User talk:Sai Raghavendra Puranam/Archive 10
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | → | Archive 15 |
Reply to edit removal (User talk:212.142.95.66)
>> Hello, I'm Raghusri. An edit that you recently made to Firefox release history seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Raghusri 12:13, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Raghusri. The small edit I made on the page you refer to wasn't accidental or just a test. It was meant to swap 2 neighbouring table entries to be in strictly chronological order as it should be from the very beginning. If you would care to analyze the surrounding entries you'd get what I mean. Please, revert my edit back if coherent information layout means anything to you.
P.S. I don't have an account on Wikipedia as I don't plan on creating new articles yet and my edits are quite seldom, too. But this shouldn't automatically make them seem random or irrational. -- cheers, BH 212.142.95.66 (talk) 12:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Dookudu
Okk !! Now that I understand u don`t hav any idea of Policies and Guidelines on Manual of Style. I`ll try to break it down for U, my edits are pretty much as per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking and Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Text formatting. So, please go through the links and see how Wikipedia articles are written and formatted. This "Manual of Style" helps to maintain consistent and standard format for the Wikipedia articles. regards, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 18:42, 5 June 2013 (UTC).
Eega poster
Hi Raghu. I just came across the poster you uploaded for Eega. It was good, but the title is not clear. If you dont have any issues with my advice, please give a look at the below link.
It was uploaded by me on Telugu Wikipedia in which i and Krzna are fellow users. This poster was given to me by my friend who edited using Adobe Photoshop. if you like it, use it. If not, leave it. But please don't reply about anything other than your opinion of using it or not, Thank you. P.J. (talk) 12:59, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
1 - film poster
Raghu, could you please provide me the source or evidence that the poster you have uploaded was released officially by the production team. Looks to me as a bad Photoshop poster. If you are not sure about the source as well, then i suggest reverting back to the original. Thanks, krZna (talk) 15:35, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Raghu, you cannot modify non-free media such as the film posters, it's a big no to edit licensed images on Wiki. Please revert the image back to the one you uploaded earlier (the actual movie poster). If you can't then let me know, i will try to do it. krZna (talk) 23:33, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
apherald
Given that the article about this publication/website was deleted as being non-notable, it seems like that would be the default about its use as a reference. Some of the concerns raised during the deletion discussion are the same ones that would raise concerns about reliability in general. Nobody had contested the authorship aspect at the admin discussion and I don't have an opinion on that. But the now-blocked editor (and others) were rapidly adding many refs to it to many articles, including adding redundant refs for existing cited info, so it has the appearance of WP:REFSPAM (again as noted by other admins). I don't know in general if it is worth listing when gathering multiple reviews of films (given these concerns, etc.). Maybe WP:RSN would be a good place to discuss it. DMacks (talk) 08:13, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Hiii
K ranganatha sai, is only one film old, what u will create encyclopedia???, also ur statement are you here to vandalize is not a right way to welcome editors, Murrallli (talk) 05:33, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
GS-2 Resembles Yevadu
Hii. Once go through the newly created article Gabbar Singh 2. You will find the shades and citations of Yevadu in it. Reply soon.Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:14, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Very simple. Once go through it, the cast, the production company, the references everything including the production has been copy-pasted from Yevadu article. If you see it, you can find the following things.
- Pawan Kalyan peened the story for GS 2. But here Vakkantham Vamsi, the writer of Yevadu is credited.
- Allu Arjun and Kajal Aggarwal are making cameos in Yevadu, not in GS 2. If it was true, it would have been the Talk of the Tinsel town that Kajal who was replaced, plays a cameo and Allu Arjun is appearing in PK's film.
- Pawan Kalyan Creative works is the banner and Sarath Marar is the producer. But here Sri Venkateswara Creations is the banner and Dil Raju is the producer, which was the info of Yevadu.
- While the team is busy in selecting a heroine, Shruti Haasan is being credited, who is the heroine of Yevadu actually. If this happens, she would have told the same in the twitter.
- Biggest Blunder : Sampath Nandi is the director while Vamsi Paidipally, the director of Yevadu, is credited
- Much fooling : Dil Raju is being replaced by Pawan Kalyan as the Male lead
- OMG : The film's shoot is expected to take off in August 2013 after completion of Attharintiki daaraedhi. But here April 27, 2012 is shown as the date of commencement of filming.
Now, isnt this such a foolish thing. 30 edits including a page moving were done without noticing this. Isnt this something undesirable. Think once.Pavanjandhyala (talk) 11:32, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
About Change on your article Gabbar Singh (film) !
Hi dude, I made a change in that article about the movie is dubbed in hindi as - Policewala Gunda ! sorry coz i didn't gave any source there.. actually m a newbie on wiki ! well here is the source which says movie is dubbed in hindi ! Click here to watch Hindi Trailer Uploaded By Goldminestelefilms
also you can watch the first premier of movie on sat max on 22nd June 2013 at 9 pm
Thanks for your Msg ! i would like to learn more from you.. --Mobtownin (talk) 16:40, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
Your recent editing history at Dookudu shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 15:46, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
115.249.232.210 sorry anna naku editing ante chala istam adi wiki lo anduke ela chesa i am extremely sorry
115.249.232.210 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.249.232.210 (talk) 15:39, 29 June 2013 (UTC)