User talk:Sai Raghavendra Puranam/Archive 9

Archive 5

←

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

→

Archive 15

Good Article Nomination for Dookudu

With a completely written Plot, Production category and a few pictures and edits for Dookudu, I feel it can be nominated as a Good Article. If you feel that its feasible, Let me know your thoughts on this. We can work together to make it possible if its feasible. --Srikanthkoduru (talk) 17:47, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Good Job

Hi Raghu. I recently observed your edit to the poster of Seethamma Vakitlo Sirimalle Chettu. It looks great and vibrant. Since it is a well written article, please improve the story grammatically. Thank you.Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:30, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

I see misuse of Wiki trust

Hi Raghusri,

It is with regret to say that your removal of my edit in Baadshah review is strictly against the policies of wiki where freedom of sharing quality writing is lost . The review of Baadshah given by cinesiren is by noted film journalist who spend more than 10 years in media has started freelance writing . It is not a promotion , nor copied content . It is a review of a movie which has clearly shared the good and bad in the movie. The review is gramatically correct , copy scape verified and has decent content. I do not see a reason why in the first place you have to remove it .

I also don't understand how you allow websites like 123telugu.com Baadshah Movie review to be placed on wiki as they are the official marketers of the movie. They mention this in the website , they mention in the review , but still it gets accepted on wiki. What does reliable mean to you - a genuine review written by a journalist or a review of marketing partner of a movie .

There is trust placed on the guardians of wiki and I see that that is more used to protect some telugu movie websites monopoly on the wiki as well and not allowing others to share and grow. Please correct me if I am wrong.

If my content is not brought back - I will take it in the wiki senior moderator section with clear proofs of edits that are done in the last few and how there is injustice being done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Niranjan gat (talk • contribs) 07:37, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

non professional reviews at Shadow

Please revert yourself. It is your responsibility as the person adding or restoring content to provide reliable sourcing, hence your obligation to show that the websites are appropriately reliable, not mine to show that they are not. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 12:09, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

stop wasting my time

then why dont u split the two articles eega and naani???? why on earth u merge the articles and fight for image??? nonsense Murrallli (talk) 14:08, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Eega poster.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eega poster.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

baadshah

just trying to provide some more information. Baadshah is arabic version of persian word for king of kings. you can read more here:https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Padishah — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.244.138.234 (talk) 18:15, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

File Review

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 May 30-- Dravidian  Hero  13:08, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Good work

Hi Raghu. Thanks for increasing the clarity of the poster i re-uploaded for Sukumar's 2013 film "1".Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:23, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Your answer lies in krishna's talk page, which was answered by me before i was revising some notes. Check it.Pavanjandhyala (talk) 12:35, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you!!

Thanks for the nice gesture Raghu. I have been busy for last couple of months, good to see that you are still actively contributing. Have a nice time. krZna (talk) 18:15, 31 May 2013 (UTC)