User talk:Sahalekhak

This is Sahalekhak's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Dinesh S. Katre has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dinesh S. Katre. Thanks! TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:27, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

TheBirdsShedTears Thanks for your guidance! I have removed "trustworthy" and trivial citations. --Sahalekhak (talk) 08:19, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your guidance! I have removed "trustworthy" and trivial citations. Sahalekhak (talk) 15:41, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

removed the promotional tone

AfC notification: Draft:Dinesh S. Katre has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Dinesh S. Katre. Thanks! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 03:48, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

removal of excessive citations

Dear Nomadicghumakkad, Thanks for your advise! I have kept only specific citations in the article https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Dinesh_S._Katre Sahalekhak (talk) 06:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dinesh S. Katre (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

sources are mostly on the centre that he leads. the text here is written in promotional tone, and not congruent with the sources. i.e. sources go something like 'the centre did something', and the text here 'the subject was instrumental in...' eh?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dinesh S. Katre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dinesh S. Katre, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 11:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sahalekhak! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – robertsky (talk) 11:30, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dinesh S. Katre (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sahaib3005 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dinesh S. Katre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dinesh S. Katre, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sahaib3005 (talk) 11:11, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dinesh S. Katre

Hello, Sahalekhak. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dinesh S. Katre, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]