User talk:Sam-2727/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Sam-2727. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Hey, Sam-2727! I'm afraid I need a lot more detail on how you decided there was consensus for this close, as I don't see it at all. —valereee (talk) 10:33, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Valereee, this was my reasoning: after The talk (African-American parenting) was proposed, an initial opposer (and the initial proposer), supported that idea, presumably (based on later comments and refutations), that it was recognizable to non-experts, while used in reliable sources. You opposed on the basis that not all black homes identify as African American. This was refuted later on by Rreagan007, Bus stop, and Trekker on the basis that the terms are used interchangeably and, more generally, that the article currently is limited in scope to the United States. Rreagan007 indicates that these are commonly used interchangably anyway by pointing to the African-American Wikipedia article. Although trekker also supports the move to African-American parenting, echoing the limited in scope to the united States, they say that they would more strongly support the article being changed to (racism). But this argument was based off of the hypothetical "while I'm sure tons of other minorities in America (and other places) also have this kind of talk" (the arguement essentially echoed verbatim by Bowler the Carmine), while not actually presenting evidence or attempting to refute the claim by others that the scope of the article is the United States. This is in contrast to the arguments for African-American parenting, which were based off of policy (i.e. recognizable and used in reliable sources, as well as being connected to the current scope of the article).
With regards to "The talk (racism in the United States)," bus stop opposes based on the current scope of the article, which is limited to African American parenting. This argument was reflected in other "scope" arguments by other users when defending The talk (African-American parenting).
tldr; when arguing scope/use vs. hypotheticals, scope is a policy based argument.
Hopefully this explains my reasoning. I did spend a lot of time reading all of the arguments. I'm happy to explain more in detail, or be persuaded that my reasoning was flawed. Sam-2727 (talk) 18:10, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- I think we probably need to revert the closure. It's a very complex, contentious close and probably need an experienced admin closer. —valereee (talk) 18:14, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Valereee, If you would appreciate the opinion of an experienced admin, I will do that. Can you perform the round-robin move to override the redirect? I'm not a page mover so can't do that. Sam-2727 (talk) 18:18, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Reverted back to old version. Just needs to be moved back now. Sam-2727 (talk) 18:22, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sam-2727, oh, sorry, ec. Let me go see what's up! —valereee (talk) 18:23, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sam-2727, I don't want to do that since I'm really way too heavily involved (I created the article in the first place), but if you ask at Wikipedia:Requested moves, someone will eventually appear. :) —valereee (talk) 18:23, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Valereee, added Sam-2727 (talk) 18:31, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sam-2727, no worries about the fact it's still at the new move, it can stay there for the time being. :) It's fine if it parks there for a while. :) —valereee (talk) 18:42, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Valereee, Yes, and since you want an admin to perform the close, they'll be able to either perform the move back and/or keep it based off of the outcome anyway even if it's still there. Sam-2727 (talk) 18:44, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Totally, no worries. It's silly to move it again now, since it could easily end up where it is right now again after another closure. There's zero urgency to get it to the "correct" title. :) —valereee (talk) 18:55, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Valereee, Yes, and since you want an admin to perform the close, they'll be able to either perform the move back and/or keep it based off of the outcome anyway even if it's still there. Sam-2727 (talk) 18:44, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Sam-2727, no worries about the fact it's still at the new move, it can stay there for the time being. :) It's fine if it parks there for a while. :) —valereee (talk) 18:42, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Valereee, added Sam-2727 (talk) 18:31, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Reverted back to old version. Just needs to be moved back now. Sam-2727 (talk) 18:22, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
- Valereee, If you would appreciate the opinion of an experienced admin, I will do that. Can you perform the round-robin move to override the redirect? I'm not a page mover so can't do that. Sam-2727 (talk) 18:18, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Page moves
Please do not rename pages while there is still an open, ongoing discussion on the talk page, as you did at The talk (racism in the US). The discussion should be completed and the move request closed before any such action is taken. The page move has been reverted. Thank you for your willingness to help, but please familiarize yourself with policies and guidelines in regard to page moves. P.I. Ellsworth ed. put'r there 20:50, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Just noticed your discussion with Valereee above, so that explains what happened. Have a good day! P.I. Ellsworth ed. put'r there 20:53, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
Jane Hogarth
Thanks for your comment on the Jane Hogarth talk page. I've not had this issue before. I'm not going to touch it in case somehow I did violate anything. I'll let TPTB decide. But it is reassuring to have a comment there suggesting I did not. ☕ Antiqueight chatter 13:30, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- Antiqueight, Personally I don't think you did violate anything. But there was a complaint in OTRS about it, and some other people advised me to put the notice out of an abundance of caution. Sam-2727 (talk) 14:48, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
- The anon IP who complained has been templated for disruptive editing. I’m going to take the rest of the issue to talk at the page. Montanabw(talk) 15:31, 29 July 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – August 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2020).
Administrator changes
Oversight changes
Guideline and policy news
- There is an open request for comment to decide whether to increase the minimum duration a sanction discussion has to remain open (currently 24 hours).
- Speedy deletion criterion T2 (template that misrepresents established policy) has been repealed following a request for comment.
- Speedy deletion criterion X2 (pages created by the content translation tool) has been repealed following a discussion.
- There is a proposal to restrict proposed deletion to confirmed users.
Test edit request
 | This article isn't protected, so you should be able to edit it yourself. If you are still having problems editing it, please ask for advice at WP:TEAHOUSE. |
- What I think should be changed: Change Y to X please
- Why it should be changed: Because it would be cool
- References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button): [1][2]
Sam-2727 (talk) 00:05, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Example Domain". example.com. Retrieved 2020-08-06.
- ^ "Wikipedia". www.wikipedia.org. Retrieved 2020-08-06.
Virgotyphlops braminus
Please see my comments at Talk:Virgotyphlops braminus and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles#Virgotyphlops braminus. (I have no expertise in the taxonomy of reptiles, I merely maintain taxoboxes.) Peter coxhead (talk) 09:52, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
YGM
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Notes to self
- lack of notability: Eric Agol Sam-2727 (talk) 05:12, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- lack of notability: Cosmic Dawn Center. Sam-2727 (talk) 05:29, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Kj cheetham. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Gihan Kamel, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Kj cheetham (talk) 09:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2020).
Administrator changes
CheckUser changes
Guideline and policy news
- Following a request for comment, the minimum length for site ban discussions was increased to 72 hours, up from 24.
- A request for comment is ongoing to determine whether paid editors
must
orshould
use the articles for creation process. - A request for comment is open to resolve inconsistencies between the draftification and alternative to deletion processes.
Arbitration
- A request for comment is open to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the 2020 English Wikipedia Arbitration Committee election and to resolve any issues not covered by existing rules.
- An open request for comment asks whether active Arbitrators may serve on the Trust and Safety Case Review Committee or Ombudsman commission.
Reviewing and approving article page for Henry Gayden
Hi Sam-2727. Hope all is well. I wanted to bring this query to your attention. I recently created an article page for Henry Gayden. Would you mind reviewing the page for approval? If you can do it, that would be much appreciated. Thanks. Elainasla (talk) 10:47, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Elainasla, sure, I'll review it in a few hours. Sam-2727 (talk) 23:15, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
I apologize for the delayed response. Thanks for that, I appreciate your assistance. Elainasla (talk) 06:25, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
The Scream 5 page should be moved to Untitled Scream sequel or Scream (2022) (film)
Hi @Sam-2727:. Hope all is well. I wanted to bring another query to your attention. According to Paramount Pictures[1], the title of this movie hasn't actually been confirmed as Scream 5. It appears that certain media outlets are making that assumption, even though the recent teaser on the official Scream Twitter account[2] did not show a numbered Scream title. What lends more credence to the above statement is that the directors involved have not connected this project and referred to it as Scream 5 either. Additionally, Variety noted that Spyglass Media Group and Paramount are labeling this movie as a "relaunch" of the series.[3] I find this case to be similar to what Universal Pictures, Blumhouse Productions and Miramax did to Halloween (2018 film) in that front. In light of such evidence, I suggest the idea of re-titling the aforementioned article page to either Untitled Scream sequel or Scream (2022), to accommodate the change. Elainasla (talk) 06:28, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
References
- ^ Verhoeven, Beatrice (June 24, 2020). "Paramount to Partner With Spyglass on Relaunch of 'Scream'". The Wrap. Retrieved September 23, 2020.
- ^ Scream [@ScreamMovies] (August 29, 2020). "On January 14, 2022… We're going to hear you SCREAM" (Tweet). Retrieved September 23, 2020 – via Twitter.
- ^ Vary, Adam (September 10, 2020). "Neve Campbell Returning to 'Scream' Franchise as Sidney Prescott". Variety. Retrieved September 23, 2020.
OTRS queue
Just out of curiosity, with that request for deletion on OTRS, which queue is that in? For some reason it's saying I don't have permission to view it, but I have permissions for pretty much every enwiki queue. Thanks. Primefac (talk) 17:38, 25 September 2020 (UTC) (please ping on reply)
- Primefac, I don't either now for some reason. I or someone else must've accidentally moved it. Will ask administrators to move it back. Sam-2727 (talk) 18:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Primefac, it turns out I accidentally entered the ticket number vs. the number in the url. The link at the AfD discussion should work now. Sam-2727 (talk) 18:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, yes. If you're going to link to a ticket using the actual number, use
[[:ticket:####...]]. Didn't notice you were using a different method. Primefac (talk) 18:44, 25 September 2020 (UTC)- Primefac, Will keep that in mind for the future. Thanks for letting me know. I think I've always used the "ticket" interwiki link previously. I don't know why I didn't this time around. Sam-2727 (talk) 18:54, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, yes. If you're going to link to a ticket using the actual number, use
- Primefac, it turns out I accidentally entered the ticket number vs. the number in the url. The link at the AfD discussion should work now. Sam-2727 (talk) 18:35, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2020).
Administrator changes
Ajpolino • LuK3
Jackmcbarn
Ad Orientem • Harej • Lid • Lomn • Mentoz86 • Oliver Pereira • XJaM
There'sNoTime → TheresNoTime
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
1) if the result of a deletion discussion is to draftify; or 2) if the article is newly created
.
- A request for comment found consensus that incubation as an alternative to deletion should generally only be recommended when draftification is appropriate, namely
Technical news
- The filter log now provides links to view diffs of deleted revisions (phab:T261630).
Arbitration
- The 2020 CheckUser and Oversight appointment process has begun. The community consultation period will take place from September 27th to October 7th.
- Following a request for comment, sitting Committee members may not serve on either the Ombuds Commission or the WMF Case Review Committee. The Arbitration Committee passed a motion implementing those results into their procedures.
Miscellaneous
- The Universal Code of Conduct draft is open for community review and comment until October 6th, 2020.
- Office actions may now be appealed to the Interim Trust & Safety Case Review Committee.
Administrators' newsletter – November 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
any article on a beauty pageant, or biography of a person known as a beauty pageant contestant, which has been edited by a sockpuppet account or logged-out sockpuppet
, to be logged at WP:GS/PAGEANT.
- Community sanctions now authorize administrators to place under indefinite semiprotection
Technical news
- Sysops will once again be able to view the deleted history of JS/CSS pages; this was restricted to interface administrators when that group was introduced.
- Twinkle's block module now includes the ability to note the specific case when applying a discretionary sanctions block and/or template.
- Sysops will be able to use Special:CreateLocalAccount to create a local account for a global user that is prevented from auto-creation locally (such as by a filter or range block). Administrators that are not sure if such a creation is appropriate should contact a checkuser.
Arbitration
- The 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections process has begun. Eligible editors will be able to nominate themselves as candidates from November 8 through November 17. The voting period will run from November 23 through December 6.
- The Anti-harassment RfC has concluded with a summary of the feedback provided.
Miscellaneous
- A reminder that
standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people.
(American Politics 2 Arbitration case).
- A reminder that
We can improve more articles!
Hello & Привет! I have written a few other biographical articles also, but they are not so long like Stephen Fuchs, because I could not find enough study material online to build larger content on them. Also, I will create some more articles, but they wouldn't also be so long. Still, if you would like to help in improving the articles, that would be much appreciated )) Would you like to do that? Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 07:10, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Мастер Шторм, that sounds great. I'd be glad to help improve more articles you create. I'm personally not very knowledgable in anthropology (the subject you seem to edit the most), but I've found it very interesting to read about people and ideas in the anthropology field. Sam-2727 (talk) 23:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
- Sam-2727, thanks for the positive response )) I will start pinging you on the talk pages, article after article. And yes, anthropology is a very interesting topic. It's good to see that you are enjoying working/editing on this topic )) For now, I am only writing about the anthropologists, but with time, I will try to write more and more about the anthropologists' works also on the articles related to the subject. Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 04:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- Hello! Once we are done with the final touch (for now, only one last thing is left to be addressed) at Stephen Fuchs, I would be looking forward to your comments/suggestions for improvements at Indera Paul Singh, and working together to improve the article. Let's just keep going, article after article )) Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 09:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sam, I have listed the article started by me at Мастер Шторм. So, if there is any article in particular that you would like to start with, then your are welcome to do so. In fact, you can chose the order of all the articles yourself on which we would work together. Simply ping me at the articles' talk pages, one by one )) Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 13:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Мастер Шторм, great sounds good. I think I'll look at Natalya Romanovna Guseva next (starting tomorrow). Just a warning that I will be reviewing things at a slower pace from now until december because I am busy in real life, but should be able to do more after that. Sam-2727 (talk) 04:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- OK )) Warning well received and understood )) Thanks,
Мастер Шторм (talk) 05:07, 6 September 2020 (UTC)NitinMlk, you are also welcome to leave feedback about any article(s) for further improvements as you have always guided me well on editing more productively and fruitfully )) Some of the pages on which I have Sam have worked together have significantly benefited from the scholarly reviews suggested by you. Thanks for everything, Мастер Шторм (talk) 05:56, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sam, I thought that the warning said that you will be reviewing things at a slower pace
but I haven't heard from you for a few days now )) Anyways, I just wanted to say that you may review them at your own pace, as per your own comfort. I will simply keep on adding more articles, and would follow up with you once you ping me on any article's page )) And, it would be completely fine by me even if that would take me a few days or a couple of weeks to have the first ping from you )) So, there is no hurry )) Thanks for everything, Мастер Шторм (talk) 11:34, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Мастер Шторм, sorry I forgot to ping you but I left some comments here: Talk:Natalya Romanovna Guseva. Sam-2727 (talk) 21:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, Sam )) I will work on your suggestions tomorrow )) Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 02:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, Sam. I hope that everything in your life is going great and you are in good health )) I can see that you are, as you said earlier, giving lesser time to Wikipedia. I just wanted to say that kindly don't forget about me )) And, when you start giving more time, like earlier, to Wikipedia, then please make sure to ping me )) I want us to work together on lots of articles Soft and warm bear hugs to you )) Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 11:21, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- Мастер Шторм, Thank you for your kind words. I look forward to getting back on Wikipedia, and expect to still do so at the beginning of December, when I will be able to work on articles with you again. Sam-2727 (talk) 14:01, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- Hello, Sam. I hope that everything in your life is going great and you are in good health )) I can see that you are, as you said earlier, giving lesser time to Wikipedia. I just wanted to say that kindly don't forget about me )) And, when you start giving more time, like earlier, to Wikipedia, then please make sure to ping me )) I want us to work together on lots of articles
- Thanks, Sam )) I will work on your suggestions tomorrow )) Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 02:45, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- Мастер Шторм, sorry I forgot to ping you but I left some comments here: Talk:Natalya Romanovna Guseva. Sam-2727 (talk) 21:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sam, I thought that the warning said that you will be reviewing things at a slower pace
- OK )) Warning well received and understood )) Thanks,
- Мастер Шторм, great sounds good. I think I'll look at Natalya Romanovna Guseva next (starting tomorrow). Just a warning that I will be reviewing things at a slower pace from now until december because I am busy in real life, but should be able to do more after that. Sam-2727 (talk) 04:48, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sam, I have listed the article started by me at Мастер Шторм. So, if there is any article in particular that you would like to start with, then your are welcome to do so. In fact, you can chose the order of all the articles yourself on which we would work together. Simply ping me at the articles' talk pages, one by one )) Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 13:54, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Hello! Once we are done with the final touch (for now, only one last thing is left to be addressed) at Stephen Fuchs, I would be looking forward to your comments/suggestions for improvements at Indera Paul Singh, and working together to improve the article. Let's just keep going, article after article )) Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 09:46, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Sam-2727, thanks for the positive response )) I will start pinging you on the talk pages, article after article. And yes, anthropology is a very interesting topic. It's good to see that you are enjoying working/editing on this topic )) For now, I am only writing about the anthropologists, but with time, I will try to write more and more about the anthropologists' works also on the articles related to the subject. Thanks, Мастер Шторм (talk) 04:13, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Stephen Fuchs
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stephen Fuchs you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Right cite -- Right cite (talk) 20:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Special Barnstar |
| Great job with the good article work on Aparna Rao! Thank you for helping out over there! Good job with the high quality contributions to Wikipedia! Right cite (talk) 20:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC) |
Aparna Rao for peer review and or guild of copy editors
Strongly recommend for future improvements post good article you can take the Aparna Rao article for both peer review and or guild of copyeditors, you can even do guild of copyeditors as part of the peer review process while that's ongoing.
Instructions at:
Good luck, Right cite (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi Sam-2727! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 01:33, Monday, February 22, 2021 (UTC)
| Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
| Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
A barnstar for you!
|
The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar |
| Thank you, Sam, for your kind words about my work to improve the article Aroused (film) from stub to Good Article. Much appreciated! Right cite (talk) 02:05, 22 November 2020 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Administrators' newsletter – December 2020
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2020).
Administrator changes
- Andrwsc • Anetode • GoldenRing • JzG • LinguistAtLarge • Nehrams2020
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- There is a request for comment in progress to either remove T3 (duplicated and hardcoded instances) as a speedy deletion criterion or eliminate its seven-day waiting period.
Technical news
- Voting for proposals in the 2021 Community Wishlist Survey, which determines what software the Wikimedia Foundation's Community Tech team will work on next year, will take place from 8 December through 21 December. In particular, there are sections regarding administrators and anti-harassment.
Arbitration
- Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee Elections is open to eligible editors until Monday 23:59, 7 December 2020 UTC. Please review the candidates and, if you wish to do so, submit your choices on the voting page.
Sorry about the delay
I'm not giving the situation much priority with all that's going on elsewhere, Cirt now gone, and the huge effort I put into trying to work in good faith with Cirt. Sorry. A few thoughts:
I won't access the google drive docs. I've no interest in spending any time figuring out what the security risks may be by doing so. You're the first Wikipedian that's ever shared docs with me in that manner.
It all comes down to the references. Identifying the publisher, author, and quality of the specific reference should be a starting point. I've never seen obits quite like these, so am not sure what to do with them. In any other case, I'd be arguing much stronger against their use. --Hipal (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hipal, no worries. I've been quite busy lately, which is why I'm only responding now. Ok if you don't want to access the google drive docs (and still want to access them), you can reply to the email and I can attach them directly as PDFs. That being said, I'm planning to make a table for all of the references we currently have in the article over the weekend (or maybe Friday) to hopefully make it easier to evaluate the reliability of everything, so it might be unnecessary to access them since I will be posting most of the necessary information. We can discuss further on individual references after I make that. Sam-2727 (talk) 04:21, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
- I'm losing my patience with this. No offense. I feel like I'm repeating myself and being ignored.
- We should start with the publisher, author, and general classification of the article type. I don't know why I need to look at the entire article, unless some of those are difficult to ascertain. --Hipal (talk) 16:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
- Hipal, yes, that is why I will be compiling the table for the sources over the weekend. I just didn't know if you wanted to double check and/or look for information in the article not available in the front matter. Let's just wait until when I'm able to compile the list over the weekend (although I might be able to do it today) and go from there. Sam-2727 (talk) 17:06, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
New Page Patrol December Newsletter
Hello Sam-2727,
- Year in review
It has been a productive year for New Page Patrol as we've roughly cut the size of the New Page Patrol queue in half this year. We have been fortunate to have a lot of great work done by Rosguill who was the reviewer of the most pages and redirects this past year. Thanks and credit go to JTtheOG and Onel5969 who join Rosguill in repeating in the top 10 from last year. Thanks to John B123, Hughesdarren, and Mccapra who all got the NPR permission this year and joined the top 10. Also new to the top ten is DannyS712 bot III, programmed by DannyS712 which has helped to dramatically reduce the number of redirects that have needed human patrolling by patrolling certain types of redirects (e.g. for differences in accents) and by also patrolling editors who are on on the redirect whitelist.
| Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DannyS712 bot III (talk) | 67,552 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 2 | Rosguill (talk) | 63,821 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 3 | John B123 (talk) | 21,697 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 4 | Onel5969 (talk) | 19,879 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 5 | JTtheOG (talk) | 12,901 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 6 | Mcampany (talk) | 9,103 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 6,401 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 8 | Mccapra (talk) | 4,918 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 9 | Hughesdarren (talk) | 4,520 | Patrol Page Curation |
| 10 | Utopes (talk) | 3,958 | Patrol Page Curation |
- Reviewer of the Year
John B123 has been named reviewer of the year for 2020. John has held the permission for just over 6 months and in that time has helped cut into the queue by reviewing more than 18,000 articles. His talk page shows his efforts to communicate with users, upholding NPP's goal of nurturing new users and quality over quantity.
- NPP Technical Achievement Award
As a special recognition and thank you DannyS712 has been awarded the first NPP Technical Achievement Award. His work programming the bot has helped us patrol redirects tremendously - more than 60,000 redirects this past year. This has been a large contribution to New Page Patrol and definitely is worthy of recognition.
Six Month Queue Data: Today – 2262 Low – 2232 High – 10271
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here
18:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:DJ Will
Hello, Sam-2727. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DJ Will".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 00:42, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
- Liz, I don't know what the root problem is, but for some reason I got notified of this instead of the actual creator of the article (if I'm not mistaken, I reviewed the article at some point in time). Sam-2727 (talk) 03:21, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
Advert tag on Kin Insurance
Hello! You put an Advert tag on the Kin Insurance article and I'm both trying to understand what makes this tag applicable in general, and also how it applies to that page. I've tried to start a discussion on that subject's Talk page. Could you please come weigh in? Thanks. InsuranceLovers (talk) 15:59, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Aparna Rao
Hello! Your submission of Aparna Rao at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 13:51, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello! Your submission of Aparna Rao at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Flibirigit (talk) 05:24, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Empire AS Talk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2020 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Empire AS Talk! 18:17, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
- Empire AS, Thanks! Sam-2727 (talk) 19:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2020).
|
|
|
Guideline and policy news
- Speedy deletion criterion T3 (duplication and hardcoded instances) has been repealed following a request for comment.
Technical news
- You can now put pages on your watchlist for a limited period of time.
Arbitration
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes)
. The effectiveness of the discretionary sanctions can be evaluated on the request by any editor after March 1, 2021 (or sooner if for a good reason). - Following the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, BDD, Bradv, CaptainEek, L235, Maxim, Primefac.
- By motion, standard discretionary sanctions have been temporarily authorized
Wrong tagging
I have corrected your wrong tagging see diff Walrus Ji (talk) 08:32, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Wiki of Functions followup
Hi there, I'm a researcher for the Wikilambda project. Last month we held a naming contest and I'm following up with those who voted to see if you might be willing to provide some feedback to help guide the project.
This would be a 45 minute conversation about your past experience with other Wikimedia projects and thoughts about the future of this new initiative. I'm hoping to gather a wide range of perspectives so I'd be interested in your opinion regardless of whether you plan to have further involvement.
As a way of saying thanks, the research team is offering a $35 gift card (in your local currency) for participation. We could chat by phone or through a website for audio conferencing.
If you're interested just pick a time slot from this calendar link:
https://calendly.com/wikilambda/voter
Hope to hear from you soon!
// jeff (design researcher) (talk) 18:31, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
My article you recently accepted
You have recently accepted my article, List of Vega Launches, in to Wikipedia. Would you mind reviewing it to see if it is C-Class. Thank you so much in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.183.212.131 (talk) 12:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Incorrect capitals
In this edit, why did you leave those incorrect capitals in the title intact? (I fixed it.) Michael Hardy (talk) 02:13, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
- Michael Hardy, I must've not noticed. Thanks for moving the page. Sam-2727 (talk) 17:06, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Linda Manzanilla
Hello, Sam-2727. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Linda Manzanilla".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:40, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2021).
|
|
|
Arbitration
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
post-1992 politics of United States and closely related people
, replacing the 1932 cutoff.
- The standard discretionary sanctions authorized for American Politics were amended by motion to cover
Miscellaneous
- Voting in the 2021 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2021, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2021, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Wikipedia has now been around for 20 years, and recently saw its billionth edit!
DYK for Aparna Rao
On 10 January 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Aparna Rao, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the German anthropologist Aparna Rao studied the impact of the Kashmir conflict on both lives and the environment? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aparna Rao. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Aparna Rao), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.
— Amakuru (talk) 12:02, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Precious
astronomy
Thank you for quality articles about astronomy such as Zero Point (photometry) and galaxies such as NGC 755, and about scientists such as Vivien Zapf, for service in new page patrol and articles for creation, for collaboration encouraging newcomers as in Aparna Rao, - Sam, you are an awesome Wikipedian!
You are recipient no. 2509 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:35, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- Gerda Arendt, sorry for the very late response. But thanks for the award! Sam-2727 (talk) 03:55, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Request Edits
I noticed you recently started working on Wikipedia:Edit Request Wizard/COI and Wikipedia:Edit_Request_Wizard/Paid. I was wondering if you were familiar with Wikipedia:Request Edit Wizard, which was intended to make a process similar to AfC and file uploads. I don't think it works yet in terms of the back-end but may be a better starting place. CorporateM (Talk) 20:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- CorporateM, I did indeed see the request edit wizard, but only after creating WP:ERW. The organization of reviewing, making the process similar to AFC, seemed like a good idea, but the wizard seemed to have a broader focus outside that of a simple tool to help make edit requests. It also didn't help with paid editors. I think ideally, an edit request wizard would incorporate features of both (so maybe start as a separate draft). One of my many projects that I want to do is convert the edit request wizard to a javascript based form, much like the file upload wizard. This would allow people to submit edit requests without ever having to look or interact with wikitext. That is why I'm uninclined to revise an edit request wizard at the moment if it will all be for nothing when (or if) I'm able to implement it in javascript. What are your thoughts on that? Sam-2727 (talk) 04:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2021).
Administrator changes
Interface administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- A request for comment is open that proposes a process for the community to revoke administrative permissions. This follows a 2019 RfC in favor of creating one such a policy.
- A request for comment is in progress to remove F7 (invalid fair-use claim) subcriterion a, which covers immediate deletion of non-free media with invalid fair-use tags.
- A request for comment seeks to grant page movers the
delete-redirectuserright, which allows moving a page over a single-revision redirect, regardless of that redirect's target. The full proposal is at Wikipedia:Page mover/delete-redirect. - A request for comment asks if sysops may
place the General sanctions/Coronavirus disease 2019 editnotice template on pages in scope that do not have page-specific sanctions
? - There is a discussion in progress concerning automatic protection of each day's featured article with Pending Changes protection.
Technical news
- When blocking an IPv6 address with Twinkle, there is now a checkbox with the option to just block the /64 range. When doing so, you can still leave a block template on the initial, single IP address' talkpage.
- When protecting a page with Twinkle, you can now add a note if doing so was in response to a request at WP:RfPP, and even link to the specific revision.
- There have been a number of reported issues with Pending Changes. Most problems setting protection appear to have been resolved (phab:T273317) but other issues with autoaccepting edits persist (phab:T275322).
Arbitration
- By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions
authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, any gender-related dispute or controversy and associated people.
Sanctions issued under GamerGate are now considered Gender and sexuality sanctions. - The Kurds and Kurdistan case was closed, authorizing standard discretionary sanctions for
the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed
.
- By motion, the discretionary sanctions originally authorized under the GamerGate case are now authorized under a new Gender and sexuality case, with sanctions
Miscellaneous
- Following the 2021 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: AmandaNP, Operator873, Stanglavine, Teles, and Wiki13.
Karina Flores draft
Dear Sam-2727, I am looking for a reviewer specialist in classical music/opera to get the final approval for my draft, which was extensively reviewed and amended as requested by the previous reviewers; I will appreciate any help or suggestions. Kind regards LovingOperaForever (talk) 21:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Stephen Fuchs
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Stephen Fuchs you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 05:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Stephen Fuchs
The article Stephen Fuchs you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Stephen Fuchs for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 11:01, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Stephen Fuchs
The article Stephen Fuchs you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Stephen Fuchs for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Whiteguru -- Whiteguru (talk) 17:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)