User talk:InsuranceLovers

November 2020

Hello, I'm Kuru. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Reciprocal inter-insurance exchange have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Kuru (talk) 16:36, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ourbranch.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.ourbranch.com

[thanks for this note. I understand the mistake I made. Thanks for educating me on this. InsuranceLovers (talk) 14:37, 25 December 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Branch Insurance (December 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Branch Insurance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Branch Insurance, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:07, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, InsuranceLovers! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 17:07, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Branch Insurance has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Branch Insurance. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:18, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Branch Insurance has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Branch Insurance. Thanks! Eyebeller (talk) 16:30, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing?

Hello InsuranceLovers. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:InsuranceLovers. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=InsuranceLovers|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 16:43, 28 December 2020 (UTC

Hello Theroadislong. I do not have any financial relationship with any of the companies that are the subjects of the pages I've edited. Nor do I have any financial or professional relationship with any companies in the industry. InsuranceLovers (talk) 16:47, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you for making that clear. Theroadislong (talk) 16:53, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Branch Insurance has been accepted

Branch Insurance, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Eyebeller (talk) 18:24, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Are you directly or indirectly tied to any of the subjects you write about on Wikipedia? This is Branch Insurance ‎among other insurance companies you write about. ZXVZ (talk) 17:04, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. No, I'm not. I received the same question from another editor and answered it unambiguously on this same talk page. I don't know exactly how to provide evidence for this other than to point out that I've made improvements to some of Branch Insurance's direct competitors' (e.g., Kin, Hippo's) pages, and have a draft in progress for another one of its competitors, ClearCover. I don't want to provide too much detail on this public forum but I have a personal academic interest in insurance, and don't have any financial relationships with any insurance companies nor do I have any expectation to receive any payment.InsuranceLovers (talk) 20:14, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Branch Insurance for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Branch Insurance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Branch Insurance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

ZXVZ (talk) 17:57, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kin insurance logo.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kin insurance logo.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Branch Insurance Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Branch Insurance Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:25, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Clearcover

Hello, InsuranceLovers. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Clearcover, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:04, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Clearcover

Hello, InsuranceLovers. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Clearcover".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:00, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]