User talk:Saffario

This is Saffario's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Earth Beat Festival (April 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Earth Beat Festival and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Earth Beat Festival, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 18:13, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saffario! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 18:13, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Earth Beat Festival (May 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Earth Beat Festival and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Earth Beat Festival, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 10:46, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing?

Hello Saffario. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Saffario. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Saffario|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 08:08, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Threadsong, thanks for this. I can confirm that I am not being paid or compensated directly or indirectly from the organisation. Earth Beat Aotearoa relies on a large number of volunteers for its operation. I am one volunteer who has taken up the task of entering the Wiki page for this event out of my own volition. I strongly beleive the festival is of national and international importance given the caliber of talent it is associated with and the large number of people that come in contact with it. My intention is simply to create an objective page where readers can learn more about the festival, its origins and its affiliation. Where I am failing at this, I appreciate your help in support in improving the page so that it can be published. I worked industriously over the last 6 months to improve upon the article based on the feedback provided by the last reviewer Pythoncoder. I am therefore surprised that it is still failing to meet the required criteria. Please advise accordingly.

Kind regards Saffario (talk) 01:29, 18 May 2021 (UTC) Saffario (talk) 21:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Saffario: Do you receive anything at all from Earth Beat? Free tickets or a festival pass? If so we classify that as compensation and you need to declare your paid editing status. Editors with a strong connection to the subject are rarely the ideal editors for a subject; those with no connection are usually the best. Please see the paid editing directions above. --- Possibly (talk) 21:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Possibly: Thanks for clarifying. I've been living in the UK for the last 5 years. I was at the first Earth Beat Festival in 2015 and then relocated overseas, so I haven't been fortunate enough to receive free passes, compensation etc. I had a life-changing experience at the festival and have been writing about this in various publications in the UK. It felt natural to open a Wiki page for it given how beneficial Wikipedia has been in my own journey and how much time I spend on the platform. Saffario (talk) 09:24, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]