiki site as they give some insight into their touring, sometimes the number of places where they performed, and frequently their popularity and extra requests to tour again. Please advise me what further steps I can take to satisfy the copyright, as it would be a shame to delete. Aldercraft (talk) 14:20, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	Move to Commons Barnstar
	Moving files from En.Wikipedia to Commons is a tedious task. For your hard work in moving quality images to Commons and for your long term dedication to the project, I hereby award you this Move to Commons Barnstar. Thanks for your work and keep it up! TLSuda (talk) 18:25, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No need, but thank you all the same :) Deadstar (talk) 08:22, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[PJ Brooke picture]

Not sure what you require in the way of confirmation that this image is CC-BY-SA. The image was sent to me by PJ Brooke, I communicated with the photographer and got permission to use it under that licence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JonFairbairn (talk • contribs) 15:47, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lin Li (the photographer) has now sent an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JonFairbairn (talk • contribs) 15:34, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:PA230060.JPG

I do not believe these toys are copyright protected. They themselves are not marked, nor was the packaging that they came in. Historically, poses of toy figures such as these were shamelessly copied by other companies, and I don't believe this would have been possible if they had been copyright protected. I suggest not deleted these or any other images of toy soldiers until the situation can be clarified. Thank you. Jcbutler (talk) 17:48, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback. Deadstar (talk) 10:31, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bazaar57fn.jpg

The 1957 copyright was originally held by Taffy's of California but was never renewed and fell into the public domain after 28 yrs. The image is now in the public domain and Taffy's of California no longer exists. Schmausschmaus (talk)

Hi, and thanks for your comment. The 1957 copyright of the magazine was renewed, this is what I was going on. I will add your note on the discussion (if you have not done so already) as it could help figure out what license applies. It would be great if it was free - it could be moved to Commons if it was. Kind regards, Deadstar (talk) 13:48, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

One last comment. The page and image are not from Harper's Bazaar strictly speaking. They were promotional flyers for Taffy's after Taffy's had commissioned the photo. Harper's Bazaar subsequently published the photo and text ("featured editorially in Harper's Bazaar") but with Taffy's permission. The photo and text belonged to Taffy's.Schmausschmaus (talk)

I added your comment to the entry Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 July 7 on this page & pinged you from there. Thanks for your help. Deadstar (talk) 08:51, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When I was working on the article I had access to archive materials. The image is a Taffy's of California flyer; it is not from a magazine. Harper's Bazaar did later publish the cotton in the evening image as a bonus for the full page ad. The full page ad Taffyhbfn.jpg in those days cost $5,500, about $50,000 in today's money. Taffy's then sent the cotton in the evening image and text, which they owned, to the magazine which included it in their content gratis. That was the way fashion mags worked in those days. Schmausschmaus (talk)

File:Taffyhbfn.jpg

Again, Taffy's of California commissioned and owned the 1956 image and used it in their sales campaign. It is a full page ad in Harper's Bazaar, which Taffy's paid for, not editorial material. Harper's Bazaar reciprocated by running Bazaar57fn.jpg, an image also owned by Taffy's. That was the way fashion mags worked in those days. Taffy's went out of business in 1958, and did not renew the copyright on Taffyhbfn.jpg or Bazaar57fn.jpg after 28 years. Taffyhbfn.jpg, originally an ad, is now public domain. Schmausschmaus (talk)

Great, thanks for that. I've added it to the review page. I'd say we're ok to keep this with the license as you have supplied. Deadstar (talk) 15:13, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FFD

A bunch of your files for deletion entries look like they might have been better tagged as {{no permission}} if the author appears to be different from the uploader. Saves a little bureaucracy, unless there was some reason you don't use that, {{no source}}, etc. – czar 04:42, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Takis.JPG

Thanks you for observing that this image has been replaced and it is no longer required. We need an administrator to delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Futuristas (talk • contribs) 17:25, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Van Epperson Photo

I am not a computer person and do not understand the technical aspects of Wikipedia.

I am an actor named Van Epperson.

You have marked my personal photo/headshot on my Wikipedia listing for deletion, apparently because I listed the name of my friend who took it as the photographer. You have claimed it is does not show proper copyright permission for public distribution. This is my own personal photo. No one owns it but me and I have the right to list my friend's name who took the photo for me. I believe I put it up with full permission for anyone to use it -- and no one can do that but me -- I own the photo -- it is of me, taken with my own camera by my friend Christopher Anderson. It is a headshot I use professionally. It is all over the web on lots of different websites because I posted it myself. It is publicly displayed in multiple places for anyone to see and use.

If an actor cannot post his own photo that he owns without someone like you marking it for deletion over some made up incorrect assumption that has no basis whatsoever in truth or reality, that really sux.

Please remove whatever you have done to mark my photo of myself for deletion and allow it to remain on my Wikipedia listing. Yes, anyone can use it. It is a public photo. That is why I posted it. Again, it is a photo of ME, that was taken by my friend Christopher Anderson at my request. He is not a professional photographer, he is just my friend. He does not own the photo, I do. He has nothing whatsoever to do with it other than taking it for me, again, at MY REQUEST.

I am completely offended that you have marked my photo for deletion when it is a photo of me, taken at my request, posted on Wikipedia by me. If the permission/copyright needs amendment, I do NOT know how to do that. I attempted to understand the Wikipedia instructions connected to your unwarranted attacking of my photo by marking it for deletion but I did not comprehend them.

Again, please remove whatever you have done to mark my photo for "possible deletion". I would appreciate hearing back from you regarding this so I know my photo will not be removed over your unfounded assumptions. Please write me back on my page, so I will get the message like I got this one or I will never see it.Yeswolf (talk) 17:29, 8 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yeswolf (talk • contribs) 17:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Noah Howard Photo

Hi, not sure if this is the right place for my reply regarding your copyright concern. Apologies if not. I am not clear what your issue is with the photo; copyright is with Noah Howard on whose behalf I added the pic. Happy to answer your questions and clarify this. Best, Samkange — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samkange (talk • contribs) 17:43, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Twinkle is broken

See Special:Diff/714701730, Special:Diff/714719715 and WT:FFD#Twinkle bug. If you wish to list a file on FFD before it's fixed, remember to restore the other requests on the page after listing the file. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:09, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - thanks for the note & fixing, didn't notice (obviously)... Deadstar (talk)

Is it just me though? Deadstar (talk) 14:00, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Several users have cleared the page today, see the page history. When you cleared the page, I discovered that I had cleared the page myself when listing another file a bit earlier. I think that I found all of the missing requests and readded them. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:17, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

John Safer -Deleted Pictures

Hi, The permissions for both pictures (Quest-Foundry.jpg, Quest-at Hopkins.jpg) were emailed after the first note was added to the article. Can you please check and revert the changes? The permissions were emailed as per Wikipedia instructions.

Thank you for your time!!Pilot03 (talk) 02:14, 30 April 2016 (UTC)Pilot03[reply]

FYI

I did have OTRS permission. I was literally an OTRS volunteer.

WP:Possibly_unfree_files/2016_March_29#File:Ohsc8.gif

hmwith☮ 02:24, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

`

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Deadstar. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

William Alexander Young Memorial

The memorial to Young and Noguchi is in the grounds of Korle Bu Hospital, Accra. I've sent a query to the hospital to double check it's still there. it was, last time I spoke to them. The original photograph of the memorial is in my archive, as are all other photographs on this page. Copyright is owned by Young's grandson, Nicholas Jones, who co-operated in writing this article. Bethbs (talk) 10:45, 3 April 2020 (UTC)Bethbs[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]