Jump to content

User talk:Sahgalji

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Sahgalji, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Sahgalji, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! S0091 (talk) 18:18, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on User:Sahgalji requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. S0091 (talk) 18:18, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uzma Beg (December 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:36, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Sahgalji! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 14:36, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Uzma Beg (December 31)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 16:02, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Uzma Beg has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Uzma Beg. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 16:33, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Uzma Beg has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Uzma Beg. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


I have added several additional references. Please consider the following:

1. This article is not paid content at all. I am not paid to write it. I'm the subject's friend - and was being totally honest by declaring an interest. Declaring an interest does not equate to being paid for the article. Please may I request for that assertion to be removed from the article

2. The feedback provided on the article makes a broad statement that YouTube is not a reliable source. I have therefore added several other sources. However YouTube is a broad repository of video content and there are reputable organizations that upload their content to Youtube. In the case of this subject - Uzma Beg - she has acted in a host of TV shows that have aired on Pakistani TV across different channels including HumTV, A+ and PTV home. Each of these are mainstream channels in the country and each has viewership in the tens of millions. These TV channels upload content (that has already aired on TV) to YouTube where they further monetize the content. If you take a few minutes to click on the links you will see that several of them have millions of views and are associated with official channels. However I have taken your feedback and added several additional references in addition to YouTube. Please note that none of the YouTube videos I have referenced are owned or uploaded by the subject.

I would like to ask that the review not be done at a cursory level - where the mere mention of YouTube causes the draft to be rejected. Instead I am asking that you take a closer look. Thanks in advance for your time and effort.

AfC notification: Draft:Uzma Beg has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Uzma Beg. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:01, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Uzma Beg for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uzma Beg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uzma Beg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Saqib (talk I contribs) 18:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]